Re: magnum opera
Well, you know that saying about the fat lady singing...
7402 publicly visible posts • joined 28 Oct 2011
Untrue.
When you digitise, you lose information, based upon the sample rate.
Note that I said "no discernable loss". Certainly you lose information at frequencies above half the sample rate, but if that's beyond the range of human hearing you can't hear it, so it doesn't matter. Analogue recording, vinyl or tape, follows the same principle.
It "sounds better" for much the same reason that gold-plated oxygen-free copper cables "sound better". The owner has paid a lot of money for it, and has to justify it.
With good A-D and D-A convertors there is no discernable loss or change from using digital techniques, that can be proven mathematically. It may well be that people prefer an analogue reproduction, because they like the way it changes the sound, but it isn't objectively "better" than a digital recording. That's not unlike the way that a studio recording can sound "better" than a live experience, because it's been tweaked to sound better.
this is just going to create massive upward pressure on used ICE vehicles.
I expect it to create a whole new industry for refurbishing used ICE vehicles to bring them back to as-new status, while still being considered "used" and therefore sellable. There's very little in a modern car which can't be refurbished and restored, since bodywork doesn't rust away as quickly as it did in the 70s and 80s.
By default, Thunderbird has keyboard accelerators enabled, there's a raft of easy-to-hit-accidentally keystrokes that will send, file, or otherwise disrupt your mail. First thing I do on any install is to disable them, which solves most such problems.
Probably a huge part of modern productivity and living standards arises from standard interchangable common parts.
True, but that's mostly been driven by industry-related standards bodies which understand the technical issues. Mandating such things by government fiat, through bureaucrats who have little or no technical knowledge, rarely works.
I don't think so.
You would be wrong not to do so. From https://european-union.europa.eu/principles-countries-history/languages_en
English remains an official EU language, despite the United Kingdom having left the EU. It remains an official and working language of the EU institutions as long as it is listed as such in Regulation No 1. English is also one of Ireland’s and Malta’s official languages.
a language can't be separated from the culture to which it belongs
Very true. It's interesting to compare French and Canadian French, for example. The Candian variety tends to use more active constructions (like English), French French is often more passive.
In a similar vein, the farewell recording on the Eurotunnel trains says "We hope you had a pleasant journey" in English, but in French it's "We hope your journey was pleasant". A small difference, but glaringly "unconventional" to a native speaker if you get the wrong one.
then the earth is not powered up in any form
If they had mistaken it for an earth, and connected it to some equipment that had RC filters on the mains input, it's not impossible that the cable could be left floating at half-mains voltage through the filter chokes. An earth is only going to be at ground potential if it's actually earthed.
I've seen this, a friend in a very rural home commented to me that the washing machine in an outbuilding gave her a shock when she touched it. A quick meter test showed that the case was indeed half-live, and when the local electricity board came out they found that the main earth spike for the house wasn't connected (corroded through), so nothing was actually earthed...
Not just sparkies. Many years ago a plumber was working in a shopping centre near us. He set his blowtorch down carelessly, and set fire to a case of tea. To try & put it out he went looking for a fire extinguisher, by the time he returned the warehouse was on fire, and when the fire brigade arrived they couldn't save the rest of the centre. There was some news footage of a car dealer being interviewed in front of the main doors about the new cars on display in the main mall and, just as the interviewer asked if he thought the cars could be retrieved safely, the roof of the centre fell in. The dealer just grimaced and said something like "I don't think so".
Something like 17 million quid damage, and the plumber's liability insurance topped out at 1m... They never rebuilt.
You whined that the EU was blocking goods shipments despite the UK continuing to follow the same standards.
No, I said that the EU was over-zealous in checking compared to how it treats other 3rd countries, even though there was no reason to do so since we hadn't changed the standards that we followed. No-one is asking for special treatment, just fair treatment with other non-members.
They *always* made clear the UK was never going to be granted all the benefits of being a member of the single market and/or the EU, if it chose to be outside of them. What sense of entitlement makes you think this is unreasonable?
I do wish you'd actually make some attempt to read and understand what I wrote, before leaping in with knee-jerk reactions based on what you assume I wrote. Of course we don't have all the benefits of being a member of the single market, we left it, ye eejit!
UK/EU trade is governed by the agreement that both sides signed. I am merely stating the fact that the EU applies much more zealous checks to this small border than it does anywhere else, for no good reason. Perhaps we could do the same, create a special "EU passports" lane at Heathrow, with one border control officer that spends 10 minutes checking each and every passport, and then a customs officer that opens every suitcase. Think the EU response would be "It's OK, they left the club, they're entitled to check our things very thoroughly"? Somehow, I doubt it. No one has any special sense of entitlement, just an expectation that both sides will show a sense of pragmatic fair play so both sides can benefit.
Horrible EU, "bullying" poor little Britain, whose only crimes were to assume that it could have its cake and eat it, to assume that *they* would be the ones pushing the EU around and to blame the EU when it wasn't given everything its deluded sense of entitlement led it to expect.
The sad thing is that without this ludicrous sense of "Oh shit, if we don't make life difficult for the Brits, someone else might leave!" both the EU and the UK would gain. I believe the phrase is "cutting off one's nose to spite one's face".
And Johnson's hollow, puffed-up bullshit doesn't work nearly as well when the intended target isn't the English nationalist audience his sub-John-Bull schtick was designed for.
With that sort of anti-Tory, xenophobic attitude it would seem likely that your mind is too closed to be changed by discussion. I'm not English, BTW.
So, we're blaming the EU for the fact that the UK government chose- of its own volition- to leave the single market that permitted frictionless trade when "the same standards & rules" were followed?
Clever attempt at propaganda, but that's not remotely close to what I said.
Sick of hearing excuses about how it's the EU's fault for being unreasonable when it was the UK government that willingly signed the Northern Ireland protocol, and when it was the UK government that wanted- and chose- to leave the single market "club" and no longer has the benefits of being in that club.
No longer has either the benefits or the disadvantages, that is why we left, of course and we have to live with the EU's reaction, however childish that reaction may be.
The EU could have treated the UK like other 3rd countries, and accepted that smooth trade is beneficial to both sides. They even signed a trade agreement that accepted that in principle. Unfortunately they then chose to carry out far more zealous checks on the Irish Sea border than they do on the other 41,000 miles of EU sea border, making movement of goods unnecessarily difficult. It's hard to see any other reason for this than an attempt to make post-Brexit relations so difficult that no other EU member is tempted to secede. It makes perfect sense from the EU position, of course, and is not remotely surprising, just disappointingly predictable.
When was that?
The UK's original DP act was 1984 (under a Tory government).
The 1998 DPA implementation of the European Directive was so awful
Yes, the Blair government's attempt at implementing the new EU rules in 1998 seemed to be poorly worded and unclear in terms of the EU legislation.
eliminate the ambiguity resulting from divergent interpretations across member states.
Always a problem with EU law. In an attempt to create regulations that can be agreed to by an increasing number of very different countries, EU rules tend to become complex, ambiguous, and very hard to implement. There's always a fine line between using the ambiguities to make it acceptable at home, without stretching them so far the the European Comission gets upset. Labour failed.
I'm less familiar with the details of the 1998 act, when I was involved in DP it was around the time of the 1984 act, and then more recently with GDPR.
Still, the UK has generally been willing to try and strengthen DP rules above & beyond those in force in other European countries.
the current government's attitude towards the NI agreement *they* themselves signed
Both the UK and EU signed it, unfortunately the EU has been particularly over-zealous about checking it. "Trust but verify" is all very well, but when 60% of the EU's external border checks were happing in 12 miles of Irish sea there was clearly some imbalance. The UK still follows the same standards & rules as it did when it was an EU member, there is no reason (apart from pique) for the EU to attempt to block goods shipments.
Fortunately both sides seem willing to continue discussions, hopefully with a pragmatic outcome.
What's wrong with having a key fob with a button you have to press?
Agreed. My new car came with keyless entry which must be disabled every time you lock the car if you don't want it. I never use it.
Its one saving grace is that the key is only active for a few seconds after it's been moved. If left sitting on a table it becomes quiescent. That way it works when you're carrying it to the car, but can't be used for an unattended relay, which is quite a neat solution.
Surprisingly, a car driving behind a pedestrian is just as fast (slow) as a pedestrian.
The difference is that pedestrians tend to keep their slow pace to the spaces created for them (footpaths) and leave the roads for the faster cars. Cyclists, on the other hand, frequently ignore the cycle tracks created for them on the basis that "I pay my taxes too, mate", and toddle along at 15MPH in 30/40/50 MPH zones. A car driver doing that would be booked by the boys in blue for obstruction.
Not always. There are still far too many occasions when I see a pop-up "An unexpected error has occurred", which is
a) irritating since it implies that there are expected errors.
b) downright annoying: if you don't tell me which fscking error, how can I fix it?
I remember the first CDROM we ever received, it was MicroVAX documentation. One of the guys in the office had an early portable audio CD player and someone said "I wonder what happens if we try to play the CDROM". He put it in, put the headphones on, and pressed buttons. Nothing happened, he turned up the volume, and then...we heard the screech through the headphones at the other side of the room. He dropped the CD player in shock, and was not a happy bunny :-)