Re: Odd
Well, she obviously dealt with the problem...
7408 publicly visible posts • joined 28 Oct 2011
It does highlight one of the ongoing issues with Open Source. The GNU project predates the explosion of software due to the widespread internet and WWW, and I don't think it really foresaw a world where software would be used by, and written by, everone and his dog on a daily basis. Nowadays we frequently see the situation where someone knocks up a bit of code for themselves, but thinking it might be useful to a few others they unthinkingly slap a GPL header on it and put it up somewhere like github. A few years later they realise that it's really popular, lots of businesses have picked it up, and they're expected to keep maintaining it for nothing. It's unsurprising, really, that many of them regret having made it so freely available and wish they'd kept enough control to have commercialized it themselves.
That doesn't bother the people who are ideologically convinced that commercial software is an abomination, but the real world isn't so black and white. I wouldn't be surprised to see a move back towards the 'shareware' model of the 70's and 80's, where people made their software available for free for hobby and non-commercial use, but very clearly stated that anyone wanting to use it commercially (including for AI training) should call to discuss licence terms.
I also wonder how the use of AI like this will impact software patents. The whole concept of a patent is that the developer of the design gets an exclusive license to commercialise the design for a fixed period, in return for which they make the design public so that others can understand it, and improve on it. That sounds like a perfect definition of what AI does, it can be trained on published patent info and then instructed to create a non-infringing duplicate. Might make people much less likely to patent software in the future.
not from the 9.7m they had, which was a push to get rid of the Tories.
Labour had 10.3m votes in 2019, and dropped to 9.7m in 2024. They didn't get any significant number of anti-Tory votes in 2024. The reasons the Tories got stuffed was their drop from 14m to 6.8m votes. Those 7m missing votes didn't go to Labour, some went to Reform and some were the 3m fewer people who voted at all.
I never could get a coherent explanation of why or where got the cable from
75ohm cable with BNC connectors could also be from video camera/monitors, so perhaps collected when left "unwanted" in a conference room?
Unfortunately the centre pins on 50 and 75 ohm BNCs are different diameters, so tend to either make poor connections or stretch the female socket centre connectors when plugs & sockets are mismatched.
Political Correctness is about ensuring your language doesn’t cause offence without first checking to see if it does cause a problem.
It's worse than that, it's more about assuming that it is causing a problem based on one's own views, without being able to accept that the view of the people concerned should be taken into account. When those involved say "you're over-reacting, we aren't offended", the PC response is "no we're not, you should be offended and if you're too blind/thick/naive to see it then you're part of the problem". It's an arrogant, self-righteous, reaction.
Wokeness is about being aware of and responsive to what is actually causing a problem.
It started that way, and would indeed be a good thing if it had remained so. Unfortunately the problems concerned often affected minorities, and some more militant members of those minorities weaponised it to the point where it became seen as PC++. It's perfectly reasonable to say something like "we need to accept that this small group sees things differently, and we should consider that", but very different to say "our small group disagrees, and if you don't do what we want you're a nasty, discriminating fascist". Taking minority views into consideration, and finding a working compromise, is good (and arguably what "woke" was about). Expecting minority views to prevail over majority ones because minorities are more important is neither good nor useful.
when the far right accuses the liberal left of these things they are implicitly recognising that they’re on the wrong side of history.
"left" and "right"are not useful terms in such a statement. You could equally accurately say "when the far left accuses the liberal right of these things they are implicitly recognising that they’re on the wrong side of history."
With thanks to Mark Eckman and Jerrold Zar:
I have a spelling checker,
It came with my PC.
It plane lee marks four my revue
Miss steaks aye can knot sea.
Eye ran this poem threw it,
Your sure reel glad two no.
Its vary polished in it's weigh.
My checker tolled me sew.
A checker is a bless sing,
It freeze yew lodes of thyme.
It helps me right awl stiles two reed,
And aides me when eye rime.
Each frays come posed up on my screen
Eye trussed too bee a joule.
The checker pours o'er every word
To cheque sum spelling rule.
Bee fore a veiling checker's
Hour spelling mite decline,
And if we're lacks oar have a laps,
We wood bee maid too wine.
Butt now bee cause my spelling
Is checked with such grate flare,
Their are know fault's with in my cite,
Of nun eye am a wear.
Now spelling does knot phase me,
It does knot bring a tier.
My pay purrs awl due glad den
With wrapped word's fare as hear.
To rite with care is quite a feet
Of witch won should bee proud,
And wee mussed dew the best wee can,
Sew flaw's are knot aloud.
Sow ewe can sea why aye dew prays
Such soft wear four pea seas,
And why eye brake in two averse
Buy righting want too pleas.
I've heard the same approach suggested for physical security. Leave a door key under the plant pot on your front porch, but make sure it doesn't open your lock. By the time the burglar has discovered that, they'll be getting antsy about neighbours and doorbell cameras and will probably give up and go elsewhere.
I have multiple 100+ year-old books which still function perfectly-well.
Assuming they're written in a language that's still understood, or that you have a convenient Rosetta Stone, that is.
got his "mate who can sign the certificate" in on the last day.
That's quite permissable under building regs if the mate properly checks the work before issuing the certificate. Many (most?) electricians prefer not to do it because they'd rather get paid to do the whole job than only get a small fee for final certification, but they may be willing to do it for a mate.
“If they can afford X, they can afford Y” is pure fantasy maths.
It's an oversimplification. If they can't afford both X and Y they aren't in a position to run a business. IT security should be up there with health and safety, a mandatory function without which a business should not be permitted to operate.
This is the problem. People have stopped voting for someone they want, and just vote against the party they don't want. They vote for Reform (especially in by-elections) not because they want to see Farage in No. 10, it's that they have almost given up caring because they see that all parties do the same thing, and are useless at it. They have a faint hope that an electoral kicking will make them listen, although there's certainly no sign that it had any effect on the Tories or Labour.
Just how naive are these people?
I've lost count of the number of times I've pointed out security issues when misusing someone's code, only to get the responses "but why would anyone do that?" or "that's not very likely to happen in real life, is it?" Most people, even supposedly senior developers, just don't get it.
Back in the 80s I remember using Newbury Labs terminals to talk to a Z80-based RML380z. When we opened the terminal we found that it used a Z80 internally for the display, and had another in the keyboard. Two Z80s just to interface to the one which did all the work.
If only there were a UK TV licence that included all streaming services as part of it!! I'll wake up from this dream some day.
Just taking the basic ad-supported tiers of the main streaming services, that works out around £430 per year for them all, plus the £180 for BBC. Are you sure you want to pay > £600 for that?
Main exchanges had lead-acid batteries that could last for many hours, and a generator to take over when required. With the move to digital exchanges and outlying concentrators the battery life was much less, but in general long enough to take a generator on-site and connect it.
The problem with fibre setups is that powered street cabinets are everywhere. BT ones rarely have more than an hour or two battery life, others (like Virgin) have no battery backup at all. Since the mobile network often uses the same fibres for backhaul, once the outlying node batteries die nothing works. Only PSTN lines on main exchanges still operate.
PSTN analog network is obsolete, becoming harder to maintain and significantly more expensive to run,
How much of that extra expense is because the old PSTN was held to considerably higher standards of availability than the replacement IP network? If broadband had to meet the same standard it wouldn't necessarily be cheaper. See this article for example.