requires JavaScript loaded from a content delivery network, which isn't optimal in terms of security.
I would like to nominate this as "understatement of the week".
7402 publicly visible posts • joined 28 Oct 2011
And yes, if NPM or Nuget falls over, so does our build process. We're also totally dependent on a big cloud service provider for everything. No I don't think this is good, but it's not up to me.
So your build process automatically pulls in unverified and untested code, that anyone could have inserted malware into, and you're OK with that? You are, frankly, a fool.
Oh, and when some personal data escapes and the GDPR guys come around with the €20m fine I think you'll find it is up to you. Your employer will hang you out to dry.
If non-EU companies don't respect GDPR then they are likely to face sanctions which could operate at country level. There would then be a strong incentive for the government of any such country to create local legislation to enforce GDPR rules. Might not be exactly the same penalties, and they might not go to the EU, but the end result would have to be much the same, if trade is to continue. That would be true for both brexited-UK, and other non-EU places like USA, China, Japan, etc.
although copies of the listings can, apparently, be purchased.
You used to get copies of the listing with the systems, on microfiche. I remember many happy days poring through them, since for some never-explained reason our office had a microfiche reader.
What you had to pay for was actual source, on magtape. I vaguely remember that what you got lacked the build environment, but it was many, many microfortnights ago.
Yes, I'm no fan of his electric cars, but Musk certainly showed that he can pull a great engineering team together.
Brings back happy memories of watching Saturn V Apollo launches as a child (also only on TV, fingers crossed I'll get to see a Falcon Heavy launch in person one day) and that twin landing was superb.
Remember, some* of the 52% who voted to leave the EU believed the writing on the big red bus. Don't think for a second they can see through propaganda.
*no hard evidence, but it's certain a percentage did
And you can say exactly the same for some of the 48% who have been told that the world will end come March 2019. There's plenty of propaganda to blame both sides for.
Seeing the so-called "Earth Curvature" proves nothing! Very sophomoric to try to use a rocket, manned or not, to "prove" the Earth is not flat.
Yes, one would think that simply going up would not be useful.
He should really fire that thing horizontally, in a perfect straight line (which should, technically, be easier). At some point he will the fly over the edge of the disc, and can then have the satisfaction of sending back images of the elephants as he sails off into space, knowing he was right. Or something.
Presumably at some point travellers look at more than headline ticket price, and begin to shun the worst airlines
It would be nice to think so, but I doubt it. For a European traveller heading long-haul for 1-2 weeks away the extra cost might not add much to the overall holiday, but for Americans who think of vacation in terms of days, a transatlantic flight for $500 instead of $1000 makes a long weekend in London possible. The choice isn't between "bus service" or "limo", it's between vacation or not.
Does anyone have any figures on how much long-haul economy travel is personal, versus business (company-paid)? In the latter case, as I noted before, we often have little choice. I might be able to justify $100 more to avoid three connections or a 3am start, but they won't pay the 50% surcharge even for premium economy, although I may be willing to pay it myself for a holiday flight,
Some of us who do long-haul for business don't always have the option to spend a bit more & get more comfort, we're constrained by "lowest logical airfare" rules :(
That said, in cattle-class I really don't see much difference between 3+3 single-aisle, and 3-4-3 twin-aisle. Middle seats are still horrible, the rest are much the same. 2-4-2 is good, if you can get into one of the "twos". Upstairs on an A380 is OK for that reason, but then you have the 500-passenger immigration scrum on arrival.
Legroom &seat comfort are the main issues for me. At most I might look for the loo once during a flight, queues there aren't really a problem except for the poor sods in the aisle seats beside them.
VMS has a utility to modify system parameters. Some changes can take effect immediately, some only after a reboot, and it was sometimes irritating to find that someone had modified something in the "active" set but not saved the changes to disk, so on the next reboot whatever problem had been fixed by the change would reappear.
On one occasion I was making such changes. I dutifully saved them to disk first, then to active, to be sure they wouldn't get lost. Unfortunately I'd mixed up my max & min values, setting the max below the min. The moment I saved to active the system stopped dead, didn't even have time to echo the fatal <CR>. Of course, when it rebooted it found the incorrect values on disk & promptly stopped again.
Fortunately VMS has "conversational boot" to allow changes to be made on the fly during boot...
Also remember the convention (just QUB or any 1900 installation?) for distinguishing O from 0 was different to that everywhere else.
IIRC the Electrical Engineering (Ashby) card punch operators used the opposite convention to the computer centre (Botanic), so you had to know who was going to punch your cards to know when to use O and when to use Ø... Thinking about it, it was possibly 1900-related, since the Ashby had a different setup.
point your server's lifecycle controller at it via FTP/SMB. Tell it to update everything and it does, all remotely via the iDRAC.
Been a long time getting to this point but it's sure nice.
Until some miscreant uses this nice simple process to update your firmware and install a backdoor. There are advantages to making invisible software hard to update.
All the comments about the grid not having enough capacity and needing massive enlargement are just plain wrong -- the grid (and the generation behind it) has spare capacity almost all the time except at short power peaks, because if it didn't we'd get blackouts and power cuts all the time.
Don't just guess based on "if", do the calculations.
The UK grid has a generating capacity, flat out, of ~ 96GW so with 8760 hours in a year it could manage 840TWh if everything ran flat-out 24/7. Annual consumption is around 360TWh, so about 41% of that.
The energy consumed by road transport is around 270TWh for cars, and an additional 150TWh for road haulage, so 470TWh in total. That'smore than current electricity use, and the total is almost exactly the absolute maximum grid generation capacity.
There's no way the grid can run at 100% capacity 24/7, not least because demand isn't constant, nor is supply from things like solar and wind. Even without car charging the peak load can reach ~65GW. There is not "massive spare capacity".
You're also ignoring the simple practicalities of charging. A tank of petrol or diesel holds a lot of energy. No matter what the battery technology is, putting that much energy into a battery in an acceptable time requires levels of current/voltage that are impractical in a domestic situation, and dangerous to handle without training (much more so than filing a tank with petrol).
Yes, we need a replacement for fossil-fuelled ICE vehicles, but we need one that is more practical than batteries.
No - a charge for newer versions of my car are the same as ours in terms of time. Improvements in efficiency and battery technology are helping loads - you will, of course, pay more.
Electric cars are already pretty efficient, there isn't room for much more gain. As for the batteries, the problem is still the same. No matter how good the technology, to get more range means more energy put into the battery. Of necessity that means charge at the same rate for longer, or a charge at a higher rate, and a higher charge rate is more load on the grid. There's no free lunch.
This would enable traffic hot-spots to be useful in that they could charge vehicles stuck in the rush hour
I see it now.
"But minister, if we add another lane to the M6 it will enable traffic to flow more freely, and so people will not be able to charge their cars when stuck in the jams. Then when they get home and plug in, the overload will cause blackouts. No, I'm sorry, but we have to reduce the number of lanes in order to keep the lights on."
All of the pro-EV ideas here only make sense while EVs are a tiny minority. None of them scale to full use, due to tax or practical infrastructure issues.
Our EV works out cheaper by far than the car it replaced.
I'll bet you got a subsidy, and the "fuel" is charged at domestic 5% VAT, not road fuel VAT+duty of 61%. Remove the subsidy and price your electricty at the same per km as petrol or diesel, as must happen long term, and the cost wil be the same.
There are suppliers of electricity that are committed to only using greener methods, such as ecotricity in the UK
But they can't produce the same amount of power as the 'classic' methods. If all cars were EVs the UK would need to double it's annual electricity production to charge them. Can't be done with today's green technology.
Ranges, whilst still not up to scratch, are increasing each year
Double the range means double the energy stored in the battery. Inevitably that means double the charge time, or double the charge rate. The former is likely to be even less acceptable, the latter means doubling grid capacity and is potentially infeasible for domestic chargers on safety grounds.
in the lifetime of many readers the only car you can buy will be something that doesn't burn fosil fuel.
Entirely possible, but rechargeable battery-electric won't get us there.
Pay less if charging in the wee hours overnight?
Only works if that's a significantly lower demand. Replace all ICE cars by electric and the charging demand over a year will be around 270TWh, about 2/3 that of normal grid use (domestic + business). Night time car-charging demand won't be off-peak anymore, it will be the same as daytime peak. So no discount.
the cost of my motoring so far this month has been £42.60 and I've done more than 1000miles.
Yes, but 61% of road fuel price is tax + duty. No government is going to give up on that, whether you get your power from the grid or home PV. Electric cars are only significatly cheaper to "fuel" because they aren't a big enough market yet.
Speculative execution means that the CPU will decide to take a given branch because the branch predictor has guessed that this branch will be taken. This speculative branch is taken while other instructions are in-flight.
Yes, that I understand.
My confusion was that I was assuming that "conditional branch" meant something like a single "branch if xxx" instruction, whereas "unconditional branch" would be "branch always". I wasn't allowing for them to be separated, where a preceding test would later be followed by a branch always, the combination being the "conditional branch" which could be speculatively executed. Thanks.
How long before we break orbit and can go exploring the cosmos from the comfort* of our own planet?
Or city? Maybe it's time to re-read my old copy of Cities in Flight...