Hippie
"...but only if it dumps today's inefficient hippie technology."
Yes, because you can't apply an ad hominem against a technology unless you anthropomorphise it first.
6 publicly visible posts • joined 15 Nov 2011
"Private litigation to block rogue websites is succeeding where SOPA failed."
This is how copyright should be protected. It's the copyright holder's responsibility to protect their holdings using their own resources.
"In Ireland, music rights group IRMA has filed a high court action to compel the government to block sites..."
This is the wrong way. Copyright holders can't expect the taxpayers to foot the bill to monitor and corral the horses that they let out of the barn.
"...but we'll not be recycling any other parts of the old chap any more than we'll be building a chassis out of granddad's femurs. That also means anyone else who wants to have a crack can use our designs without having to buy a Mowbot first..."
That also means...granddad's femurs are still available for your other projects.
Maybe YOU should read more often. The corp-spokes-liar says that CIQ captures keystrokes but that they they don't collect them through their own filter. But he also says that the CARRIER is the one who sets their own filtering policy. He makes no statement about what the carriers filter and collect. If the software captures it the carrier can collect it. You've misinformed yourself based on your own bias toward the corps and against the privacy critics.
@Kane
Google doesn't make the handsets, only the OS. Firmware is produced by the carrier / manufacturer pair.