Printers
Wondering if fax machines are still being produced despite their continuing use
145 publicly visible posts • joined 16 Jun 2007
Who would have thought that AI would mirror and magnify the best and worst traits of humans. I was really struck by the parallel between AI collapse and the collapse of leaders. Often powerful leaders get stuck in the same pattern of believing their own bs and losing perspective. The thing that determines how long they last is when people don't get what they want from kowtowung to the power. The power we are giving to AI (the computer says it so it must be so) is horrifying. Almost as horrifying as the power we give to political, business, military and law enforcement. Post Office, tainted blood etc.
AI means human information in, inhumanity out, just like life
The real issue highlighted is having those who code and develop able to listen properly to the end users, not just the buyers and waters. Also vice versa.
AI is not going to do that. And the folks with the money won't want either their wants to be wrong, or changed. So end users and receivers of services will be over ruled, and forced to make it work and will not be heard so they just get on with it. . And then when things start to slide, non end users will wonder why and what went wrong, and where did these weird end runs come from and why they are cluttering up their perfect products.
It has always happened and with AI there is another even more inflexible slae driver. "If AI says it, then it must so!" And if unhelpful chatbots are anything to go by, God is our only hope!
Often as in this article, the term "The state" is used. More properly it is individuals in power positions rather than the anonymous "state". Using state implies a non stoppable machine like process rather than individuals abusing and over reaching or changing the use of power in ways that are undemocratic and harmful to the very people the government is charged with ensuring their well being and protection.
While individuals are mentioned, Trump, McCarthy the emphasis should always be on the individuals abusing the power rather than some amorphous, unstoppable state apparatus.
For the people, by the people
The most useful comment among all the verbiage was that he doesn't have a metric to measure success.
Why buy something you don't know how to measure.
It is also through the process of hiring and onboarding that relationships are built. Taking the routine out of the human process leaves less to work with.
I guess we are stuck with this, but it is workers who will get paid less for the chairman's pension scheme!
I have seen the current non AI computer systems not actually work, on a huge scale e.g. Birmingham CITY council, just one council waste 250 million (quarter of a billion pounds!!) on an Oracle system that is never going to work and worse, make losses of potential promised savings, planned for, for years to come. Horizon - well we all know that one. The Canadian govt payroll susytem that bankrupted some employees. The HR system that was introduced by my employer with the specific promise that it worked fine in tbhe pilot, now being replaced. In part the finance department in a massive trust in their employees and a Scrooge like fist on finances did not pay for the orientation module, a modest 1% of total cost. The result was predictable, as a simple Google search would have shown. Some over paid for non entitled time off, under payments, TIME WASTED!
And speaking of Google, they could really help the world by not wasting the cash on these huge white elephants and just build some affordable housing. With all those brains they might even build a better home.
It is simply horrific this waste, not the money, that is bad enough, but the waste of human potential, and betterment, you know, the pursuit of happiness.
All we get these days is misery.
The distinguishing mark of Google was that it delivered in a simple way, what the customers wanted.
The example of the AI scraping customer comments to deliver something they want is going to be skewed given that these are self selecting and also by fake responses. It seems like another investment in time and learning by employees in a system that will not deliver.
Given that many current IT systems, particularly the large one don't deliver even the kown goals eg Birminham Council IT extravaganza, ans the many many expensive failures to build integrated health care informtation systems, this is looking like "good" money (ie from the poorer masses) going after bad and ending up in off shore accounts. Money for nothing and ....
The companies reporting that they are using AI are just estimates - unreliable at best.
To say that you ouoght not to measure ROI with the massive investment figures being quoted is reprehensible. Spend money but we're not going to be able to know if it will be worth it. - That is no way to run a business - or a government!
What a world!
I note that UK was not mentioned as an option for relocation.
Immigration into UK is now over 600,000 a bit more than than the target in Camerons reign of 20,000.
All since 2016.
How ironic that Brexit was sold by having control over immigration and ended up by not having any control whatsoever.
Given that EU citizens have a high standard of education, even replacing them with developing country citizens is going to deskill the UK workforce.
Consequence - smart companies will avoid UK!
As a personal consumer ho is the last printer I would buy based on my corporate experience. While corporates are essentially pushing the snooze button on complaints and prices, at some point they will wake up and ditch hp. HP is thinking like Kodak and Swiss watch makers.
Far better to copy the pharma model when generics become available. Either cut your prices to a smaller premium or set up their own cheaper alternative and keep the market with a better product. We all have had experience of cheap ink.
Holding people to ransom is not a long term strategy for success.
Court calculations are by nature not exact, indeed far from it.
Also, the early 20th century US had many more fires than current figures even. Modern fire detection and expanded populations ensure that more fires are counted. Insurance losses are greater per fire..
More transparency is required.
Additionally, what proportion of the notional blame needs to be apportioned to government policy, or even individuals who heated homes with fossil fuels.
For me the bottom line is forget the blame game, we have decided for various reasons to change. Lets put the energy and creativity to that task!
So incentivising off peak electric charging makes me wonder what off peak will actually end up being.
If we all go electric, peak demand will be overnight presumably which will make it the new peak.
Indeed, I suspect that going all electric for everything will mean no peak or off peak at all
Just moved to Northern Ireland which although technically part of the UK is not mentioned here. That is not unusual I understand. I live in a square patch in the coverage which is an island of lower connectivity for reasons which seem to belong to the x files. Often I am restricted to 3G or less (according to my phone apparently).
Given that current talk is that NI is twenty years behind the rest of the UK, that might be a blessing. I'm figuring I won't last that long anyway for age reasons.
Alao.wondering what is going to happen to all that lovely copper wiring literally lying around in the the future. Will the price drop and its not worth digging up, or will.it be worth it?
How about making the tech that the gov has already made a mess of work. Horizon - Royal Mail (screw the sub postmasters so they lose lives and homes and no acceptance or apology or consequences) and Universal Credit (wait 6 weeks for the tech to know your are unemployed), not to mention the completely time consuming "HR" (alias finance inspired) programs that cause more work and headaches than pencil and paper ever did. If these relatively simple systems don't work at scale and have caused untold and un-compensated misery for the least powerful, then we are truly up the electronic creek without a paddle, or a creek!
In my admin role I seem to stumble across odds and ends. My attention was attracted to a Bell bill for a location that did not exist and had been closed for 4 years. Despite having no telephone connection we were still paying for the privilege of several email accounts, long abandoned.
I ensured that Bell no longer serviced that location and ensured that new locations had voip installed with an independent company and transferred as many others as possible. One memorable conversation included the tag line that they were number one in customer service. Without an ounce of self.awareness.
(Not in UK obviously)
I have other stories!
Tesla driver I have observed are very similar to BMW drivers. Road hogging, road weaving and selfish. I can hardly see these folks allowing their status symbols being used by anyone else, including their won family members!
In terms of profitabilty, share price is not directly related to actual profitability. Share are a rich mans lottery and subject to other influences than strictly business and accounting. Operating profits may be somewhat favourable, however that does not take into account previous investment. If Tesla was to close tomorrow, paying off debts, would likely leave a massive loss, although we don't exactly know since as has been pointed out, Tesla is a private company.
Indeed most of the larger tech companies are in a similar position. Wind up Amazon and there would be little left. Its a rich mans world since all these business activities are engines to provide a flow of cash which they owners cream off the top, leaving little behind and contributing even less to the quality of life of their workers.
I tried to do the same for my own name and got this response.
I'm sorry, as an AI language model, I do not have access to personal information or knowledge about specific individuals unless they are public figures or celebrities. Can you provide more context or details about [my name]
Perhaps it is learning about privacy?
The widespread assumption that blockchain is some kind of decentralised wizz tech was always a lie. If the transactions are recorded and linked, then anyone with the authority (i.e. the makers) will have total central control. No matter how many nodes, it is designed to be trackable.
We must un assume the puffery.
i.e. perfect for central control like wot China wants in every area of life. Becuase it is scary running things when people don't fall in to blockchain, I mean, line
At least that is my understanding
So the problem with comparing profits from the previious year is a bit misleading. Number one, they are not losing money. Number two, during Covid I am assuming tech sales were higher than normal. So while it usual to compare year on year, unusual times need to focus on a more meaningful time frame. My cynicism, born of years of hearing this kind of stuff that it is simply an excuse to not properly compensate employees and to have a staff cut to enable the C suite to get extra bonuses.
#Marx#grind#faces#poor
So as some have pointed out the negative ROI. There is also a limit on the future use of this. I am also pretty sure that the Pandora papers etc, if followed up would net a whole lot more. especially since the legowrk has been pre paid.
But then large companies woul d have less to funnel back into certain hands....
"At the moment, 86 percent of NHS trusts have a form of electronic patient record in place. The government wants that figure to reach 90 per cent by the end of next year, he said."
I'm more than 86% certain that those forms are not compatibile, or exportable, or useful. The problem with healthcare is that data is not what cares for people. Data also needs to be integrated into an agreed system of care. NHS (nor any other "system" for that matter) does not have this. Even more so as these are changing times with little leadership and much profit to be made sucking out resources from the financing.
The dream which is modelled on "what will" has no basis, no input from the people actually doing the work.
Pretty much anyone actually providing care will be rolling their eyes wondering just how long this thing will take until the next thing comes along and wastes valuable financial resources that could make a diffrence by actually paying and employing more people.
There is the definition of Sunday as the first day of the week. So actually the common understanding of weekend really week end week stsrt.
Given that every French translation is much longer than the English version, to save the planet from destroying as many forests. Also n the heat generated from thus suggestion could power the world for csnturies!
Now leaving , closing door softly.
With a simple lane assist with my Toyota Corolla, come the snow comes the warning that the camera is not active. It doesn't have to be heavy snow either. Also, with construction (essentially on every trip, local and otherwise, lanes are not often identified.
In fact as an added technology that I thought was promising, it has remained virtually unused. (Two or three times in five years)
My dad used to say that added electrics (by which he meant windows at that point) meant more to go wrong and expensive to repair.
The only really useful "tech" foe me has been seat warmers.