> "Astra refuses to engage in collusion and never lies," Andon Labs said.
I find it hard to believe anything connected with Altman did not lie. Especially when LLMs are known to invent facts, also known as lying.
2598 publicly visible posts • joined 9 Jan 2012
" Arm claims this makes desktop-class graphics possible within a 1 W power budget.
"The G2-Ultra NX GPU is able to sustain a 30 frame per second gaming session on content with very rich and intricate ray traced scenery. "
30 FPS? HAHAHAHA. My desktop is pissing itself laughing.
Even my Steam Deck thinks that is slow.
Is this the developer equivalent of rearranging the deck chairs on the Titanic?
Certainly it would be low on my list of priorities if I were working on or using something with the security track record of Warelay / Clawd / Clawdis / Clawdbot / Moltbot / OpenClaw or whatever stupid name they are using this month.
> The file name includes the target's name, which the researchers said could suggest that each target is singled out specifically, and a degree of reconnaissance has to be carried out prior to the attack.
The attackers have to impersonate the victim's bank so I guarantee there is reconnaissance required.
Security researchers just have no common sense.
> Enterprise tier with all the bells and whistles like SLAs and extra security and access controls
Given Altman makes Pinocchio look like a saint and LLM companies can't spell security I would suggest what you actually get at the Enterprise tier are lies, damn lies and yet more lies.
(Altman already replaced the statistics.)
SO mostly what I'm getting form this story is that OpenAI's engineers are incompetent.
Providing a spreadsheet with Google Drive links but no internet access, forgetting to upload the target file for analysis, filing to isolate agents from each other, failing to isolate the test lab from the Internet, the fuck ups just keep rolling in.
> OpenAI assumes its model is capable of forming intent and possesses an internal sense of truth – which would not be surprising in light of CEO Sam Altman's musings about superintelligence.
Truth? Altman has never heard of it. Every word out of his mouth is a lie that he hopes is what the listener wants to hear.
But not half as impressive as the feat required to actually get a Starship to the moon. A dozen launches, unprecedented fuel storage, unproven propellant transfer, a rocket that has never made it to orbit yet... the list of firsts required is staggering and the number of failure points for Artemis IV frightening.
It is not 11 work days though. The bot will work 24/7 but after meetings, lunch, breaks, etc a human might get 6 hours of productive work done in a day at best so it is actually 44 work days.
It is also not a single bot either but a team of unspecified size - "using a fleet of Claude agents running in parallel".
But a team of bots taking 44 work days doesn't sound so good on Twitter I guess.
So 69.14% is "a few percent" and Google are struggling against Apple's world leading 30.79%?
I think you need a few lessons in mathematics, search engine use and El Reg's policy of not brown nosing Apple like the rest of the industry. Or has that gone by the wayside along with spelling and English grammar?
USA, Russia, China, Japan, India, Israel, South Korea and ESA could all do this.
Iran and North Korea have also demonstrated the ability to launch satellites into orbit (sometimes) but may lack the scientific knowledge to build the detector.