Re: Herding cats with long tails
Surely adopters is a more significant metric than contributors? 1000 people working on a project that hardlay anyone uses isn't an indication of much more than faith, certainly not of success.
6299 publicly visible posts • joined 28 Oct 2011
When you reply to an email, mutt creates a string by appending the recipient addresses to the sendmail variable, then getting the user's shell (probably bash) to interpret the result.
Sounds dangerous. Sanitizing shell input is notoriously difficult and undependable. There are many tricks to sneak escape characters past filters, especially if multibyte characters are permitted, as they now are in email addresses. A value which may seem like a single multibyte character to some code could be seen as a sequence of 2 or 4 simple characters to code that only handles 8-bit. If one of those bytes happens to be significant to a shell, like a ";" or a "\" then all bets are off.
The only safe approach is never to pass remote user input to a local shell, santiized or not.
Personally I think the EU should make phone locking illegal.
You don't have to buy a locked phone. Of course, when you buy an unlocked one it is at full price since the carriers can't rely on the lock to recoup their subsidy. By banning locked phones you'd be asking the EU to make us all pay full price, do you really think that will fly? Most people aren't bothered by a 12-month lock if it gets them a new phone cheap. Leave the choice up to the consumer, not the EU nanny.
Hacker: I look down on him because I do serious crime.
Murderer: I look up to him ↑ because he does serious crime; but I look down on him ↓ because he is just a bit of a lad. I don't do very serious crime.
Bit of a lad: I know my place. I look up to them both. But I don't look up to the murderer as much as I look up to then hacker, because he has got real terrorist potential.
Hacker: I have got real terrorist potential, but I don't kill people. So sometimes I look up to the murderer.
Murderer: I still look up to the hacker because although I kill people, I am vulgar. But I am not as vulgar as the lad so I still look down on him.
Lad: I know my place. I look up to them both; but while I am a penniless thieving wanker, I am industrious and trustworthy. Had I the inclination, I could look down on them. But I don't.
We all know our place, but what do we get out of it?
Hacker: I get life in jail.
Murderer: I get 5 years and a feeling of inferiority from the hacker, but a feeling of superiority over the thieving wankers.
Lad: I get stopped and searched. Every day.
(apologies to Python)
This sort of remote arrangement isn't new, when I was at Queen's University in Belfast at the end of the 70's any "supercomputing" needs were handled by submitting jobs to the CDC 7600 at Daresbury in Cheshire. You could burn up a month's computer allowance in minutes. Today I probably have more computing power on my mobile phone!
Having two elected houses is pointless, I agree, but a second house with powers of examination and question, and suitably-limited control, is a useful failsafe for the "I'll say anything to get re-elected next time" gang in the Commons. Having membership of that second house based on other things, such as merit or heredity, isn't that unreasonable. It gives them reasons to look at laws differently, and so to see different things. So what if they lean towards things which make sure the country will still be a reasonable place for their children to inherit, isn't that pretty much what we all want? It balances out those who want power for their own sake (yes, Mr. Bliar, I'm looking at you). The Lords is in many ways far less a waste of space than many of the 622 seats in the Commons.
doesn't she actually have a point re voting?
No.
If turnout at an election is, say, 50% it indicates that 50% of the potential electorate don't care enough about who wins to actually vote. That's a lot of people who consider their vote to be effectively worthless. There's a clear opportunity there for someone to make it worth something, i.e. "I'll give you £10 to vote for my friend". In some marginal constituencies even 500 votes could make a difference, and at £5k it would be easily affordable to many potential candidates
The downside today is that with a secret ballot, paying for votes is risky. Someone could take your tenner & vote for whoever they want, you have no guarantee that you've got what you paid for,
Online voting completely changes that. You can stand over the person and watch them click the "right" button on your phone, you get a guarantee that you've bought their vote.It's every bit as open to fraud as postal voting.
Manually turning off the engine in a moving car has to be one of the stupidest suggestions in this whole thread.
Firstly because it's pointless, if you're travelling downhill in gear, on a closed throttle, in a modern car there will be no fuel injected anyway, the ECU will see to that.
Secondly, when you're in charge of a ton and a half of steel travelling at several tens of MPH you need to be ready for any unexpected situation, and that means being able to accelerate or steer rapidly as well as brake suddenly. You don't want to be fumbling for clutch pedal and ignition key and trying to restart in an emergency.
Better to maintain the same throttle setting up the hill, and let the car's speed naturally drop from 70 to 65 or 60 rarely even less.
I've driven behind you. Fscking infuriating, either I slow down to keep a safety gap, or I pull out to overtake, just as you decide to accelerate back to 70 on the dowhill. If you can't maintain a constant speed in motorway traffic get a bus pass.
If you're only getting mid 30's to 40MPG you need to look at the way you're driving it.
Oh, I know that :)
It's a 2.2, lots of torque and great fun when you have a heavy right foot, and my consumption figures are pretty consistent with other owners. I could drive it like a nun and get better, I'm sure, but if I'd wanted to do that I'd have bought a Polo BlueMotion.
our current car returns 33-35 MPG in UK which changes to 40-44 MPG in France
Funny, my turbodiesel Mondeo gives me a consistent 36MPG in France, but usually over 40 in the UK. I generally put it down to the lower M-way speedlimits.
As to road comparisons I fear that you are comparing expensive French toll autoroutes with British A-roads. Once your'e off the autoroute and motoring on ordinary routes nationales or departmentales you'll find that they're every bit as crap as UK roads in many places. It's like train comparisons, people compare TGVs to UK commuter trains and claim "French trains are better". Commute on a local TER and you'll have a very different view!
Still, for really bad roads you should try a Californian freeway; potholed concrete-slab bumpity-bumpity-bump hell. I've seen country lanes with better surfaces.
Picard was such an insecure, self-doubting wimp that I never understood how he made it much beyond lieutenant, never mind to starship captain. As to romantic encounters, he's the sort of guy who was probably a virgin on his wedding night, and still turned off the lights before he got undressed.
systemd is awful and one of the worst things that Linux has ever got saddled with in the last 20 years!
Let's face it, every Linux distro team has it's own opinion on how to do system management, and as the saying goes: opinions are like farts, everyone has them but you only like your own. Linux system management is a shambolic, inconsistent mess. Just my opinion, of course...
The bendgate complaints came from people who sat on phones in their hip pocket. Such a phone was probably quite warm, especially if the sitter was on the large side. Have the testers considered whether prolonged warming of the phone, with resultant softening of the glue holding display/battery/etc in place might make them more bendy? Rather like a bar of chocolate, the break/bend point will be very different if the bar has been sat on in your pocket for an hour.
Airlines have been trialling this for a while. I was on a BA flight from Heathrow to SFO on Wednesday, and they announced that they had experimental wifi and phone service on board, active above 10,000 feet. They were upfront that it was experimental, might or might not work well, and would like feedback from anyone who tried it.
They were also quite clear that voice wasn't an option. SMS/MMS/data only, Skype and the like were blocked on the wifi. Any time airlines have surveyed passengers about this, the one clear result is that people don't want to have to listen to "guess where I'm calling you from" for hours on end at 30k feet.
I can't comment on how well it worked. The wifi to the internal login server worked fine, but I wasn't about to pay 6GBP for an hour of trying to surf the web, and I don't seem to belong to any of the partners that T-Mobile work with for roaming.
The most useful bit was the announcement that we didn't need to switch tablets and e-readers off during takeoff and landing.
poke their eyeballs out
Well, the customary practice is called a double-blind test, but I don't think that's what they have in mind. They usually just make sure that the people setting up the test don't know which source is which so they don't give subconscious clues.
Then again, for El Reg, who knows...
What it does do is stop your connections oxidizing.
It's also soft, so sprung connectors make better contact, but it only works if both connectors are gold of a decent thickness. A super-thin layer of gold on one connnctor is pointless, and if the other is a standard nickel-plated one there's even some chance of electrolytic action making the nickel side oxidise faster, if there's moisture around. If you're building stuff to milspec, gold contacts have advantages. For domestic hifi it's just bling, and a way to relieve suckers of their money.
Ah, that brings back memories, of the first time I ever heard a CD. I walked into the lab and was handed a set of headphones (Sennheiser or some such) and told "listen to this". "My name is Luka", the original with just her voice, none of the remixed backing music crap. No tape hiss, no LP crackles. Stunning.
They are neither pre- not post- tax, nor are they gross or net.
For the US I think the more important thing is that the measures are before any welfare aid intended to alleviate the problem, but in Europe that is taken into account first. The US 25% of median could therefore be closer to the European 60% than it may seem.
Counterfeits aren't quite the same, since it's often possible to pass them on to a person or machine that isn't so picky. Of course that raises an interesting moral question, since people who wouldn't dream of knowingly passing on malware often show no reluctance to circulate a dodgy coin. Plausible deniability, maybe? There's probably a psychology PhD thesis in there somewhere...