Re: Competition at last?
"Optane is not supported on AMD."
Why not? Optane is just an SSD.
148 publicly visible posts • joined 13 Nov 2011
"Microsoft ... invest our resources towards more recent technologies so that we can continue to deliver great new experiences."
Apart from shiteware like cortana, metro interface, edge etc., is there any technology that is useful in Windows 10 that Vista (or stable OSes like XP or NT4.0 come to think of it) did not have?
Great article!
I guess at some point larger on chip CPU SRAM caches and low latency high bandwidth Flash based non-volatile storage combine to make DRAM redundant for many low end systems.
I still wonder though why the DIMMs fitted to current high end machines have not yet dumped DRAM in favour of SRAM. For applications that are not so sensitive to price and power consumption (a high end gaming rig for example) the lower latency of the SRAM would give a useful performance boost.
The WIMPs interface was a mature technology 20 years ago, anything that was worth adding to Windows was added to it years ago.
MS should concentrate on debugging and rewriting its bloated Windows software, not producing a bunch of new crap that no one outside of MS marketing department is remotely interested in.
Very few people want an onshore wind turbine anywhere near their backyard, not least because of the negative impact on house prices. As for the eye wateringly high price of offshore wind, that has been well and truly undercut by cheap Chinese built solar panels.
NASA confined itself to low earth orbit for half a century when it foolishly scrapped Apollo style capsules in favour of the winged Space Shuttle. Winged spacecraft have lower reentry speeds and squander payload mass boosting both wings and the undercarriage into space, which is why the Russians (Soyuz) and SpaceX have stuck with capsules and parachutes for re-entry and landing.
Let's hope that there is an outbreak of common sense before NASA wastes too much more money on winged or lifting body space vehicles..
So, lots of potential payload mass wasted carting the lifting body shape and the undercarriage into space each flight.
Honest to goodness Apollo style parachutes work just fine, are far lighter, and do not result in loss of vehicle if the glide approach to the runway is screwed up (No Buran-style jet engines for a go around).
Why is NASA wasting money on this frivolity?
Bio diesel is terrible stuff for the environment, especially when burnt in an old car. Bio fuels take farmland out of growing useful food, increasing fuel prices so the poor go hungry, whilst diesel engines degrade air quality with carcinogenic particulates. Fracked shale gas to power CNG vehicles is a better option; lower CO2 emissions than petrol or diesel and much cleaner exhaust emissions.
Well said Lewis.
The wind energy industry needs to go and put its collective thinking cap on and come up with a solution to how to keep the lights on when the wind does not blow, other than relying on the existing fossil fuel fired infrastructure that produces all the CO2 that the enviros are so exercised about. Until then, the UK should be building nukes.
We switched from Comcast to phone company internet at the start of this year, ditching ad laden cable TV in the process.
We were concerned that Verizon internet would not be fast enough to stream video across, but its performance seems similar to what we were getting from Comcast cable at a fraction of the price, so we made a good move :-)
""He was wrong, but could anybody have reliably predicted it at the time?"
Bollocks, it didn't take the brains of an Archbishop to see that Elop, Windows Phone and Nokia were a slow motion train wreck.
Re my El Reg comment of the 15th August 2012 :-
"Long shot The best thing that Nokia can now do is to fire Elop and switch to the Android platform.
It would be messy, but it would offer Nokia their best chance of survival as an independent company."