a service maintained, patched and hardened by the Windows giant
And its security reputation speaks for itself...
7402 publicly visible posts • joined 28 Oct 2011
how the NIST and NSA made DUAL_EC_DRBG with weak P and Q a requirement for FIPS certification
It was one of 4 algorithms approved for FIPS 140 certification, and NIST removed it from SP 800-90A about 5 years ago when when its strength was questioned.
In this case, though, the issue isn't with FIPS algorithms but with the implementation of the POST code. The test lab that did the certification should probably have picked up on that.
In Canada and VietNam they used pneumatic torpedoes that happily imitate moles (or groundhogs, shrews, gerbils or ferrets) and burrow a tunnel bypassing existing cables, pipes and conduits.
Ah, who else remembers Lesley Judd on Blue Peter holding one of those cable-laying mole devices, throbbing like a giant dildo (which clearly hadn't escaped her attention, she was having a hard time keeping her face straight, it was a kid's show). Must have been late 70s?
Pity the British cable layers don't use current technology.
Current? BT was using it 40 years ago.
That type of stuff you find only in the kingdoms of the world
France is a republic, but has a well-developed honours system. The lowest rank in the Légion d'honneur is "Chevalier", which is "knight".
am I wrong to assume they actually have to pay a bit for the privilege?.
Yes.
Some people do get recognised because they've spent lots of their money on stuff, like Bill Gates and his Foundation, but other honours go to people like librarians and dinner ladies for their service to their communities.
when the honors system is changed so that an honorary honor can be bestowed, it call into question the basic reasoning behind the whole thing.
Why so? It's a recognition that the person honoured has done something worthwhile for the country or its people, whatever that person's nationality. The "honorary honour" is just a way of allowing that to happen for non-commonwealth citizens. It has restrictions, like the inability to use a title, but the recognition is just as valid and as valuable.
where a bunch of pompous, self-important and essentially self-apppointed people deem themselves (and those they decide to bestow honors on) to be of more value as human beings than all the other human beings?
Most honour awards start by recommendations from ordinary people who work with the person concerned. They write to an awards committee to propose that someone be recognised. Obviously there needs to be some sort of selection process, and the people on those committees are usually senior people from the committee's fields of expertise, like health, arts, education, business.
Might also begin to explain why food banks and other signs of poverty are so common in UK
France and Germany have 3-5x as many people using food banks as the UK.
and the NHS is struggling, even while it is deemed appropriate to spend vast amounts of cash on aircraft carriers and aircraft to go on those aircraft carriers
By their very nature health services will always struggle, no matter how much money is given to them they can always spend more. The UK is no worse than other European countries in that matter. As for aircraft carriers, it's a pity that we need them, but defence is fundamentally no different to healthcare, it's a necessary part of any government spending in a free country.
Where the remain vote beat the leave vote?
Hmm. Take the 35% of people who voted for "hard Brexit" parties, compare it with the 40% who voted for any sort of Remain party, and by ignoring the other 25% it concludes that remain votes exceeded leave ones? Interesting approach, but I feel it lacks a certain mathematical rigour.
Ever since the election journalists from all the papers have been trying to map the figures to align with their preferred leave/remain outcome, and they've all succeeded! If nothing else that just shows that the figures are still much as they were three years ago, with no major shift either way.
It also perhaps shows that the Leave voters have a more concrete idea of what they want, since the single-issue hard Leave party (Brexit) got 31% of the votes and 40% of the seats, while the single-issue Remain party (ChangeUK) got 3.3% of the votes, and no seats.
We had students like Charlie. The ones who phoned the computer centre and owned up were thanked, told not to do it again, and the underlying bug was fixed. The ones who ran away leaving someone else to clean up the mess were hunted down and had a very painful interview with the CC director. They also usually got a ban for some weeks or months.
and this differs from external borders, how?
It's the "weakest link" problem, it requires all Schengen members to trust the border controls for all externally-facing members. Needless to say, they don't, but dislike saying so quite so bluntly. Instead they come up with various reasons why they, exceptionally, have to maintain their own checks.
Years ago I was at a meeting in a BT building in central London. All entry was via card-operated turnstiles minded by security staff, barely enough room to squeeze through with a briefcase. Visitors were signed-in to get temporary cards.
Fire alarm went off (somebody burnt the toast in the kitchen, yes really) and we all evacuated into the street. When the alarm was over 15 minutes later we all re-entered via the firedoors helpfully held open for us. No checks, we could have been accompanied by any passer-by who joined the crowd, carrying anything.
over the period 2014-2016 UK researchers and Innovators received 15.2% of the Horizon 2020 funding, for a total of just under €3.8bn funding.
That's nice, €1.3bn/year. Over the same 3-year period we send around £13bn gross (after the rebate) to the EU each year, of course (Germany sends €20bn/year). They're paying us with our own money, and making it seem like we're getting something, which is pretty smart.
The newer models also steer back into the correct lane if they detect that you're steering out - I tried something similair in a different hire car and it worked very nicely, gently decisive without being too sudden or intrusive.
I've driven a car with that. It was intensely annoying, especially on twisty country lanes where it's often impossible to keep a large car fully within the lane all the time without scraping along the hedge.
I think that's it's these sort of driver-assist technologies that are the best life-savers right now. Driver still has full attention, car helps out to improve/focus that attention.
On the contrary, if you're drifting out of a lane to the point where a gadget has to tell you about it then you very clearly are not paying full attention.
keep your effing hands on the effing wheel and pay attention to the bloody road
Applies to all drivers, not just Tesla, and the best way to ensure it is to stop fllling cars with stupid gadgets that encourage drivers to pay less attention. When you're the driver you should be driving, with 100% of your attention on that single task. In which case there is zero need for "driver aids".
At what point do developed nations stop the bleeding of jobs?
At the point where their citizens agree to pay 3x the price for stuff made "at home", or when the staff in those home industries agree to a 60% salary cut to compete with the developing economies.
a nostalgic reverence for the past. I don't think their is any country in the world which seems to hold such a love of steam trains
As someone who enjoys watching steam trains, I don't think its a nostalgia issue, but an engineering one. I do remember travelling on steam-hauled passenger trains, even as a small boy I could see that they were noisy and dirty.
The thing about a modern high speed locomotive like a TGV is that it's impressive but boring, all the "works"are hidden inside & just hum away to themselves. A steam loco is 'real' engineering, you can see all the bits working together. I'd sooner watch a new steam loco like Tornado than a TGV, not because it's an old design but because there's something to see. I'm an engineer, I like watching the mechanical bits :)
Woah: "mountain spine" feels like an exaduration (unless you are Dutch!)... The highest point in England is Scafell Pike (978 metres : 3208 ft.).
The Pennines are still tricky for trains, which struggle with more than a 4% grade, Have you seen how hard something like Tornado has to work to climb Shap Fell on the west coast mainline? Even a modern electric HST has relatively low limits compared to road vehicles.
Surely there are multiple examples of similar hilly terrain that fast trains already go through (Japanese? Chinese?)
3.85% grade for the Japanese bullet train, according to wikipedia. The Paris-Lyon TGV track reaches 3.5%. Long sweeping curves can make it easier, but then you're back with the problem of finding and buying lots of land. Going through is possible, of course, the Swiss are experienced there, but it's far from cheap even for short tunnels.
Poorly designed tracks, without the experience of 100 years of engineering means that the trains have to travel slowly because corners.
They were OK for the trains at the time. Today's problem is that Britain is a long, thin, country that is very densely populated in just the places where high-speed trains would be useful, and with a central mountain spine in the way. That makes it difficult, politically and financially, to buy the land to straighten out the tracks.
France, for example, is the opposite. twice the area of the UK, with a big empty space in the middle where the tracks needed to be laid.
Eurostar is a prime example of the different situations. The area between Paris and Calais is old coal-mining land, with high unemployment and low incomes. People there were trying to force the train to go past their towns, to bring jobs in. Across the channel you hit Kent, the "Garden of England", land of orchards, mansions and Mercedes. Those folks were spending their money to keep the nasty, noisy train away.
Absolutely pathetic tilting ..... apparently
Lots of money down the shitter. Obviously the people pioneering HS2 have very short memories
You've got most of that completely backwards.
The titl worked extremely well, so well that people were slightly seasick because they felt no cornering force when their eyes told them the train was tilting. They had to reduce the tilt to make the cornering felt.
APT failed because of politics in nationalised British Rail, with conservative teams claiming it was too advanced and couldn't be done, even though it was actually working. When politics finally killed it the patents were sold to the Italians, who used them in the Pendolino trains that we eventually bought. Buying our own technology back due to political stupidity.
As for HS2, its a victim of exactly the same politically-motivated backstabbing.
N. Ireland has dozens, from the fairly posh Co. Down one from out Hillsborough way to the harsh E. Belfast inner-city variety. Not to mention the Ballymena one made famous by a certain late politico, or the incomprehensible Strabane one.
Then again I knew someone with an inner-city Belfast accent which really grated on me, yet her Canadian husband loved her "gorgeous Irish accent". No way could you place a generic Norn Iron accent in a general list of favourites.
The current lot have turned their back on Thatcher's proudest achievement, the Single Market.
I think she'd have been very happy if it had stayed as a free single market.
The current centrally-controlled and regulated protectionist apology for a "market" would not have been to her taste.
computers only sold to dealers to get the car electronics to accept these new parts.
You can buy adequate substute computers on eBay, or find a moonlighting mechanic to make the change for you. Like DRM, it just makes life difficult for the honest person but has zero effect on the criminals.
You can only stand if you have the money to be able to.
If you think you have a platform that people will support, raising a few thousand from potential voters shouldn't be difficult. If you can't raise it, you're clearly running on a platform people aren't interested in.
Sure, you can pay it all yourself if you're just running for your own amusement or vanity, but that's not what elections are there to encourage.
As Brexit has proved, in this country, we are fucking stupid.
Defining someone as stupid simply because they disagree with your view? Not the most logical of arguments
We have a reading age of less than nine according to OECD https://www.oecd.org/skills/piaac/Country%20note%20-%20United%20Kingdom.pdf
I'm curious how you get "reading age of less than nine" from that PDF. It seems to show that the UK is pretty much in the middle when it comes to literacy & numeracy in the EU, better than some like France, and non-EU places like the US, but worse than S. Korea or the Scandinavians, which won't come as a surprise to anyone. Disappointing to see the poor numeracy levels in may places, but it seems unfashionable these days to teach mental arithmetic in schools "why bother, everyone has a calculator" is the prevailing attitude.
Our education system literally is going backwards https://literacytrust.org.uk/information/what-is-literacy/
Yes, Tony Blair's policies have a lot to answer for. Not that his kids will suffer, of course, since he sent them to a private school.
I wouldn't bet on it:
Drug dealer arrested after calling police to report stolen cocaine
after all, if they were smarter they might not have to turn to crime...
Have you ever seen that used in real life?
Nope.
A quick Google search suggests its only supported out of the box between Windows OS's which must make it close to non-existent given how common managing Windows boxen with telnet is.
My current Debian Linux box supports it, at least according to the telnet manpage.
Agreed, though, it's unlikely to be in widespread use, especially since it uses preshared keys rather than any public key approach.