Re: Looks like a good way to launder money
The "Art world" is only for laundering money.
248 posts • joined 4 Nov 2011
Not sure why Starlink wouldn't just agree to have all China based customers connections sent back down to only China based base stations.
Regardless of what you think of a counties laws, if you want to provide products/services you follow that countries laws. Musk is quite paly with the CCP.
Let’s educate you a little, or try
Starlink sits in very low earth orbit, below the operational height of almost all other sats.
Due to this low orbit, sats fall back to earth within 5 year max for the high test ones and with 3 months at launch orbits even if they lose all power. This is also the reason nobody else is using these orbits, the atmospheric drag is large at this altitude.
As for observations, when starship flys it will be cheaper to Launch a telescope into orbit than to ship it up a remote mountain. Telescopes should be in space and not below 100km of atmosphere.
They cut and pasted their own code, from the capsule to the service module, but then didn’t update what lookup tables it used.
If not spotted and rushed patched, when the two parts separated, the service module would have used completely wrong thrust, then try to self correct using even more incorrect thrust and so on until it’s out of thrust or has crashed back into the capsule.
Boeing sent multiple, untested, unvalidated software patches, written on the fly to the star liner whilst on mission, just to get it to return safely and it still failed to reach the iss.
The approach and docking at the iss hasn’t been tested.
Let’s not forget this was a proof it all works mission. That without direct intervention would have resulted in total loss.
Use Methane Oxygen fuel on a fully reusable rocket. As the Methane has to be Made and not from any natural as source (due to purity requirements). The methane is made using the Sabatier process from CO2, and Hydrogen from hydrolysis of Water. Which also generate the O2 needed.
Powering this by solar panels and sourcing the CO2 from the air makes launches carbon neutral.
Thus you can launch a rocket into space polluting less than the truck used to move the payload to the rocket.
We are getting there.
The world’s most powerful supercomputer is 148 *10E16 Flops and uses 13MW of power.
A human brain is in the same order at estimated processing power between: 0.9 and 33.7 * 10E16 FLOPS but uses just 25W.
Our brains are also hardware and software combined with a lot of pre-programming (some of which is not helpful)
But just think we still take over a year to become slightly self-aware, another year to learn basic language and become conscious, another 4 to get the hang of reading and writing, another decade to make complex decision and still most of us can see the limits of our cognition.
How much does your amature scope weigh?
At the proposed $2M cost per 150T launch, thats $13 a KG!
Nobody seems to relise how transofrmational that cost per KG really is...
The $2 is including Paying $900,000 for fule. Which SpaceX is going to make for free using Tesla solar pannels, a compressor and the Sabatier process.
Also includes $1M to NASA for Florida launch complex cost. Boca is SpaceX owned and being preped for full launches. $100K for maintance per launch.
Viewing the universe thorough an atmosphere is far from ideal.
The answer is what the vast profit from starlink enables. That being StarShip at a cost of $2M to get 150T to LEO, if launched from a NASA complex. It's less than $1m if launched from Boca. Thats less than the cost of lugging 150T up a chillian mountain top!
All telescopes should be space based, its just the vast cost of launching that's prevented that. As the launch cost is so high, sats have to be made not to possible fail, adding yet more cost.
Just imagin what can be built with a $1-2M launch cost, weighing 150T and at 9 Meter wide faring!
Does make me wonder how much success Musk has to have before the naysayers eat their words.
The sats deorbit from drag within 3 months if they break before reaching target orbit.
They deorbit within 5 years at the highest target orbit for starlink.
Very few other sats in these low orbits, because the drag makes their lifespan short.
This batch have the auto avoidance system enabled and should self move out of the way of any potential issues.
Why is anybody on the reg if you don’t want super low latency gigabit internet anywhere.
Then again loads of reg readers still think digital watches are a pretty neat idea.
Really starts to point out why Starship is going to be a stainless steel tank with some thrusters and engins.
All this compelx abort, complex staging, complex landing kit. complex recovery, complex hypergolic fuel handling, complex parachutes. its all just so many points of failure.
Cant wait or the next 5 to 10 years, Startship will be pottering about the solar system, landing on the moon, mars and building bigalo stations.
NASA will be still waiting for the SLS and planning a few dozen stages, super complex crafts, using 1960s technology to get to the moon but be nowhere near it.
Commerical is sorted.
SpaceX is building Starlink. This will be a gloabl internet provider, offerign 1GBit internet, at low latency, connects to anywhere on earth for a subscription. This will print money, as in Billions upon billions.
Now with infinite money and private investors who all are buought in on owning Mars or can be bought out easily, commericals just don't matter anymore. This is why starship will carry 150T per alunch and can launch 3 times per day per ship. Thats a whiole ISS per day per ship! Its sure a hell not for any kind of earth orbit payloads. Its for colonising mars in a BIG way.
Is it just me, or are BT saying they are binning G.FAST as they woudl put FTTP in the SAME PLACE!
So rather than leaving the G.FAST as that and using the resorces to make more FTTP happen. They are going to re-do the same locations that have already got G!
They really dont want to roll out to the rest of the UK, just keep upgrading the same cheery picked locations!
Glad this issue has been found before they launch the 1000s of them. Gives insight that the auto maneuvering isn't live yet, just like the between sat coms. Long way to go to get LEO constlations up and running, but thats what testing is for.
For those bashing Tesla's autopilot, have you tried it verses say Toyota lane-keeping assistant? Tesla drives nicly down the road, will go around parked cars, overtakes (on multi lane roads) works nicely almost all of the time. Toyotas latest and greatest system will only keep you in lane and does so like its very drunk, swerving from one side to the other then setting off alarms as IT dives over the lines and thats when the road is clealy marked. Anywhere where its not, the car drives in the middle-ish of the road!
Ping is lower. Do some maths :)
Speed the latest fibre cable from NY to Spain has an average transmission speed of just 121,212kph, just on the 4,000km cable, + transmission times from the end of the cable to the endpoints.
Now the Speed of light in the atmosphere is 299700kph. The speed of light in vacume 299792kph.
Can you see where this is going? If you're only broadcasting from source to to Very low earth orbit, accross and back down direct to target, Starlink will have substantially lower ping for translatic coms and the advantage grows the further the points are away from each other. Even a few ms lower will have a huge finical gain to the high-frequency traders.
The only reason old school Sat coms is pants is a Geostationary orbit round trip is a minimum of 72,000 KM.
Vega book cost is $37m per launch for just 1,450kg to LEO.
A used Falcon9 launch is about the same cost now and can do 13,500kg to the same orbit.
The UEA could have launch both sats on the same Flacon 9 for the same price as this one on a Vega rocket.
Falcon9 does more successful launches per year than the Vega has ever done and after this failure is actully more reliable including its earlier failures.
Just dont use a Northrop Grumman deployment (use SpaceXs as that works).
Or to rather to Mr Musk.
A Whole falcon 9 is $60m if you want a completely new one.
Less than $40m for a one careful user with a full service history.
This is book price before any discounts or ride sharing.
After this crash the Flacon now has better reliability than the Vega, with a vastly superior payload and orbital injection capability.
Having worked in the online gambling industry I can say the Poker companies are not doing this themselves.
Its FAR more profitable and less riskly just to provide the service and take a cut of buyin/stakes/winnings. or provide a winning pot and take the business.
Just like when people say a roulette is riged, they miss the point that all the house needs is a small odds in its favor (as is the design of the normal game) and them to play enough games.
33s to make a move is unacceptably slow for real work cases. However I can't see the researchers not having a copy of the code to "try" at home.
And so after years of Intel siting on their assess, price gouging and not innovating, they are now several years behind Ryzen architecture benifits. Whilst AMD is accellerating away with Ryzen 3 this year and 4 due next year, all before Intel has anything close to competing with the Ryzen 3. HOw many years will it take for Intel to bring the connector fabirc to market and designed and fab chips onto it? 5 years?
Chiplets makes a huge difference in the overall cost, as you get vastly greater yeilds making lots of small chipsets on a new fab process (AMDs approach) than you do for single monster sized chips (Intel's approach).
Not one person so far has point out thats a LOT of money just made in a quick amount of time.
The one thing I knows if there's a boatload of cash to be made, copies and even better versions will be fast coming.
Agree with the point that once this is common and you can do it on your phone, nudes will quickly lose their power and become as mundane as the bunny ears that even politicians use these days.
Thinks forgotton. These sats deorbit within 2 years maximum if they fail.
If SpaceX gets this up and running, it will be the making of SparShip (BFR) (Starlink is the proposed long term funding source for SpaceX). At which point it will make Heavy lifting so economical that we should move our future telescopes into space. A 100t to geo and a 9-meter faring make a very large telescope. You could pack the James web in without having to fold the mirror! A huge weight and faring makes designing a large space teliscope vastly cheaper.
Next up who doesnt want fast internet accesable gloally?
Forget the other consitlations appart from Jeffs. The only way to complete is to have a cheaper launch capacity, which is impossible unless you own the rocket manufacturing and can make rockets reusable and ten use only rockets somebody else has already paid for with previous flights. The economics of SpaceX really shine on this one.
I'll make this easy.
Humans emit 35,900,000,000,000KG of CO2 per year and climbing. 1KG of CO2 is enough to fill two baths. Just try and let that number sink in, its huge,
Plants, all of them from the algae in the seas to the forests ran out of capacity to absorb the extra carbon a long time ago. Plans currently taking about half of what we emit. The remaining 17,950,000,000,000KG is accumulating the in the atmosphere per year and every extra KG we emit just stays there. This is why the atmospheric CO2 levels are now skyrocketing. To scale, if you take an average model globe, the atmosphere would be as think as the paint!. It’s not big at all.
CO2 is a greenhouse gas. It traps heat from the Sun in the atmosphere. The more CO2 the more heat is retained from the sun and so the hotter the global average temperature is. We can track the historic CO2 levels (over billions of years) in the atmosphere and they map perfectly onto average global temperatures with a slight lag.
This process is lagged, thus if you put vast amount of CO2 in the atmosphere it takes a few years for the temperature to rise to its new equilibrium temperature. If the CO2 drops it take a good few years for the Earth to cool down. As you may have noticed the earth is quite large and it take a LOT of energy to heat the oceans up, but they store a lot of energy when heated even a little.
Best case we lose most of the ice on Antarctica, and all of it on Greenland, Siberia and the sea levels rises at least 20+ meters. This is already inevitable, the last time CO2 was this high, that had already happened. Now where do humans put all their capital cities? How much of our land is 20M or less than sea-level? Do you like hurricanes, as warmer oceans make them larger and more common.
Worse case is the ocean circulation stops, because of excess fresh water at the polls and warm water at the polls. This has also happened before when CO2 was high and it resulted in the extinction of 99% of all life on earth.
Well no the actual worse case is we hit a tipping point where the system runaways and we make Earth like her sister planet – Venus.
So producing 900 a day cars without the demand?
Considering they are made to order, what deam world are you living in? Which car company do you work for? Tesla doesnt dump their stock on a dealership like the fossil car makers do. They get an order online, put it into the production and then post our our car, done.
Also you can lok at the offical registration figures each month, seems they are reistering (hence sold) record numbers at the moment in the USA.
Not sure why they thought the RTX woudl be good for mining anyways.
Vega has any Nvida card smashed in Hash per $, Vega Vii is the king, as GPU mining is usually limited by Memory bandwidth. 1TBs HBM2 on Vii compared to 616GB/s on a 2080ti (even a moderatly overclocked memeory on a old Vega 64 has more memeory bandwidth than a 2080Ti).
So ridiculously overpriced RTX series not fit for mining, even if ETH price was still high, Gamers getting not a lot more for 2x the price. But will they do the sensible thing and drop the margins to clear the stock? Nope they will just delay launching anything new untill the old crap is gone.
The laws of physics can be changed and physics are trying to do it, it's just that any change must still agree with the known experimental results.
Einsteins GR agrees with Nutons Laws most of the time, just when you go to more extremes, Newton's laws don't match the data and Einstein's do.
We know the laws of physics are not complete, Einstein's rules don't work in quantum systems and quantum rules don't work at large scales. Both are outstandingly accurate at predicting the results of experiments at their respective scales. Thus any grand theory must predict both to the same or better accuracy.
Feeding a machine learning system all the results and ask it whats the underlying maths is, may just work. If us dumb monkies understand that maths is another matter.
I have a solution,
Comes with Ultra HD light sensors capable of detecting a drone miles away.Super sensitive audio with the ability to differentiate between a drone and anything else in all environments. Can fly in all environments, well past what any drone can handle. Can identify a target in all environments.
Self-navigating and return to base operation.
Top speed of 240MPH. Flight time in the hours.
Able to take out any drone, even ones performing evasive maneuvers.
This tech has already been proven working for this exact job.
It's called a Flacon and they already do it
People do need it. Some of us already get much better speeds from a 4G connection than BTs "boardband" internet. Some of us use 4G as our main home connection with an Unlimited data contract.
Some of us are waiting for 5G to come along and will be upgrading the card in our routers to connect to it...
5G could actually offer solid competition to landlines in villages, especially on Three as they have the most frequency allocation, but it does mean they will have to actually upgrade the towers.
Im supprised this story is for Vodaphone, dint think they had 3G yet, sure dont anywhere I've lived.
Out in the sticks of Essex, I've moved from BT landline internet to Three.
My Speeds went from 15/1 Mbps to 35/15 Mbps. Price from £44 down to £24.
Three do unlimited data contracts.
I can see 5G, if rolled out to all their towers seriously compleating with landlines. If I was on EE here I would get 96Mbps down, as their tower is on a later LTE generation than the Three tower.
Whilst not Rare in their total amount in the Earths crust. They are not present in veins of high purity anywhere.
They are present at a low concentration in loads of places. Which makes them expensive to extract and purify.
Just like there is 9,000 tons of gold in the seawater, its concentration is so low as to make it very hard to get out.
Let's hope the recent price decreases in Flash continue. There was a time when HDD days where looking very numbered, with flash only a few generations behind superseding it in both storage volume and price per GB. Then the cartel price fixing started, flash price rocketed and HDD crept up in capacity to keep us all in the past just a little bit longer.
For storage space, SSDs are already king at over 30TB. It's just the artificially inflated $GB that's saved HDDs so far.
You remove low paid, low skilled checkout workers. They are replaced by fewer, but much higher paid engineers, designers, installers and sellers of high tech automated till systems and the economy grows and fills the gap of employment left from the loss of low skilled jobs.
This is how industrialisation works and has done for a few hundred years. May surprise you but nobody is hand ploughing the fields any more.
At least there will be a fix and rolled out to all.
The various android devices I have are all on different, old and with known vulnerablities versions without any way of updating beyond hope.
My i thinks are all up today and some of them are quite old for a consumer product.
A level biology is NEVER going to get you to the level of tinkering with Biology. Its WAY WAY harder than that, Just the concepts of how a multi-gene system work is hard at degree level and that's just the basics of genetics.
Anybody with the knowledge to make a superbug knows this doesn't work. It's possible to make a killer virus, you can't tailor it, Humans are Humans, we are all the same stock. there are no differences to separate out targets. Also, Evolution happens regardless if you like it or not, so any pathogen release today will not stay as you created it.
This is why is totally and utterly band and not violated. As its just DUMB. Nobody wants to wipe out all of humanity even if they do want to wipe out group X based upon some ideological reason.
As for Editing Humans, It would be nice if we could. Our Genome is a MESS, its riddled with errors, our biology has so many evolution hang-ups that no "designer" would ever accept its unbelievable. we are weak, slow healing, prone to lots of diseases, have poor eyesight, hearing, short-lived etc etc.
The issue is it's Ridiculously hard to even come up with what should be revised let alone what shoudl be coded in there and then finally doing it.
CRISPA allows a single gene to be edited, a few thousand bases out of 3 billion. What's needed is a full rewrite.
I call bullshit and utter misinformation.
1) In the EU, you are not allowed to grow and sow your own Seeds. This is a long-standing policy to stop inbreeding crops over and over again, as it leads to disaster (weak plants that get wiped out by a single disease). Or just idiots like yourself.
2) int the EU we don't have any GM crops growing outside of control trials, mostly due to idiots like yourself have just enough knowledge to be stupid but not enough to have any idea what's going on.
3) The first GM crops were for longer shelflife tomatoes, only later crops were for resistance to a natural herbicide (Roundup) and to produce a natural pesticide present in the soil. Yep the Genes for GM come from other natureal sources, we just dont have the tech to come up with noval proteints ourself and evolution does a way better job.
4) We don't eat anything "natural" anymore, Not by GM, but by thousands of years of Selective Breeding. - Wheat doesn't looks like grass any more, Pigs are far from the natural boar. A while Banana is hardly recognisable compared to the organic one in the shops.
More sanctions! They already can't buy anything from the west as Western banks don't accept payment originating in Iran.
America used its stick for nothing in return, now Iran is free to pursue its own stick to trade for an even better deal, whilst also getting closer to the ultimate safety stick of being Nuke armed.
No Nuke armed country has ever been invaded.
Every time America sanctions Iran, Iran gets closer to ICBMs and gets a new and better deal.
Shame really as the Iranians I have spoken too are all really nice well-educated people.
Biting the hand that feeds IT © 1998–2022