it'll not get better
When everyone has to charge electric cars as well.
7408 publicly visible posts • joined 28 Oct 2011
denied the steel contacts in the JT blocks were at fault, telling the court: "A break in a contact as described would cause a continuous fault, being a physical or electrical break in connection. Neither would (without external factors for which the Defendant is not responsible) cause intermittent (i.e. irregular or non-continuous) faults."
Bare steel will rust, and I've have thought that copper wires pushed straight into IDC slots on rusting steel would certainly lead to intermittent contacts, and even "rusty-bolt" diode effects that would play havoc with ADSL.
The real kicker of problematic is people at a company dictating a specific system and or sub-system.
In my experience this is the biggest driver of shadow IT. To take a recent example, our corporate IT group decided to replace the in-house wiki & document-sharing platform that we had been using for years with a different, more modern one. The argument was that it was newer and more supportable. This was simply imposed on the company without consultation (beyond the C-suite).
For many of the basic sales/marketing users who used it to upload plain info, HowTos, etc. it was just the usual pain of learning a new system. No big deal - "they'll get over it". The development organization, however, was a big user of in-house tools, specific to our products and processes, and they produced HTML output. The new wiki system would not render HTML without new plugins which were not part of the deployment, and were clunky & unfriendly to use in any case.
After a few months of trying to adapt, various parts of the development org opted for the obvious solutions, they started to re-purpose lab systems as standalone web servers. They served the HTML and the wiki system just became a front-end to them.
Is this maintainable? Sort-of. In most cases the systems were stood up by the team that needed them, so when someone leaves they rot until someone else figures out how they work, which depends on how well the initial developer of the system documented it. Does it get patched in time? Sometimes, when people remember. Does it respect the in-house security rules? Best-effort, but obviously IT don't audit it. Does it allow the development teams to get on with their core work, and make money for the company? Absolutely.
That's what causes shadow IT.
poster child for stupid.
Stupid or not, there's still no excuse for someone who happens to find those photos then sharing them. That's what Apple has paid up for. If the repair tech had simply admired the images and fixed the phone there wouldn't have been a problem.
Using ordinary drives in a RAID enclosure can also do that, at least for READ operations. The controller parallelizes read requests, distributing them around the disks, and using whichever disk has the heads in the best place for a particular request, that's been around since the 1980s at least. Looks like the Seagate solution is just to put this in one drive box & call it a single disk.
If Company G generates revenue in country X
If it generates profit in country X, it should pay tax in country X. Paying tax on revenue does not make sense, it's a bodge to get around the fact that tax codes are stupidly complex. The fix is to simplify them, not to add yet more bodges on top of bodges. That just creates even more loopholes for tax lawyers to exploit.
that never happened during her operational life.
The problem was that being a 1950's design, Britannia's engines burned heavy bunker oil. Since recent Navy ships all burn light diesel they couldn't send Britannia anywhere (to the Falklands, for example) because they would have had to send a special fuel tanker to accompany her. Not only uneconomic, but impractical since it just created a two-birds-with-one-torpedo target.
As if there was no physical evidence of bypass and they had to ask Western Power for their opinion
An average cop is not an electrical engineer, and not qualified to decide if a meter has been bypassed. An expert could easily bypass a meter while making it look connected. So yes, they asked the experts at the power company for their opinion, of course.
Dirty servers + clean shelves suggests its just been moved,
...
so I'm expecting to confirm evidence of the ventilation since 2016
Basic contradiction there. Just because equipment is dated in 2016 doesn't mean it was installed at its present site in 2016.
Some of the best Camembert (and Brie) I've ever had was made right here in Sonoma County, California.
Funny, I'm just reading an old James Bond novel (Live and Let Die). Apart from the stereotypical (for the time) descriptions of black people that would give the PC crowd conniptions, it contains a scene with Bond and Solitaire having dinner, where he orders "some of the domestic Camembert that is one of the most welcome surprises on American menus", and that was in the 1950s.
a mighty 67MB of storage
RM05s were 256MB formatted, in a washing-mchine sized cabinet. I remember, because I had to back one up every Monday morning. Direct disk-to-disk using two drives, and careful checking that you'd pushed the write-protect on the source before launching the copy...
They were also somewhat temperature sensitive, and sometimes after a cold weekend they would fail their self-tests until they warmed up.
You. Do. Not. Fuck. Around. With. Critical. Infrastructure.
But ill-intentioned people do, all the time. If it's that crititical it's up to the maintainers to make sure that You. Cannot. Fuck. With. It.
You wouldn't expect a bank to allow random strangers to submit financial transactions, even if you could revert them if/when they were detected, so why should the OS that the bank systems are running on be treated any differently?
They don't even have to leave the country any more, just move their money to somewhere anonymous.
If they do that legally they will still be taxed on it, since tax is paid where you're fiscally resident (or where you are domiciled, if you manage not to be resident anywhere).
Obviously hiding the money in an offshore tax haven will mean you can avoid the tax on it, but that's illegal & changing the tax percentages won't fix that, only jail time will.
The UK start taxing your earning at 40% above £37K
Not quite. It's 0% up to £12.5K, 20% up to £50K, and 40% over that (until the £150K point). The £37K is £37K *above* the non-tax threshold, not the actual threshold.
If your earning over 500K per year. it should be 50% tax, 1m per year, 60% tax, 2m+ 70%
Historically that doesn't work, people just leave the country and move to a tax haven, like pop stars did in the 60's when Labour governments tried the 'soak the rich" taxes.
But the majority of those earning 2m+ a year are sports stars, actors and CEOs of multi nationals.
Exactly the kind of people who can, and will, leave the country to avoid the problem.
The more you earn, the more tax you pay.That's how percentages work anyway. Punishing people for earning more is counter-productive.
What do you have against dividends? If they borrowed from a bank they'd pay interest, instead they borrow from shareholders, and pay dividends (or not, as in 2020). Would you rather they paid money to fat cat bankers?
Looks like the government is offering a big tax break to help with fibre rollout, and BT is taking that money and using it to fund a 30% increase in rollout rate. Would you prefer that they not take the money and keep to the slower rollout?
The problem isn't so much the HR bar, it's the fact that this sort of screw-up is considered so unimportant that the people who do it get a "oops, please don't do it again" as their only punishment.
At the very least it should be called out in their anual review, with an "unsatisfactory" rating & the consequential salary/bonus/promotion hit that would go with it. They should also be sent on compulsory IT security training (and they should all have had some basic training anyway).
Companies need to be made to realise that this is just as important as H&S training, and that such carelessness can have equally serious effects on other people's lives.
first Cat-5 cabling that went in at a former employer (we'd previously used thinwire Ethernet
Ah yes, we had a thinwire (10base2, over 50Ω coax) network around the office. Worked fine most of the time, but under heavy load the throughput it would occasionally drop through the floor with huge collision counts. It took weeks before I eventually found the piece of left-over 93Ω ARCNET cable, buried in an underfloor duct, that someone had used for one small segment...
company decided not to press charges
Which I think is the problem with all the stories posted here. The company just wanted the thefts to stop, so kicked the suppliers out. They, in turn, just fired the offending staff, who almost certainly hired on elsewhere and repeated the thievery. No-one got punished, so they all just treated it as being normal behaviour. No wonder it still happens.
Of course they're discriminatory, that's the whole idea. They discriminate against people who won't take steps to protect the people they come in contact with.
I can certainly see logistical difficulties in using them for access to bars & restaurants, I'm not sure that would ever fly, but for things like air or sea travel the process is not much different to that for electronic visa-type things like ESTAs, ETIAS, etc. Tie them to the travel document (passport, ID card). Same for jobs where people come in contact with the general public. We wouldn't let someone drive a bus unless they could prove they have a license to do so safely, proving that they don't present a health risk to their passengers is no different.
I worked in an office in central Belfast in the 80s, mostly fairly young staff with a good educational background. The political/religious makeup of the office was pretty close to that of the province as a whole. We tended to avoid local political subjects in large groups at coffee break time because they were sensitive (and there were two guys that we just knew would get steamed up) but we frequently discussed wider political, and religious subjects. The conversations were usually tolerant and light-hearted, and most people know when to draw a line and change the subject. I like to think we all learned something about other cultures & backgrounds, and it never stopped us all heading for a beer together on a Friday after work.
People should, instead, have these conversations with co-workers using private channels, whether that’s over other messaging apps like Signal and WhatsApp, or through a personal Basecamp account.
Or perhaps in person, over a beer or a coffee? My Czech colleagues are always happy to chat about the political issues of the day, but only in person, never by mail or slack. We're adult enough to avoid aggressive posturing, and I certainly think we all learn a lot even if we disagree on solutions. I find it amusing (and a little sad) that most of my US colleagues, on the other hand, flatly refuse to discuss politics, even at the generic "can you explain about..." level, and religion/culture is only discussed reluctantly. There was one exception, someone that I knew was involved outside work with the Democrat campaign when Obama was running. I knew him well enough to ask (over dinner outside the office) if he thought the USA was ready for a black president, we had a most interesting discussion. He was genuinely pleased that a European would take an interest.
I agree that using work social media apps for it isn't a good idea, it's far too easy for that sort of basic text-only discussion to lead to misunderstandings. The posts also tend to hang around long after the fine nuances of the issue are lost.
As I read the article, the uninstall used the compromised malware framework, so would only happen on systems that were already infected. If you've kept your PC protected & malware-free nothing would happen. This isn't a case of the white hats using an exploit to break into your system for some arguably-beneficial purpose, they are modifying malware you've already 'caught' to uninstall itself. I think that's less of a concern.