Shall we stick to the issues?
"As apologist blather that's on par with saying "so what if Hitler invaded Poland"! Only a completely blinkered, self-deceiving fool would even try and argue...."
"Go buy a clue, you seem incapable of attaiing one by other means."
Man, what part of @Ledswinger's comment "...because the process of debate is not helped by weak and unjustified ad hominems, and because unlike you I'm not jumping to any conclusions about who you are, where you're from, and what you believe - other than that which you put your name to."... don't you get?
If you feel that you can't debate something important without behaving like a sullen teenager then why bother. Its called playing the ball and not the man. Look up the term "ad hominem". If your points are good and solid then they'll speak for themselves. If not then they're open to debate, just like everyone else's.
And if you think that reading the Guardian and the New York Times makes you informed then I suggest that you might want to broaden your reading horizons. Things are generally not what they seem, whether its Iran, the US, the UK or Israel.
Biting the hand that feeds IT
