Re: Errm, surely you mean...
Also, as any fule kno, power = watts * time,
I think most engineering fules would disagree. power = watts = energy * time.
7402 publicly visible posts • joined 28 Oct 2011
« Pour compléter ce dispositif, la révision do Code Frontière Schengen permettra de procéder à des contrôles systématiques aux frontières extérieures pour les ressortissants européens et étrangers. » Again, emphasis in the original.
The French politicians for some unknown reason have always been extremely reticent to move their police away from their borders and in France systematic controls have been occurring ever since Schengen was put in place, always with one excuse or another.
In the original text, doesn't "frontières extérieures" mean the external borders of the EU, not those of France? I would read that as saying that the revision to Schengen allows more extensive controls around "Fortress Europe", not as a desire to increase controls at French borders with the EU. In any case France reintroduced internal border controls with the state of emergency declared after the Charlie Hebdo and Nice attacks.
Yes, we all know everyone checks then logfiles to see if they've made a mistake when otherwise the system seems to be working perfectly.
Any product that isn't secure out of the box when installed is unfit for purpose. If the developer has that cavalier an approach to security in general, what hope is there that the rest of the security "features" have ever been tested?
I suppose this is similar to determining thata vehicle is roadworthy.
More than just similar, it is determining if it's roadworthy.
Something like an MOT would determine if the car is running an acceptably recent version of the SW, if not then it fails and is uninsured.
If there's a critical safety patch, the manufacturer has the responsibility to recall & fix the problem, just as they would if a mechanical probem was found, say with the brakes.
I would suffer far more in the marital relations department if I refused to even look at a problem rather than just fixed it for her, if possible.
But it's when you walk over, do exactly what she was doing, and see it work perfectly that you can seriously dent a relationship...
they may be cheaper to run, but the service satisfaction just drops through the floor.
What's even worse is that the service gets so bad that no-one bothers to call support anymore. The reduced volume of helpdesk calls is then used by manglement as an indicator of how good the outsourced IT services have made everything.
Then something goes titsup and the whole company comes crashing down.
the *wrong disk* had been replaced, losing all data.
Ah yes, the "reverse back up from blank drive to full one" problem. Used to happen with removable disk packs. There's a reason those floor-standing drives had a write-protect switch, but that message didn't always get through.
Just to clarify - it's not actually a European organisation.
It is not funded by the EU at all
I very carefully didn't mention the EU at all, because I am well aware that it isn't an EU organisation. It is, however, a European one (the clue is in the name: European Patent Organisation) and while it may be funded by the patent applications, the Administrative Council that oversees it, and about which I was commenting, is made up of "representatives of the contracting states" who are most assuredly financed by their respective taxpayers.
And you, the tax payer, should educate yourself a little more about what you actually vote to reject.
And you, the Anonymous Coward, should perhaps remove the Brexit chip from your shoulder long enough to actually read the post you reply to.
It's not the first time that some European organization has got into this sort of mess, with a power-hungry type who's hard to be sacked creating a little empire. The need for every government to agree to sack him seems typical of these groups, no-one trusts the others to do the right thing so they insist on full agreement of all 30-odd people before any major decision gets taken. Inevitable result: no major decisions ever get taken (well, except for salary increases & expenses payments, of course). Meanwhile, of course, we (the taxpayers) continue to finance this fiasco.
Come the revolution that wall is going to be very crowded...
the phone company/cable company/cellular company wants a bajillion Pounds to build the infrastructure required to reach your house?
I can understand that you don't want to pay what it would cost to get suitable infrastructure, but do you really expect all the other phone company customers to be happy if they have to pay for your upgrade? Because that's what getting the phone company to pay actually means.
But if Dutch, German, Belgian, French, Italian and Spanish farmers can run globally successful production within the current trade agreements
Can they? The only reason French farmers manage to make a living at all is because they're paid huge subsidies by EU taxpayers. Their farms are far too small to actually be profitable.
The CAP was set up to help such small farmers survive, and it crippled the abilities of big farms like those in the UK. Whatever else Brexit brings, the end of the CAP rules in the UK can only be good for farmers, who will have some incentive to make the UK self-sufficient, instead of being subsidised not to be and forcing us to import food.
It all goes way beyond simple subsidies, of course. The main problem in France is that when a farmer dies the law requires that the estate (which in most cases means the farm) be equally divided among the children. Compare that to UK tradition where the farm is passed down whole to the eldest son/child. Over time that means UK farms can grow, but French ones remain small and fragmented.
Of course, the EU politicians could try to fix that by mandating the same inheritance rules across the EU but they know fine well that it's an impossible task, there's far too much cultural difference for it ever to be acceptable. Note that they'll admit that, of course. Instead they just implement the usual fudge which only works for some people. For the others, well it's their own fault for not being ideal Europeans.
You haven't read the document, have you?
It's pretty clear that the idea is that someone who is normally resident in one Member State, and temporarily travels to another Member State, will still be allowed to stream anything they signed up to at home. That's all.
there is something about a team being more powerful, more impactful, more creative, and frankly hopefully having more fun when they are shoulder to shoulder. Bringing people together creates its own X Factor.
Where 'X' is the unknown?
That statement is complete bollocks, having a distributed team has it's own advantages once you learn to take into account timezone and cultural differences so that you use them instead of fighting them. Remote workers in distributed teams tend to spend less time goofing off around the coffee machine and can be more productive than a team that is all in one place, when properly encouraged and managed.
Most important of all is having a team and Peluso seems determined to destory the teams she has.
Go IBM! (I work for a competitor...)
Managers who discourage being told bad news are very bad managers
True, but technicians who knowingly operate procedures that they know aren't correct just because their manager tells them to are very bad technicians. Whether the fault with the backups was due to technician error, or management orders, it doesn't reflect well on the techs.
the people still put the same councillors back in power that ignored them.
More fool them.
How many of the people who objected to the parking charges stood for council election on a "no charges" platform? Or did they, as usual, assume that it was up to "somebody else"to 'do something" ?
the least-worst can be picked
It's a negotiation, no one gets to "pick" anything, and it would be plain stupid for either the government or the EU to publish details of their final acceptable positions. It would be like going into a poker game saying you expect to play 4 aces, but if pushed you would be OK with a full house.
There's some confusion in the article about line resolutions. Baird's original mechanical system was 30 line, but by the time of the Baird mechanical versus EMI electronic runoff the Baird system was 240 line, and EMI 405. The BBC started in 1936 with the EMI 405-line system, not a "240 line HD" service.
French 819-line broadcasts, arguably a true HD service, started in 1948 but it didn't last and they settled on 625-line like the rest of Europe.
us not to blindly trust calculators or computers (or humans!). Once you've got the answer you should always ask the question: "Does this number look/feel right?"
It's the "GPS problem". If it says turn left, bell-end driver turns left. The fact that there's a No Entry sign, or a dirt track, or a pier end doesn't matter. Schools don't seem to teach common sense any more, and too many parents abdicated that duty a generation ago.
French mobile phone numbers start 06.
112 isn't really hamonized. France has separate 2-digit emergency numbers for each service, 112 just connects to paramedics as a catchall. It won't help if you actually want the police, they'll just tell you to hang up and dial 17.
It's pretty typical EU "standardization", a compromise that sort of works because none of the EU members will actually agree to change anything so that things would really be the same.
I doubt that MLP will get through though, it's far more likley to be Valls, Macron or Fillon.
If there's a second round I agree with you, she stands no chance against Fillon, and little against the other two likely opponents.
It's a potentially big "if", though. French voters have a tendency to use the first round as a protest vote, to send a message, before lining up behind more moderate candidates in the final head-to-head runoff. That bit them in 1995, and could do so again. Le Pen is the only mainstream candidate who is vocally anti-EU (especially anti-euro) and anti-immigration, and it wouldn't surprise me to see her get a big first-round vote from across the country on those issues. People forget that if she should happen to pass the 50% in that first round, there won't be a second round, she'll be elected. With the FN sitting at a consistent 25-26% now, and given people's tendencies to lie about voting for them in polls, passing that 50% in April isn't impossible.
I'm not sure that high levels of trust in the media are necessarily a good thing. In the UK people have very little trust in the press, especially the tabloid press, and even traditionally trustworthy sources like the BBC are now seen as pushing a political agenda (maybe they are, maybe not, but there's a belief that they are). The result is that people are sceptical of what they read.
In France the very paternalistic society means that people trust the state and the media somewhat blindly. If it's in Libération or Le Figaro it's trusted much more than something published in the Guardian or Daily Telegraph in the UK would be, for example.
What that means, though, is that there's less precautionary scepticism in the society. If one of those papers does start pushing a specific agenda it is much more likely to be swallowed without questioning it, at least for a time.