Re: Wot, no GOTO?
Brilliant, thank you :)
197 posts • joined 13 Dec 2011
If law was truly based on reducing social harm then online gambling ought to be just as illegal as drugs, but it's not, and gambling firms make huge amounts of money from promoting addiction.
The war on drugs is a moral crusade - I am not a homosexual therefore all homosexuals are depraved deviants - similarly, drinkers, non-churchgoers, golfers, queen fans, and anyone else indulging in my list of petty hates.
I don't see how taking drugs, consenting adults acting in private, should be a criminal matter - surely criminality has to include intentional or reckless harm to others?
Sure, there would be public health penalties if drugs were legalised, as there are with horse riding, motorbikes, mountain climbing, alcohol, food, and worse of all, gambling.
I don't have an easy answer, legalised consumption but illegal supply chain, as in Portugal, is fundamentally conflicted - and does not take the money out of the criminal empires that kill thousands every year.
I don't see that the current approach will ever succeed, like prohibition you cannot stop people "getting off" on stuff, it is a universal human trait - across all cultures - right down to little children spinning round till they get dizzy and fall over.
Which particular views did you find sickening?
Sure, a lot of commentards are agreeing that a harsh justice was served - which is never a good thing generally. Beware of those who seek harsh punishment was a Greek Philosopher's maxim, or Roman, wasn't it?
However, this could have been the beginning of a "London Bridge" type killing spree, indistinguishable. Such cases of legitimate fatal self-defence are rare, and are, like it or not, a fair argument in support of gun carrying - a well-trained, vetted, un-angry citizen protecting his family against immediate lethal threat. It ought to be possible to make gun law in the US so that it is more of this type, with training, licensing, vetting...
So, give the pro-gun lobby their day in the sun, you have to understand their reasonable argument in this case.
I agree with your conclusion that overall, guns are a bad thing, a very bad thing, with vastly more costs than benefits, but I refuse to be sickened by "evidence for" - evidence that runs counter to my conclusion.
Fascinating link, thanks for that
My favourite of all time is this one:
On the main article - " a printing process Intel would dearly love to copy" - made me laugh out loud, a bit like going up to Faf de Clerk, the long-haired South African rugby player, built like a brick shithouse - and telling him he looks a bit like a girl.
There are a number of potential fixes that don't involve a garage visit, it is just an engineering problem.
Firstly, reduce the amount of information you "need" to store to an absolute minumum, this always helps.
If the unit has permanent power, you could keep this in RAM, and only commit to flash if the battery is disconnected, relying on your bulk capacitors. However there are a number of tricky issues involved, many of which could be overcome, but it's all a lot of work. Things like the latency between detecting loss of power - perhaps the unit might be asleep? - and getting on with the write. You may only be able to write a few blocks, depending on the write time and your capacitance.
Best then to have an acceptable "no data saved" backup configuration.
My preferred solution, assuming there is no other easy fix, is to make the nVidia chip so it never writes its flash again - and offload the NVM storage either to another unit on the CAN bus, existing or new, or even, ghastly but cheap, make a device that plugs into the OBD port, and store stuff on there.
Well that's your problem right there... salting down the graves just seems to bring 'em back to life.
Sodding Cortana has arrived from nowhere - you, probably - and now offers "helpful" advice on a daily basis as an email into Outlook.
Useful things like suggesting I might be able to get some work done, sorry, - I might have a "focus opportunity", between the meetings scheduled at 1-2pm and 4pm.
Turns out you can't block sender email@example.com, as that would clearly be a typing error, and Outlook fixes it for you.
Why can't they leave stuff the fuck alone? - or at least provide an opt-in-to-whatever-random-bollocks-your-shit-eating-marketroids-pull-out-of-their-arses-next.
I try hard not to dislike overblown unfunny "comedians", glad to see you're struggling with similar - we don't want to be seen as a people held together by what we hate, even if it is the truth.
I had been wondering what to do about the chinese suppliers I bought some LED's and modules off - and who now send me special offers, invariably including "10-speed voice-activated masturbation cup", and similar variants, deviants possibly.
Would make a perfect secret Santa present for "oh God, is that..." - and maybe his only opportunity ever, to actually make me laugh.
Basically, Office 365 appears to report every change, every click, every button press on every document.
This was "explained" as a wizzy new featured that allowed it to continue working even whilst being updated - a use case of about 0.0001%.
I can't see how checking for an updated button code "object", halfway through an update, is ever going to work, or even be testable.
In return, you get an exact timeline on every document, that you can't access, but MS can - and can release some/all to management tracking tools.
I think it's a huge security risk - in that it massively increases the value of stolen data.
Imagine a commercial espionage situation; the disk-image data for most companies would run to terabytes, a lot to look through - but the statistics on which documents are in use, being edited or viewed, by whom, is an enormous clue as to what is the important data.
So, as usual, poor privacy has a sting in its tail, with unforeseen security risks waiting to be exploited.
I wonder if a “Vegan Breakfast” would count?
- a cup of coffee and a cigarette…
I did once complain to a Australian colleague – late into a long day meeting abroad – that that was all I’d had so far that day.
…That’s nothing – all I’ve had is a Dingo’s breakfast…
A Dingo’s breakfast?
…Yeah, a scratch, a sniff and a look around…
I seem to be in agreement with you again.
Penrose is a true genius and richly deserving of a Nobel Prize - the only problem would be which of his many contributions to reward.
The scary aspect you mention is perfectly demonstrated if you look at either of the interviews linked-to.
It's like being a wondrous child again, hearing grown-ups discuss stuff way beyond your reach - yet you make some sense of it.
I know what you mean - he sees your method and conclusion from the moment you set the problem - but in a kind way.
I love it, they're casually describing Riemann space, surfaces, Weyl curvature, negative dimensionality, Penrose's Spinors and Twistor theory, meetings with Dirac - and a few sideways jibes at the popular stuff. - It's neither dark, nor energy, guys ... They simply don't give a shit if you're not keeping up - no soothing music, sunsets, permagrinned oxytocin junkies - they just keep on talking - and it's brilliant.
The interviews are simply lovely, he is such a modest character. Oscar Wilde might quip that he has much to be modest about? - and quite right, he does, about a Nobel Prizes worth.
No word of a lie, just a year ago, mates boss sent out a late email saying that he'd had to stop working on the spreadsheet, because the batteries in his calculator had given out.
Seriously! - he was adding-up the figures and typing them in over the formula.
Erm , please correct me if i'm wrong, but the back-story to the conspiracy goes like this:
Records of vaccine are hard to access and maintain, particularly in poor countries.
the "BCG" is an easy one, because it leaves a scar, and doctors, A&E can tell immediately.
There was a thought to tattoo the vaccinated, but that is too much like branding cattle.
There was a thought to use a glass transponder - much like with pets and farm animals, they can be read/write and be updated with all vaccinations, allergies, blood group - the stuff you might need in an emergency. It didn't get far, there are nefarious uses, it's a big privacy (whatever that is these days?) problem,
The only real proposal that Bill Gates looked at was a sub-dermal laser barcode, of some sort, invisible, not like branding, and carries only a byte or two of info.
I don't see a problem with that - but sure, if it were a unique barcode per person, that has abuse potential.
This is the "Bill Gates wants to barcode all of humanity for his own evil purposes" conspiracy.
The implantable glass transponder is inevitably viewed as a mind-control device, thanks X-files, darkening the conspiracy further.
Crazy thing is that all the anti-vaxxers are on Facebook, which is an actual mind-control device and is bent on all manner of evil purposes - it does whatever money wants it to do.
I've rowed back somewhat (see above) - I take your points also.
I guess it can't be easily codified - which was my point about Bill and Melinda - any hard rules that would catch "monumental shit" above, would catch B+M also.
It's beyond my simple commentard analysis, there are loosely-defined quantities like decorum and professionalism (as mentioned in the piece) at the heart of it..
The truth is, authority and seniority do require you to act appropriately, you are in a position of trust, and the remuneration reflects this.
Here in the UK you can be debarred as a solicitor, or struck-off as a doctor, for a single "driving over the alcohol limit" offence, in your private time.
Probity, they call it, and it covers pretty much anything that might bring the profession into disrepute, even a series of "honest" adulterous affairs - god forbid if they were employees also.
So, two cheers for Google, well done - even if a bit late.
It's all in stark contrast to the recent Facebook whistleblower case, where the rare charge of "bringing the company into repute" was brought...
Right... many thanks for the update. It's a tricky one isn't it!
The guy is obviously a monumental shit - and it is a similar case since it relies on elements of "hierarchical coercion" and certainly an unpleasant predatory aspect.
I accept that consent is not an absolute defence, nor complaint a requirement - in fact I utterly disagree with my previous post, which is a bit embarrassing - but hey, that's what incisive journalism can do to you.
I agree, it is not at all the same thing.
The JB case looks like "love affair" - with no hint of coercion or direct (reporting) authority.
OK it was possibly a poor judgement on her part, and immoral on his, but these things happen - and are genuinely consensual - which puts them in quite a different league to the "sex-pest" complaints.
We must be mindful of the fact that 30% (according to google) of relationships start at work - and it would not be fair to break this important process.
Hell, look at Bill Gates as a test case.
So, coercion has to be one of the critical tests, complaint another.
I'm quoting just £10,000, for a 250g moonrock, ready and waiting for the 'in-place' transfer of ownership.
I won't post the co-ordinates just yet - but It's the one just above the Buzz Aldrin footprint in the picture attached.
They can have the bigger one next to it if they'd rather.
By Jove, I think we might have cracked it :)
Presumably, if it has happened once, then there is a good chance it has happened several times.
The mechanism above would expect the now-equatorial polar accretions to melt, and new ones to form at the new poles.
There should be evidence of successive shell-flips. Each one would knock some mountaintops flat, increasing the opportunity for the next.
Could it simply be that the ice shell grew thicker at the poles - as they are likely to be colder for a number of reasons - until the moment of inertia for north-to-south rotation was higher than for regular east-west rotation?
At this point, an effect similar to the Wingnut effect or tennis raquet theorem came into play - forcing the system to rotate about the axis with the highest moment of inertia.
Essentially the previous rotation becomes energetically unstable and the system "flips".
The fact that it was a (large) 70 degree rotation might point to this, one would expect 90 degrees in a textbook situation.
Brilliant article, what a plot!..
Not sure luck had much to do with anything though - its good luck was to have skill, imagination and perseverance (heh) in its ground team.
I would love to have an idea of what resources it had, in terms of CPU, MHz, RAM, FLASH, etc? - just to get some sort of calibration.
the post above reminds me of the American tourist on the Isle of Skye:
Upon seeing two dogs copulating in the street, she assailed the local plod, complaining that it was an affront to dignity.
I'm sorry Madam, what do you suppose I should do about it ?
Can't you stop them? - give them a biscuit or something?
Madam, would you stop? for a biscuit?
This is where Reg units come to the fore, rather than gee-whizz quadrilllions, whatever the fuck they are.
It would bury Wales under a kilometer of rock, and no, there isn't that option, it is just informative.
(assumes density 2.5 ton/m3, a reasonable figure = 5 x 10^13 ton, 2 x 10^10 m2)
I appreciate that it might not be a good idea, but I certainly do not understand the implementation or the mechanisms involved.
Let me elaborate:
I had assumed that the passwords are not in some text file that any new browser can pick-up and incorporate.
The favourites possibly are in just such a file, OK maybe XML, and would be imported only upon my agreement when installing a new browser.
Chrome has me signed into gmail already, and I presume there is a cryptographic protocol, beyond HTTPs, that allows me to download emails only to Chrome that is signed-in, maybe a session key or something.
So, this - or better, another key - should be used for passwords also. They are either sent by google (best) or stored in an encrypted file locally (worst), and only decrypted the moment they are to be used. Only then is the clear text available - and possibly visible to the OS, which could be compromised, or to memory-inspecting malware, or malware that intercepts pre-HTTPS command stream.
These should not be visible to the new browser, to be pasted-in to the relevant fields, other than by following a similar protocol, basically being Chrome in a shiny wrapper.
Please could someone explain how my supposedly secret password list within Chrome, gets carried across to a MS program?
I don't really go for the last word in security, but I would like to keep the OS and its ginormous attack surface, away from passwords and away from gmail. Defence in depth is the idea, though maybe it's more like width, in this case.
The number of updates needed on Windows is witness to the complexity and scale of its attack surface, Chrome is a lot smaller even though it faces the whole internet.
I can't imagine google hands all my passwords over to MS, so, is it that there is google-controlled and secured chrome in a windowsy shitflake-sprinkled wrapper?
Why not just use Chrome then?
Why on earth do MS think that they have some sort of right to even attempt this in the first place?
Automatically installing security updates is bad enough, when it just chucks your work in the bin. It's worse now you get updates on the whim of some bling-obsessed marketroid, to 'get you there' with the latest shit functionality. For instance a snip tool that puts a lovely fucking red border round your screenscrape - and informs you it won't work for long as it's "moving" ?
So, erm, does anyone know how this works and who then I need to trust to keep it secure?
Many thanks to Anon, for throwing light on the topic. I'm not sure where to place £lon Musk, (lucky typo there, I'll keep it...) - he's very clever, yes manic, a born maverick, but has a downside also.
I'm inclined to give him the benefit of the doubt - and allow some "artistic license" - as we allow great artists, performers, inventors to be a bit different in their habits, because they are valuable outliers. Talent, is the word, it's rare and never perfect in all regards.
He has a condition, we understand that, and is given to outbursts and petty disputes. I can see that the stress of fatherhood presses against that, it is an open and undefined set of new constraints.
Just coming up with the "name?" has obviously done him in, somewhat.
In another form of judgement, the fact that the balance of genius and maverick has made him very successful puts him on the right side, the market has judged in his favour.
I think it is more contrast, than compare, with Toddler-in-Chief, TICOTUS - who has made millions only by virtue of starting with billions. The market judges that one to be neither use nor ornament.
There is no genius there.
Is there an "understatement of the week" prize?
Oh the joy of the challenge, to somehow encapsulate all the frustration, annoyance, anger that MS continues to deliver, into one phrase.
Shitflake sprinklers comes to mind, an unkind reference to the absurd and entirely juvenile re-modelling of Excel and Word, with thousands of choices of "sprinkles" - different styles each more ghastly and lurid - reminiscent of the cultural imposition of chemical flavouring "shots" and said shitflake adornments by the big-name coffee shops.
Perhaps their other superpowers ought to get a mention, "Processor heating engineers", "Renowned cycle stealers" - even as i speak, their "MS Teams" is busy consuming 50% of my 5000 MIPs - testing some poor register bit to beyond death - in order to find out whether I've offered call quality feedback yet, or not. How can starving children program that badly?
Oh, and the whole "you said you didn't want your room tidied, so I did it when you weren't looking, and all your stuff is in the garden" approach to updates - which combines all their previous skills, the fatuous functionality, hogging the processor till you submit to their will, and adds deliberately breaking autosave - which now only works if you store onto MS cloud, rather than disk - and deliberately deleting or hiding documents you were working on.
Maybe "productivity assassins", "teletype tinkerers" - given that most of it is tinkerage now, Excel 2003 was the high point, and the teletype is nearly as old - and it's what they started on.
I don't know, maybe they should also be lambasted for the cringing "world" adverts, making shit office software and pretending it's saving the world? - "Teletype visionaries" - any sort of mash-up of the above?
Have to agree with Reg though, it's best sorted out over a long lunch.
I'm hoping that the judgement might be challenged by logic, on the basis that "could I just be a highly skilled employee" is a one-way function.
Consultants are human, employees are human, so any position could be filled with either a skilled employee, or a consultant, therefore all consultants are employees. To argue otherwise requires you to be superhuman.
Both sides are wanting a differentiator.
Genuine consultants don't want their honest status to be subverted by artificial avoidance, like the train drivers (no harm to them they were forced into it) - who woke up to find they were independent train driving consultants.
HMRC would find their life a lot easier if they could make a fair differentiation that everyone can accept. We all would - can we define terms that declare with certainty whether one should be taxed by method A or method B?
Germany puts emphasis on working for more than one client within any given year - even if it's only 5% (my supposition). Also not having a fixed desk, a client business card, and a few other distinguishing terms HMRC could look to adopt.
My differentiators would be "cross-pollination" and "short-lived expertise".
Cross-pollination is a critical concept to the "value", in GDP terms, of the consultant/contractor market. Given the relatively slow flow rates of permanent employees between companies, the adoption of "best practice" can be, is, impeded.
Consultants accelerate this process. In my line of work, the rigour of automotive design and production is greatly welcomed in the new medical fields, it's a carry-across of familiar know-how. It's not in any way a "stealing" of one company's IP into anothers.
Conversely, the medical "life and limb" safety requirements and methodologies feed well into automotive ASIL ratings - the approaches, methodologies, burdens of proof.
So, a prototype "cross pollination" metric might ask if you are engaged for your general problem-solving ability, as could be met by a highly skilled employee, or for your experience and know-how.
Note that know-how is the third leg of IP:
Copyright, Patent and Know-how.
Some companies [RR] choose not to patent what they have discovered because patents only last 15-17 years and rely on full disclosure.
Short-term expertise covers the ASIC design phase, most companies that benefit greatly from custom silicon ASIC design, need it only once. The experts involved move on, it is a lesser task to manage the various implementations of the working ASIC.
It is a very much harder task, and therefore more valuable, to make ASICs that work.
If that is your skill, a permanent employment will not exercise it to the full.
By a similar token, contracting allows all highly skilled individuals to focus on their best skills, it is an imperative that one should strive to employ one's finest skills to the greater benefit of commerce and society.
I don't think that booby-trapping the entire workspace with ad-hoc factors and weights, undefined till in court, is any way to proceed with regard to harnessing the innate talent of the British to invent and consolidate said invention.
The sad truth is that marijuana is a lot safer in prisons than the legal highs they've all taken to recently.
I guess the "legal" stuff doesn't show up in tests that affect your parole and privileges.
But then you might end up mad or brain damaged, no-one knows.
If they can make an exception to the non-smoking rule for prisons, why not dope also, would calm things down, offer time for reflection, take the cartels with their punishment beatings out of system, all good things.
Oh yeah, but half of them are in there for that in the first place.
(actually 4000 for all drug offences in 85000 total)
The fines are just part of trying to sell into America, everyone gets clobbered at some point.
In a very big wide open space like America, I think NOx emissions are an excellent means of creating bio-available Nitrogen. Did you know that over half of the worlds biomass is down to humans working out how to fix Nitrogen?
I don't see why there's all this nonsense about NOx, makes me laugh it does.
I may be paranoid, but I see this as a perfect single point of leverage to get the US and EU patent systems "aligned".
From that point on we can expect a lot of money to go to America, and for innovation to be relentlessly trolled with heavy lawsuits, most of which will be settled with a cross-license deal, i.e. borged.
In this aspect, breaking it up is the only safe way forward.
1) Herd all the European Patent Law into one stadium
2) Make it drink the cool-aid
3) Bring the EU and US systems "into line"
4) Increase the patent lifetime to 75 years
Makes 30 Trillion look like chickenshit.
- basically, in the new lawyer-driven world, IP rights are a good means to tax the rest of the planet, or at least all those with a trading relationship with the USA. They prefer their patents to be granted freely, more IP to threaten others with, they don't even need to be original FFS, whereas ours do.
They spent countless money and lives on securing the last of the oil, what do you do when the oil runs out? - increase the patent lifetime and draw royalties from everyone and everything.
1) these databases get either hacked, or worse, sold.
Look at the oopsy-daisy wherein our NHS records in their entirety were passed to a trusted partner, unencrypted, on a USB stick. Parliament committee scolded the relevant tossers, but you can't get the shit back into the donkey.
Look also at the sale of DVLC records of your choice at £2.50 a pop - targeting posh car marques and fining them £100, mostly they just got the secretary to pay up. This was private data you were/are compelled to hand over.
2) cost of prosecution is our only defence against unworthy law
With costs involved, only the most serious laws get enforced, look at speeding for one instance, it used to be an occasional thing requiring active pursuit for 2/3 of a mile with lights flashing. Now it is easy to leave it permanently switched on. - Don't give me the "idiot tax" arguments, it is a minor transgression in most instances and not a great safety concern, statistically. Besides, first they came for the speeders..
Look at poll tax non-payment for another example, kangaroo courts prosecuting non-payers at 20 per hour. This made any legitimate rebellion, if there is such a thing in today's newspeak, impossible.
3) Finally, I would like the opportunity, as a responsible citizen, providing I do no intentional harm to others, the right to do whatever the fuck i like in private, with consenting adults of my choice. This may include unwise or immoral or simply depraved activities, not least of which might be the consumption of illicit substances.
How long before our self-appointed moral guardians work out that the casual drugs distribution chain shows up easily in this data, and can therefore be halted at very little cost?
For god's sake, we're human and have been doing this sort of thing since before the stone age.
Unlike the chinless cousin-fucking aliens that run our country.
Imagine a world where the first opamp, the 709, could not be functionally copied, and improved versions made that slot into the original socket. Where would we be if the microprocessor stopped at the 8080? If any other manufacturer can replicate the function, but without reverse engineering the actual chip, then that is legal and beneficial to all - except those who would prefer a lifetime monopoly. It's a shame since FTDI do make some newer parts (EVE) and these are every bit as ground-breaking as the '232. Come on guys, you've had a good run with this, let it go, and realise that copying the VID is no worse than copying a regular opamp pinout.
As ever, an interesting piece Mr. Worstall.
What do you think of the other members of the "dream team" of economists? Surely you must be appreciative that someone, anyone, in politics is thoughtful enough to seek advice from your lot, and thus to avoid so many of the obvious pitfalls. (My opinion, fwiw is that the law of unintended consequences can betray them, but I can't tell you how.)
Back on topic, sure governments are hopeless innovators, look at the technology in Brazil, the film, for inadmissible evidence.
I don't think we're even below-par on innovation - kickstarter, self-publishing, crowdfunding et al have changed the innovation landscape far more than Corbyn ever will, for the better that is.
He might want to address some more fundamental issues, like how to propel young bright minds out of eduacation-debt and into housing, before they're 30 and the edge has been ground off them.
On that topic, do you have any suggestions as to how we might deflate the property market so it stops being a monster investment for those offshore and starts to serve those who need it?
To what extent was it "cheating" is what I'd like to know.
It would be reasonable to save the finite supply of urea liquid for the times when the engine emits most NOx, under heavy acceleration (i.e driver demand, pedal position) and possibly also at lower revs. Similarly one might wait till the engine is warm otherwise the urea wont turn to gas within the exhaust and would be wasted. There is plausible denial so far, I would say.
If it measures actual rpm profiles and acts only on those that are a few percent within the standard test profiles, then that is definitely "test detection".. Similarly again, if there is a flag set for "test" conditions, and this remains set for some time, possibly the whole ignition cycle after a "cadence detection" of some sort, then sure, they're busted.
Where was it, actually, between these two levels?
Reg readers need to know.
"the most complex superconductor integrated circuits ever successfully yielded"
Yielded? - did they break it in half or something?
Oh, and it's "integrated circuit" not circuits.
Let's hope it's clever enough to teach the ignorant bastards some grammar.
Biting the hand that feeds IT © 1998–2021