Re: Don't bother commenting
Didn't ask me for a subscription, the article was readable without it.
7402 publicly visible posts • joined 28 Oct 2011
I was told that Facebook would prosecute me if I tried to setup an account again - I have never been able to communicate with Facebook about this because you must have a Facebook account to talk to Facebook
So set up the account, let them sue you, and use your day in court to explain why.
In older times "free speech" meant you are able to express your opinion without fear of beeing punished for it.
No it didn't. It meant that you could not be prevented from stating your opinion, i.e. thrown in gaol to stop you saying something.
You've always had to face the consequences of your speech, if what you said was, say, slanderous or inciting illegal behaviour, etc. You had freedom to speak, not immunity from what you said.
Ah, the so-called perverse incentive
cf the "Cash for ash" fiasco.
North Sea is into diminishing returns. If they want to cut energy costs then they need to change how the energy market works. Bringing more oil to market isn't likely to massively change that
Agreed, but while pursuing some sort of joined-up thinking on energy (if only!) that would phase out fossil fuels, it's better to use our own oil than to shut down local production and rely on expensive imports. Didn't we learn that lesson with cars, TVs, etc?
But none of it really sells a vision of where they want to take the country though.
None of the parties is bothered with vision. There was a time when they had a clear idea of where they wanted to take the country, and were able to explain and defend it. Now they just run focus groups to see what people would like them to think, and say they'll do that. No vision, no principles, no clue.
The party bosses aren't leaders any more, just followers, and no-one wants to vote to choose followers.
With sudo you don't need to give anyone root password because their own password suffices if they're in the sudoers file. That means hat if their password has been obtained by somebody else - possibly because they reused it elsewhere - then there's no additional layer of protection. None. Whatever access they have through sudo is now open to that third person.
Which is also true if they've been careless enough to lose the root password. That's a more likely scenario for someone who only occasionally has to use it, and so puts it on a post-it or similar. They are hopefully less likely to do that with their own password, which they use frequently enough to remember it.
The big advantage of tools like sudo is the audit trail. If someone logs in as root using the root password and commits mayhem, you have no idea who it was.
If, on the other hand, someone uses sudo to become root & cause trouble, you know who did it.
In any case, Poettering seems more to be referring to the concept of SUID, and the related setuid() function, which isn't the same thing as sudo. It's more often used to allow specific binaries to run with elevated privileges. He seems to be suggesting that instead of giving the binary itself the privilege (via what is essentially a filesystem permissions bit hack interpreted by the kernel), the user would "ask" systemd to run it with privilege. It's just more systemd empire-building, removing control from the kernel & putting it in systemd. As noted elsewhere, we're rapidly heading toward systemdOS, any day now he'll reinvent containers.
Hmm, let me see
When I was in France I paid €39/month for a flakey 3Mbit/s service, with fibre promised "after 2025", and €19.99 for 4G mobile service with, IIRC 50GB/month, of which I rarely used 2GB.
In the UK I pay £38.99/month for rock-solid 100/20 fibre with a fixed IP address, and £7/month for 4G mobile service with 5GB/month which meets my needs just fine.
Your point is?
Indeed. If you run a bank you don't keep the keys to the vaults in a cupboard on the wall and send memos to the staff reminding them to be careful. The keys are securely stored, with precise rules about who can access them, and a process in place to enforce those rules. Anyone breaking the rules gets fired.
Until IT companies realise that data is as valuable, and needs the same protection, these stories will continue. There's nothing new or unusual about doing this, the security services have such processes and the IT equipment to implement them is already widely available.
the biggest challenge for telcos is legally, safely and economically stripping the insulation, as the ratio of insulation to copper isn't very good on telephone wires, but at least in high volume that can be automated
Or more likely outsourced to China, where some poor villagers will burn the insulation off on bonfires and then return the remaining copper slag for refining.
I thought you were going to say that someone ran a French 1500v train onto the Italian 3kv rail. I suppose that would have been more of a Who Me story...
Then again I know of at least one French mainline station where they had to take an angle grinder to the concrete platform edge, after discovering that the new (German ?) trains theyd bought required a few cm larger loading gauge than the older ones...
So I did it again, put a dent in the desk, and he said "That was fine - try it now". Bugger me if the disk didn't start working....
Quantum 105MB SCSI drives that came with early SPARCstations were notorious for that. If the box wouldn't boot after a powerdown the "cure" was to lift the front up 4" or so, and let it drop it back onto the desk. It usually booted then, but we learned to specify the 200MB drives...
I've always been puzzled why large wind turbines rotate on a horizontal axis, which always requires a tower taller than a blade length with the inevitable flex issues. Wouldn't it be simpler to put a cage of blades on a vertical axis, with the generator at ground level? No need then to have it pivot to follow the wind, either.
Not a single issue could be solved by using the website.
This is the problem with most 'digtal helplines' - they are heavily structured into what someone expects the most likely queries to be, despite the fact that those are the queries where the websites usually do contain the necessary info and forms.
People need to ring helplines when their problem is out of the ordinary and can't be solved on the website, which is exactly when these helplines fall down.
I agree about the Nissan series hybrid ("range extender") model, it gives the smooth EV driving experience and good petrol economy without the public charging hassle and cost.
I disagree with you about PHEVs, though. I have one, and it covers my local driving needs on pure electric (charged at home, using it on petrol is cheaper than public charging points), and for long journeys it's an economical hybrid. It does have the disadvantage of all parallel hybrids, a complex transmission, with a DSG gearbox that is occasionally not as smooth as I'd like. The Nissan model eliminates all that. A PHEV with 40-50 miles battery range and a series architecture would be my ideal car.
You'd have been mortified to learn PAL video cassettes can't be played on NTSC equipment.
Not at all, which is why I had (still have somewhere, I think) a multistandard VCR to play 525-line NTSC tapes in the UK. They were available in the US as well, popular with european expats. The bigger problem wasn't the VCR, but finding a TV that could handle the 625-line PAL output. Probably why they used a projector, they tended to be more flexible. DVDs did make it easier.