Ha, ha, ha
I have no ill-will towards Musk Enterprises, although I do know that the people claiming it runs without massive state subsidies are fools.
Just as Scaled Composites should have been disqualified from the X prize because of massive cross-subsidies from the US military, Space X runs off massive state subsidies. Private venture it may once have been, if it ever was, it sure isn't now.
I like our supply ship, it seems efficient.
Still, the only thing getting people up to and down from orbit is the good old Soyuz, with many technical (the brilliant auto-docking system, among others) and nagivational (fast path to orbit) innovations.
They are not ineffective and are valuable things. US arseholes in Congress complain, but they will be paying (and already are for Space X) more per launch than for Soyuz. When the US military-industrial complex gets their incredably subsidized thing into orbit, it will cost even more.
I wonder what happened to the space-tourism offer of a slingshot on Soyuz around the Moon. Plenty of arseholes for whom it would have been small change.
Maybe the radiation problem is too great and the Moon landings were fake, I only say that to be irritating, but radiation outside the van Allen belt is harsh, the Moon-bound astronauts had no special protection.
Nobody has taken up the circumlunar Soyuz offer, and I think it is no longer on offer.m