Re: So to paraphrase "MS Using Fat Gits for development."
"feel the buglyness" - ftfy
1997 publicly visible posts • joined 4 Nov 2011
> Econ 101 tells me that if there is no supply, then odds are the demand isn't there.
Or that the supply side is an effective monopoly. Or the distribution side is an effective monopoly.
With most phones sold via carriers, it's probably both of those. Manufacturers spec their product not for the end user but for the carrier, in practice.
> ... the vast majority of the world disagrees with you and thinks Windows 10 is more polished than Linux Mint
Would that be because they've tried both and then made a well-informed decision, I wonder? Or because they're too dim to realise that there's an alternative to having GWX perform unwanted surgery on their computers?
> ...at MS, they must spend a lot of time figuring out ways to get open software to fail to properly render an MS Office document
I don't think they need to. MSOffice makes such a dog's breakfast of layout, font, etc. that it's pretty much a given that well-designed software would struggle with it.
> One assumes, further, that it may become illegal to pass any directions as to where you can find the instructions on how to install such software.
Since URLs are not (and never were) any more a "communication to the public" than telephone numbers, yours is the only possible interpretation of the ruling (i.e. it is not the URL per se, but telling people about it, that constitutes a "communication to the public"). Your only error is in using the wrong tense: "may become" rather than "is".
systemd
-free Devuan Linux hits version 1.0.0
> I'm puzzled by people that raise the bogey man of "binary logging"
I'm puzzled that anyone thought binary logging was of any use whatsoever. Saying it's not a problem because you can fix it with yet another piece of otherwise unnecessary baggage is rather unhelpful.
> It's an elegant system that works with easily understandable text-based configuration files
No, it's not elegant, and the config files are no easier to understand than the scripts used previously.
> A change of init system isn't something we should be doing more than once every couple of decades
Agreed, but systemd is not an init system (hint: init is an init system). Systemd is spaghetti architecture - even calling it "architecture" at all is generous, of course.
> Apple lost my vote when they decided to just up and abandon PowerPC even though they were selling machines with those chips in them just months before the announcement.
Apple lost my vote when they decided to just up and abandon 68000 even though they were selling machines with those chips in them just days before the announcement.
> it is quite refreshing to be able to count on policy being largely driven by actual economic and social needs rather than short-term, egotistic political interests.
Notr that I'm disagreeing with you general point, but in any other context, that would have been phrased as "... driven by big-business and self-serving pressure groups...".