Re: Three fingered salute.
They badly photoshopped out the gun she's aiming at the guy?
6299 publicly visible posts • joined 28 Oct 2011
the Tories saying rubbish like "people in this country have had enough of experts",
Why single out the Tories? It's sadly true that many people prefer to believe the nonsense they read on social media over the advice of qualified experts. That is, at least in part, because the "experts" often overreact for fear of being blamed for not having done enough. Then when the predicted calamity doesn't happen, people say "huh, experts, what do they know?".
That's not a recent phenomenon, though. People preferred to believe priests instead of scientists, but they mostly learned better, eventually. No doubt the same thing will happen to the armchair 'experts' on twitter as well. Eventually.
Very much so.
Mid-80s I remember going to a computer graphics show in London, and they showed Pixar's first short "Luxo Jr.". Absolutely stunning, had the audience in awe, and still looks good today.
Times change, though. That show also featured an animation of a flag fluttering in the breeze. Might not have looked too special to an inexperienced eye, but the maths behind it was impressive, especially since it was running on a BBC Micro! Today we get blasé about even the most clever graphics: "Oh, it's just CGI, it's not real".
The US government has the right to take over a patent and manufacture (or contract out the manufacture of) the items which it covers, subject to paying "reasonable compensation" to the patent owner. It's a sort of "eminent domain" for patents, look up "section 1498".
Maybe they could even argue that "reasonable compensation" to a patent troll for a patent to solve a public health crisis would be a tidy $0.00?
Maybe having a beer and swapping jokes is why trade negotiations have often taken 7 years or more.
Or maybe it's because the British government are completely inept?
I think the 7-year reference was to the EU/Canada talks. The Canadians aren't usually inept, so...
it's clear that chemistry and rapport is rather thin on the ground with our EU counterparts.
Hardly surprising when you see who's been doing the negotiating.
Yeah, Barnier doesn't strike me as someone who'd be bundle of laughs over a pint.
f you get good at these things you can get a tremendous amount of stuff done but there are some things, usually little but very important such as chemistry and raport, that are very difficult to replicate digitally.
That's true. Weekly status updates, project discussion, all work fine by teleconference, although video rarely adds much. 30 years ago when it was new we did video all the time, but with a scattered team people rarely even activate their camera these days.
Even so, those meetings tend to be at least semi-formal. Nothing beats getting together in person a couple of times a year to have a beer, swap jokes, and just learn what the person (as opposed to the engineer) is like. I've made good friendships that have long outlasted the project where they started that way.
Trump is a fool, no argument there, but as for "Does he think people will go golfing?", maybe they will. Which is better, sitting in your office with 20 people, or at home with family, touching the same door handles and coffee machines, or walking around in the fresh air with only 1 or 2 mates, touching only your own clubs?
it would be impossible for parents to stop children playing with their friends for 13 weeks because kids will be kids eh?
Which is quite correct.
Kids pay much less attention to hygiene than adults, and touch each other far more freely, so they always spread any bug that's going. They'll do that playing in the park as much as they will in a playground. Forcing them to sit in class, with compulsory and supervised hand-washing before drinks, food or play is likely to be much less risky.
Also, if you close schools and send the kids home someone will have to look after them, and if both parents are working it's most likely the grandparents who'll step up to do it. Since this virus has far more serious consequences for the elderly than almost anyone else it doesn't seem rational to put them in a position of increased exposure.
I think that there is a UK company working on building a recycling plant, and anything which encourages this is certainly to be applauded.
It's not just a right-to-repair issue though, it's something that seems to be completely left out of all the push for battery-electric cars. There's some half-hearted planning for charging networks, but seemingly none at all for end-of-life recycling.
An antenna that size must have 60+dB gain, so pumping 400kW in would give you a very toasty 400GW ERP. That sounds crazy, are my numbers anywhere near right? If so I can certainly see why they don't want it running below 17deg elevation! I'm not sure wildlife flying into that (very thin, admittedly) beam would have time to notice it getting warm before they were turned into a puff of smoking plasma.
we don't know how many people walked past the camera that were actually wanted criminals.
Stats tells me it missed a lot more than it found.
Your second statement is nonsense, given your first one. You have no idea how many people it missed, since you don't know how many there were to miss.
Statistics are frequently non-evident, that's why gambling earns so much money for casinos and lottery companies. The post you're responding to described a perfectly correct and well-known situation when it comes to system errors, and the article's reference to an 87.5% failure rate is indeed complete nonsense.
This is a dangerous experiment which needs to be terminated at once.
What makes it dangerous?
If the computer were directly arresting or executing the resulting individuals I'd agree with you, but that only happens in bad SciFi films.
In this case it flagged up a few people as "worth a look", the police looked, and mostly said "nope, not a problem". Is that fundamentally different from having people dial 999 to report "ere, that murderer wot was on the telly last night, he's in Woolworths on the High Street"?
If it really could be designed as a 'relief' valve for flooding areas,
The big problem with flood relief is that all you can do is move the water somewhere else. If the outflow is tidal then a high tide at the same time as lots of water enters the system upstream will still cause flooding somewhere. Ultimately you need a sacrificial space somewhere to take the overflow.
It would take a barrage of consultants 10 years just to conclude that "actually, this could potentially have the potential for potentially being quite a good idea.
And then some treehuggers would complain that it was going to drown some frogs, and it would all get cancelled.
The emphasis, according to Microsoft, will be on "productivity."
My productivity would be greatly enhanced if I didn't have to keep accommodating to changes & breakages with every Windows update.
(and to forestall the obvious, I run Linux on systems where it's appropriate, like my desktops, but my company laptop is still W10)
I'm pretty sure GDPR applies to EU citizens regardless of where they are at the time
No, it doesn't. There's no mention of citizenship in GDPR (I've read it).
There's quite a good analysis at: https://cybercounsel.co.uk/data-subjects/
Salient points are:
"The GDPR does not actually mention EU Citizen nor Residents. It instead uses the term "Data Subject".
and
"1. A Data Subject under GDPR is anyone within the borders of the EU at the time of processing of their personal data."
"2. If the Data Subject, moves out of the EU border and say becomes an expat, or goes on holiday then their personal data processed under these circumstances is not covered by the GDPR and they are no longer a Data Subject in the context of the GDPR, unless their data is still processed by an organisation "established" in the EU."
That last item is key. It is the location of the data processing that counts, not the citizenship of the Data Subject.
But the government would not accept any alignment with EU laws as the EU is demanding
In other words, the government won't let the EU tell it what laws to make, it will make those which it deems necessary and appropriate. It wants a partnership of equals based on negotiation, not on "do what you're told, we know what's best for you" paternalism.
Clearly data protection to GDPR is necessary and appropriate to maintain trade with the EU, and since UK data protection law has always been stronger than EU minimum requirements there's really no reason (except knee-jerk "Brexit, woe, woe, I hates it, waaaaaah") to assume it would change.
I thought that most people who disengage traction control do it for macho reasons.
Some do, but although it works well when you're overcooking it on an ordinary or wet road, it's a PITA on snow. When climbing a moderate hill with icy patches, every time a wheel slips the TCS backs off the throttle so that you end up stuttering along barely at stall point. Much better to disable it, let a wheel skip occasionally over the ice, but still keep up steady progress.
the car has correctly decided that the worn text was originally an 8.
Which doesn't change the fact that a human driver would know from the surrounding road layout and street furniture that 85 is an unreasonably high limit for that road, and would not attempt to drive at it. Even a Tesla should be able to correlate the signs with a GNSS map.
I remember a colleague who accidentally deleted the on-disk kernel image file on a running Solaris box. Didn't have any immediate effect, the system still had the file open for paging even if the directory entry was gone, but he had a tense few moments hunting round the systems on the network for one with exactly the same OS version. He then FTPed it back to the boot directory, and after a reboot at a convenient time he heaved a sigh of relief when it rebooted OK.
I can't for the life of me imagine why that was implemented,
At the time it was pretty commonplace for a <BREAK> signal from the console terminal to perform the sort of non-maskable interrupt that we associate with Ctrl-Alt-Del today. It was the "stop everything and give me back control" command, useful if the server was hard hung. <BREAK> was sent by having the RS232 transmit line held at 0 (low) for a longish period (IIRC it was between 1 and 2 character times).
The problem was that many terminals would stop sending data and take the transmit line to a low value for a time when powered off, and the server saw that as a <BREAK> signal. I think that there was eventually a patch for Sun systems so that you could disable the <BREAK> response on the console.