Re: Doh..
Product design classes don't teach you how people actually use products, they teach you how the 'experts' think people use products. Even car manufacturers are no longer immune, hence the infestation of touch screens in modern vehicles.
7408 publicly visible posts • joined 28 Oct 2011
the tapered nose to be half the plane even when scaling up. MIght work, but the passenger capacity in relation to the dead weight of the hardware would be ridiculously low
The nose doesn't have to be empty, or even windowless. Weight distribution is always an issue, but is there any reason the nose couldn't be used for storage, fuel for example? Or maybe limited seating, either very luxurious for 1st class, or cramped and windowless for cattle class? Beds?
King Canute did it.
No, he didn't.
Canute was surrounded by sycophantic courtiers who claimed that he was all-powerful. He took them to the beach to show them that he could not stop the tide on command, because he was only a man and could not usurp the powers of God.
families back in the DPRK who would be punished if they defected or surrendered
That would require the state to admit that they had done so, which they're unlikely to do.
I think it more likely that any defecting troops would be simply listed as "bravely killed in action", or some such phrase.
his work credentials, which still functioned after his termination. That means whoever's in charge of your HR exit process should be looking for a new job about now.
Exactly. By all means jail this clown for what he did, but Disney's damages/compensation should be limited to a symbolic $0.01
It would be a very sad world where people gave up the ability to move freely and interact for periods longer than 90 days with a "Why travel?" philosophy.
How many of those people have 90+ days of vacation a year, that would allow them to do that?! I too have friends around the world, but I'm not going to travel to the US (or even to France) for an afternoon's chat over a beer.
Which bit is nonsense? You can read the EU's statement here: https://www.consilium.europa.eu/en/policies/seasonal-time-changes/ The parliament adopted the position in 2021, the Council has not yet come to a decision, nor even a timeline. The directive to fix the date of the change entered into force in 2001, but "Member states are free to decide which time zone they want to be in", so that cannot be imposed on them.
The EU were supposed to be getting rid of summer-time. They should get a move on and implement it
The problem the EU has is that although it can specify when the member countries change to/from summer time, it does not have the power to decide which timezone individual members use. The EU could abolish it, and then find that France chooses to stay on GMT+1 'winter' time, but Spain opts for GMT+2 'summer' time all year round. It's so concerned about the possible chaos that it's easier to do nothing.
In the end all data was stored with UTC timestamps.
Time should always be stored in UTC/GMT, daylight saving is purely a display issue just like non-GMT timezones. Even Microsoft has this right now.
If you store it in UTC there is no "extra hour for which there is no data", there is data for every hour. There is a display issue, if someone asks for the data for "02:30 on October 27th" you need to know if they want 02:30 BST or 02:30 GMT, but that's no different from fielding a request from California where it would be PST. You just need the users to be precise in their queries.
There's not a single mention of the EU in this article, and the UK was never a Schengen member anyway, so this isn't an EU-related issue. The UK borders are for the most part air&sea so deal with travellers from all over the world. The only land border the UK has is with Ireland, where the CTA makes it a special case anyway.
What the blazes was she doing barefoot in the hills ?
I think you can see her shoes (look like plastic Crocs-style) just beside her feet, so presumably they came off when she fell.
I suppose the question should then be "what the blazes was she doing hiking in those shoes?"
But this is the job of the compiler. (hand rolled assembler excluded, though I've not seen any that uses newer features except in very niche areas)
Incompatibilities are due to compile-time options.
That's true, but not everyone has the option of compiling from source. A commercial product might be able to ship a couple of pre-compiled binaries, but won't have 174 of them.
All too often you need to target compiler options for performance, especially for things like a compute-intensive kernel. Compiling for the lowest common denominator of a processor may mean passing on considerable performance gains from more complete/recent CPUs.
Some older CPUs (uVAX comes to mind) handled this by having non-implemented instructions trigger a machine trap, the trap handler could then emulate the instruction from its "bigger brother" in software and return to the main flow. Often gave poorer performance, but at least things would run. I don't know if any of the x86 processors have an equivalent.
However there is no reason that the USB-C standard cannot evolve.
No doubt USB-D/E/F etc. will appear soon, the risk is that by standardising one type over a wide area you create a disincentive to develop a better one, because changing standards takes years of discussion (and rightly so).
By all means recommend a standard, but I'm not convinced that mandating one, and only one, is necessarily a good idea from the point of view of promoting innovation.
Sadly I have done that very thing myself. Complaints from my wife that she couldn't connect to the internet, all seemed fine to me. Checking showed that her laptop wasn't connected to WiFi. After much Windows-related investigating (it's always Windows' fault) I eventually logged into the router to check - WiFi was switched off.
My excuse was that I didn't know that the network activity LED on the Fritzbox is also a toggle switch, which I had bumped when putting the vacuum cleaner back in the under-stairs cupboard some hours previously...
if you use open source you should pay for it. All this effort does not come free.
Surely that's up to the author? There's nothing stopping an author from adding a condition to their licence saying that commercial use requires payment, which was commonplace in the shareware world of the 80s and early 90s. If you don't do that then it's hardly the fault of the commercial user to simply take it & use it, as the licence permits.