Re: What has this got to do with a Supernova?
Tommy Flowers -
A fucking national hero and that he's not recoginsed as such is a fucking national disgrace.
377 publicly visible posts • joined 29 Nov 2011
@ Mr Flintstone
Whew! I'm not the only one! I've been leaving out entire words recently...must lay off the pints ;)
It's not easy to show remorse for something that really wasn't bad as such. He should have tempered his language though. Either way though it is still an entirely over the top sentence. Ultimately the only thing he really did wrong was going about his research the wrong way...and ending up in a court with a judge who is not tech savvy to the extent that the intricacies of this kind of work is understood.
I reckon the AT&T fine was just putting the boot in for the hell of it.
Firstly I feel I need to apologise for the above horror show of a post. Not in terms of spelling mistakes but rather missing entire letters out! Not good.
I also failed to be clear what my actual objection was.
The length of the jail sentence is far too extreme for the level of the "crime". Given that the data was available on a open web server. Rather than censuring AT&T for lax security the judge and prosecutors went after the security researcher. Not that he is entirely innocent...but at most he's guilty of foolishly not thinking through how to report his findings in a more...professional manner.
The only reason the guy was sentenced to a ridiculously long amount of time, and fined to boot, was because he made AT&T look foolish, and had emails of people in positions of influence and power. If all those emails had been ordinary folk I bet you he'd have never been sentenced to such a long time in prison.
Of course this is only my opinion and I could well be wrong and you would be right in presuming that I am typing this in a ranty rage. However it is quite clear that when it comes to computer "crimes" the US does tend to take things to an extreme...it either being driven by prosecutors wanting to make a name for themselves (and judges) or powerful people able to hire suits that the defendant just does not have the resources to compete against.
Pint coz well ranty rages are a thirsty business, right? ;)
When I'm looking to purchase new resources one of the first things on my mind is availability. Second in line is usually security. If a product, that has unfettered access to production environments, is not secure or is not able to show how secure it is then it just is not on the table as a viable option.
This not only includes the usual coding to secure standards but also support and the vendors incident response capabilities.
Seem to me that these guys fail pretty much on all fronts.
Easy solution? Give your techies the time and ability to thoroughly rip it to shreds and put it together again. Research the company and and reference sites as well as customers and see if they've had issues.
Cowboys in IT...do no one any favours.
AC 15:24 - this.
Not only financial services btw.
I'm not sure miss those midnight calls...in some ways quite fun to sort shit out but on the flip side the pressure to get it right first time is immense.
However its not only just flipping the bit..its also very much understanding the impact of that decision. If you fail over an entire DC you need to really be able to explain why...
Indeed. My point re ITIL...
It beggars belief that this has happened. Oh wait...no actually it doesn't. Seen a simple electrical fault take down a Tier Two dc...hit 6 companies hosting live revenue generating services. One company nearly went tits up.
Of course at RBS I expect a director to be promoted to a VP type position for this cock up.
Well not quite...according to the new Digital Overlords in the Cabinet Office small companies are encouraged to bid for work like this. If the bid is blocked due to "the stupid it burns" you are also encouraged to complain to the CO. The idea is that gov wants to move away from the big rip off merchants to regional SME's that actually have specific skills. Well...that is the plan.
Whether or not Maxwell et al survive the experience is yet to be seen.
Why stop at advertising booze? Make it across the board - ban ALL advertising. That I would happily support. My life would be far happier as well. The health benefits of a happy human compared to one under the kosh to buy this and that and whaterver else is really rather well known.
Pint coz I want one...and one not driven by advertising.
Western Market Capitalism is perfect, it's your perception of economic stagnation and a tech sector litigating itself to death that's faulty.
My god yer right! WMC is perfect...what with governments bailing out major corporations that love to trumpet how bad government is for business. I also love how the corps bleat about the "free market model", which when it goes tits up then demand that the government bail them out...which is the exact opposite of the model they profess to support. Of course its all bollocks because the corps will cry that they are too big to fail...well...perhaps if you followed a different model, had proper compliancy controls in place, auditors who would be legally obligated to report corp malfeasance to regulators for example, corporate officers held responsible for illegal acts (prison time for you Mr Money Launderer/LIBOR fixer et al), MBA's who are taught to run a business....not monetize everything within an inch of its life. I happen to believe that capitalism is a great model only when it is going hand in hand with a good and decent policy of social responsibility. Otherwise its a monster that will eat all in its path....led by a handful of sociopathic bastards.
/rant
The litigation/patent troll thing is frankly totally out of hand and does no one any favours besides short sighted lawyer types and VP's who can't see more than a half move ahead.
Pint for us all surviving the "Mayan Apocalypse".
Why the fuck is this shit being published on el reg? What part of this partisan fuckwittery has anything to do with IT?
I know! Absolutely fuck all. Not only that but it is blatant bollocks to boot, as has been shown by quite a few commentards so far. Both for and against.
Hopefully this is the last piece of "economic" reporting from Mr Worstall.
Pint for the remembering to close the door on yer way out.
No corporation tax? Really?
http://www.hmrc.gov.uk/rates/corp.htm
As for the morality ( because that is what you are arguing...an opinion and not fact)s you can take your Randiod bollocks and shove it where the sun don't shine.
Your 'article' is one of the most pathetic sophomoric pieces I've read in a long time. Even UKIP policy papers contain more intelligence than the tripe you're peddling.
Indeed...I remember the programme..."Superwaves" on the beeb - broadcast back in the early 2000's I think.
Some of the prog was pretty spot on...that rogue waves are a reality and far more common than originally thought. Then in a fit of Discovery Channel inspired sensationalism they went slightly OOT about the Canaries and the "Superwave"...1000 metres high travelling at 600Km per hour...utter bollocks.
I really hate Discovery Channel.
Next time our American colleagues attempt a higher than thou stance when it come to intelligence agencies just point out that without Ian Fleming there would be no CIA. That would be the proper CIA...not the political tool after the the USAF/CIA pig fight...where the CIA disputed the number of Sov bombers when the USAF was looking at presenting a new budget. A few years later the CIA learned its lesson and played the game in the "missile gap" controversy.
Pint coz it makes it easier to digest bollocks politics.