Secure?
Cheap combination locks are generally a doddle to crack, by either physical or logical brute force. Besides, the determined data thief could just open the drive and bypass the connector altogether.
952 publicly visible posts • joined 19 Jun 2007
No, but it is a horses for courses, one man's meat, etc thing.
The 4/3rds format took off as much as it did (which isn't hugely, admittedly) precisely because there are people who want a smaller camera for whatever reason. The Olympus E410 and its siblings carry this aspect off very well, yet they are still bulky enough beasts to allow room for further improvement.
I guess there are many reasons to like or dislike a format of camera, but to me the ultimate appeal of a DSLR is the big sensor. In the end it doesn't matter how clever a camera is if the picture quality is crap. If this is a way to get a DSLR-class sensor into more manageable cameras, then I'm all for it. It's not as if true DSLRs are going to suffer for it.
But, but but... it's black, it's got a lumpy bit on top and a decent hand grip. It must be an SLR...
Sadly James is not alone at the Register in this level of ignorance.
Of course, it's probably an SLR as far as ill-informed law enforcement agencies are concerned, so he might have a point there.
On a similar theme, they've never been bothered to do anything about the wrong certificates being associated with domains. Last November I raised the issue of the problem in this regard when navigating via http://www.google.co.uk/adsense for example, and they replied "I am happy to pass along your comments to our engineering and product teams", who went ahead and did bugger all as usual. Still broken needless to say.
That's fine if you don't mind an effective sensor size about the same as that of a grain of salt. Bear in mind this sensor will be quite small enough already, without further cropping. What you are essentially talking about is digital zoom, which even PC World have stopped bragging about now.
Mind you, the optical zoom race is equally as mad as the megapixel race, with e.g. the new Fuji F100fs having a 14x zoom but the lens suffering some of the worst ever chromatic aberration of any camera, as a result of the compromises needed to get that in conjunction with a larger than average sensor whilst keeping the camera handleable.
Sensible megapixels (I recall someone did a study that determined that for compact camera size sensors, 6Mp was optimum with current technologies) and sensible zoom. IMHO, obviously!
Apparently [cnet, digitimes] this is being developed for LG by MSI.
What's the betting it turns out to be yet another customised MSI Wind?
Looks like MSI are keen for just about anyone but themselves to sell it (Advent, Medion, now LG?), not really being an end-user manufacturer historically.
It was all a bit tired. I've been up on Freetards' Hill for the last three events, and it's definitely declined even in that time. I don't think there's been anything much actually new since the first time I went, and even the old favourites like the Harrier, MiG and Tornado have been dropped from the programme. I guess we can make an exception for the Vulcan but that's a special case, and even that wasn't a patch on when I saw it at Abingdon in the 80s. I simply don't get their Spitfire infatuation. The Blades were fun this year though, and the Red Arrows justified our viewing position without question. None of the paytards can say they had them passing 30-40 feet over their head, or saw the whites of the pilots' eyes.
And very nice too, but why oh why don't they make these with at least the option of an LCD/VFD display? As it is, about the only viable cube format cases are the Morex 668 and 669 - which don't have such a display but at least have enough space (and no fancy but hindering stealth covers) to slot one in (decent displays, e.g. iMon, all seem to be 5.25" format) and still sport an optical drive.
Not all platters are the same, even from the same manufacturer. Different products have fundamentally different data densities, so the same size platter fundamentally holds different amounts, and the read/write hardware will be specifically made to match.
It is conceivable a drive could support the data storage equivalent of overclocking. I've seen it done on floppy disks, but reliability goes through the floor, and you might be OK with risking a couple of megs but not several hundred gigs. It's not very likely to be possible on a hard disk though - unlike floppy disks, the controller is built into the unit itself, so not likely to be "hackable".
Can someone please explain why hard-disk equipped consoles are factory-fitted with such paltry units? 20GB, 60GB ... like wow, didn't I have that on my desktop five years ago? The drives are hardly mainstream any more, so surely cost above the odds unless they're using dusty stockpiles no-one else wants to touch with a bargepole.
For the average viewer (rather than the average Register commenter, who considers any screen < 40" to be not worth watching), no the change isn't particularly meaningful. This is getting as silly as the whole PC "arms race" thing, where the envelope was unnecessarily pushed for years, with the consumer losing out when finding perfect good kit to be obsolete/unsupported. Shops sell LCD HDTVs exclusively (well you might find one Nikki-nakki CRT if you're lucky) because they have better profit margin and lower warehousing requirements. Now public have HDTVs they are told they are wasting their potential if they don't receive in HD.
... engage with the way young people want to vote. There have been incredibly successful trials of telephone and internet voting in local government, but these have been repeatedly rejected by national government for fear it will devalue the vote, i.e. that if people can vote by a convenient means, they won't take it as seriously.
So in other words, encourage the young to vote, but not in such great droves that there's actually a chance of changing the establishment status quo.
23p per print that's a quarter the size of anyone else's and doesn't even match the aspect ratio of most consumer cameras so will either waste that minuscule space or be distorted to hell?
No ta. I suspect if I was given one I would test if it lived up to its silly name, by throwing it out of the window and seeing if it bounced.
We've switched to Avast!, which is proving much slicker in every way. Even without the real-time scanning, AVG8 was bloaty and turned even a fast PC to treacle for several minutes after start-up.
Re the scanning, they could settle for an intermediate solution of checking URLs against their own list of dodgy ones (wasting only their own bandwidth) updated automatically based on the on-demand checking initiated by actual visitors to the sites in question. Of course, that would upset those who might be uneasy about Grisoft potentially collecting searching-habit data, but it's probably not as bad as actual connections being unknowingly opened to sites of dubious repute.
Might work for current issues, if it can be done in a more timely manner than the local radio traffic updates which always seem to be way behind. I remember one recent trip, where they were warning of a big accident, road partially blocked, emergency vehicles in attendance etc, over the course of a couple of hours. We went through the alleged location twice during the period they were reporting updates, and didn't see a thing. Either huge information delays rendering the service useless, or some canny motorist realised that if he rang in with a phony report, it would significantly lighten the traffic on the road and help him get to his destination quicker...
Yes, all different names for the same thing, but doesn't change that this new D700 is one of a very select and noteworthy handful. My original comment wasn't directed at you; I was surprised this wasn't mentioned outright in the article rather than only by allusion to the D3.
HD over Freeview will require new decoding hardware, so better wait a bit longer, right? On the other hand, people who heeded the message and upgraded to digital ahead of schedule are going to get mightily pissed off.
A large part of the problem is how muddied the waters have become. Every time there's a marketing push towards digital take-up, it seems to be cunningly accompanied by some new potentially-divisive initiative that persuades anyone with any sense to hold off a bit longer, and a bit longer, etc etc. The timing of Freeview Playback, Freesat, the whole HD nonsense, iPlayer etc all are perfectly understandable reasons why the technologically cautious are playing the waiting game.
Real flash (take note lazy journos) and sensible megapixellage for the unspecified but inevitably tiny sensor size. I wondered what (if any) zoom facility there was other than pointless digital zoom, and found this on the Motorola website:
"Fixed optical zoom lens"
I'll take that as a yeah-but-no-but...
Animating the lights would probably fall foul of whatever legislation it is that decrees against flashing lights on car stereos etc while the vehicle is in motion. I suspect satnavs in general only get away with it because of the questionable value of finding good deep rivers to ditch into.