
@ James
It's = IT IS or IT HAS
220 publicly visible posts • joined 2 Nov 2011
No. GPS is pretty awful at doing altitude. Check out the fact that there is a separate vertical accuracy figure in GPS data.
You must be trolling. Do you not think that there are quite a few people who have experimented with this in the 18 years GPS has been operational? Including millions who have such a function embedded in their mobile phones?
This is also the reason that aircraft rely on other mechanisms for collision avoidance.
Agreed. The human brain seems much more similar to a mesh network than to a multitasking single core.
Not to mention multi-tasking is just a clever way of saying 'time-sharing'. If you try to do too much of it then you end up thrashing about doing endless task switching and paging (whether you are human or digital).
"the utility of carrying around a laptop... is gone. Forever."
That is just one opinion, and the way it looks to me cannot translate successfully into a general observation. There are just too many reasons for different people why a laptop or a desktop is still, and will always be, significantly superior.
it sounds like he is in a similar mood to me today.
Why can't a prominent company like APC make a web page that you can download software from by clicking on a link to the software you want to download? How do they make such a basic function into so difficult a problem?
Come to think of it, it seems this is an endemic issue. The web is so laden down with all this Web2.0 'you bum me and I'll bum you back' rubbish that no-one can make a web site that actually works for simple things like a discussion forum or downloading files any more.
VMWare's web site doesn't work either.
"Sorry, you are not authorised to download that software because you don't have a key for it in your account"
"Here is your key for ESXi 4.1"
"Sorry you can't add that key to your account because that key already exists in your account"
o.O
"...it could be used to startle any burglars into leaving a rather smelly DNA depositary behind as they dash for the window in which they entered."
Not only is this a horribly-formed sentence, but 'depositary' is an incorrect spelling of the wrong word.
It's also worth mentioning that faeces do not reliably contain DNA, as such comprises waste products from food, and not necessarily cells that have been made in the body.
Although el Reg comprises journalists and not systems administrators, I am sure they can successfully set up a new box for corrections on their existing, working messaging system.
Which means that someone has received the messages, and that person has decided to ignore them and not carry out their job properly.
because I want to be informed of the news.
I have submitted a number of corrections over the last week. They are all obvious and easy to correct. However, none of the corrections have been made and no kind of feedback has been received.
Of course I waited a reasonable time to confirm that my observations were correct before making a statement as such.
I call shenanigans on this new 'feature'. It is a total joke.
Loyal Reg readers, do not bother to kindly notify el Reg of any corrections you may notice are required in the articles. Your submissions will not be taken notice of.
This 'feature' has been created specifically to completely ignore and turn a blind eye to the lack of quality, rampant technical inaccuracy and complete absence of an editorial process evident from typical Reg articles.
I disagree. Those that use equipment from the church of the fruit are just as appalling as everyone else when it comes to spelling and grammar. They just make it look prettier.
A comment on your sentence, though: it is poorly-formed and contains too many commas. Maybe you should leave picking fault with others' English (overlooking the fact that in the OP it was deliberate) to more intelligent individuals?
Your assumptions are inaccurate.
I generally disagree with the ethos of Apple Computer. However, I do own a MacBook Pro (on which I mainly run Windows) as it is a superior quality piece of equipment.
I would not choose to part with my own money in return for either an iPhone or iPad.
So I probably don't fit into your definition of "iTard", sorry.
Regardless, wilful ignorance (not necessarily misuse by itself) of the English language is reprehensible and should always be countered with stern vituperation.