
Oh goody.
MORE crap floating around in space...just what we need...NOT!
744 publicly visible posts • joined 11 Jan 2012
"They alienated existing users. Especially those with playbooks. (I'm glad I resisted the temptation)"
I did not resist the temptation...and am one of many who were extremely hacked off when Old Thorsten baby pulled the plug on BB10 for the PB...after "assuring" owners that RIM would indeed make it available.
http://tabtimes.com/news/ittech-os-playbookblackberry/2013/01/30/blackberry-confirms-bb10-will-come-playbook-weighs-next
After that, I wouldn't own ANY BB devices, even if they did turn the company around...which will never happen.
"You have an awesome lot to learn about what can be done today, by a few, [who may at any time or place in space choose to be more than just a few whenever they share what they be doing] for a different tomorrow,..."
So how did that "Arab Spring" thing turn out? That ended up OK...didn't it? Everyone got what they were after.
OK...maybe not.
"Although it does make one wonder what the hell is going on when features that are so CORE to the product are the ones that go wrong."
Nothing new here. Apple has been using its customers as Beta Testers for years. Why should anything change now with Boy Wonder 6 feet under?
Have to agree with you.
Corporate Boards are supposed to oversee what their "employees" (CEOs, COOs, CFOs, CIOs, etc.) do in the performance of their jobs.
It is up the the Board to make sure that these folks don't screw things up, and if they do, then the Board should either call them in on the carpet, or get rid of them.
BUT...and it is a BIG BUT...due to the incestuous nature of corporate boards around the planet...there is very little...if any...true oversight.
And if someone IS given their walking papers for a major screw-up...they fairly rapidly re-appear on some other corporate board...to start the process all over again.
"Surely nobody – not even the most avid fanboi – now believes that Jobs left "four years of new products" in the pipeline, as his biographer Walter Isaacson reported in 2011. Assuming Isaacson was inspecting Apple's lab in 2010, the first "three years" will soon be up. Which raises the question: is anything left?"
What about the iWatch? iTV anyone? Surely to be announced VERY soon...won't they? We're all on the collective edge of our seats waiting. I know Steve wants it that way. Why else would he have left 4 years worth of new products for his successors? He did do that...didn't he?
And as for "...most people look no further than some model of iPhone or some model of Galaxy S when choosing a phone." It's been Motorola and/or LG since 1994 for me. Never...ever...considered Apple or Samsung.
Only one slight problem with Apple's description of this.
"The authentication system features a redesigned home button and a metal sensor ring around it. Apple's promotional blurb explains: "[The sensor] uses advanced capacitive touch to take, in essence, a high-resolution image of your fingerprint from the sub-epidermal layers of your skin."
Your fingerprints are a part of the epidermal layer of your skin. Try consulting a medical dictionary next time Apple.
My...my...my...looks like there are 24 folks (& counting) who can't face up to the realities of life. Poor bastards.
And I never said I was in favor of spying...but it has been going on ever since the monkeys started walking upright...and isn't EVER going to stop.
So for you 24 downvoters. Have a Farcebook account? How about Twatter? Use G-mail at all? Signed up with LinkedIn by any chance? Do you have ANY cell phone? Do you use a computer? (obvious answer on the last one).
If you answered yes to ANY of the above questions...well guess what? Someone...somewhere...is most likely tracking what you are doing. And when you don't KNOW they are tracking you...that's called SPYING children. ROTFLMAO.
So instead of the data residing on someone else's storage device, it resides on this thing, which sits in YOUR possession, and you can then access it, or share it, via the Internet.
Isn't that "cloud storage" anyway?
Just that the owner of it controls the "cloud" instead of Amazon, or whomever...and who is someone probably not well versed in security. Sounds like shaky security to me. And P-2-P at that? Oh goody.
You should also consider one of those "Flying Squirrel" Suits for Lord Babbage (I'm sure HRH will be contacting him soon for his feat) for his next venture into the Stratosphere.
With that...and some well placed/designed servos...he could avoid the arboreal hazards, and land comfortably on his paws on Terra Firma.
"And top Wikileaker Julian Assange sees the case having the opposite effect to what the government is hoping for:
Mr Manning’s treatment has been intended to send a signal to people of conscience in the US government who might seek to bring wrongdoing to light...."
Agree 1000%. Have absolutely no use for any of this "social networking" tripe.
If people are so devoid of their own self-worth that they need "followers"...or "likes" (how old are you anyway FFS that you need someone to "like" you...9?) to bolster their pathetic, fragile egos...then civilization is rapidly headed straight down the Loo.
"The numbers come from Appysnap, a social photography app whose makers asked Brits aged 18 to 35 how embarrassing the pictures stored on their handsets really were."
No...these dullards are "Gen Y"...not "Gen X". You one of them perhaps?
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Generation_Y
"The Left wing bias is also prevalent and entrenched in the media (except of course the Daily Mail) including the impartial BBC."
Ahhh...did we forget about the Rupert Murdoch media empire mayhaps? Hmmm? Slightly to the right of Atilla the Hun, I do believe.
So yes...your "theory" is shot to shiite.