Re: "good job the iPhone has Siri,...........
> They don't call me 'clever dick' for nothing.
Now you've done it. Next thing we know, Apple will be patenting that, err, user interface. I wonder if that's why Mac mice only have one button?
7402 publicly visible posts • joined 28 Oct 2011
I'll second the Peter F Hamilton recommendations, I could never really get into Alistair Reynolds.
To add a few names not yet covered here, more lightweight perhaps but still entertaining, what about:
Jack McDevitt, has an interesting take on the abandoned artifacts/first contact storyline. I think he would appeal to Niven fans.
Lois McMaster Bujold's "Vorkosigan" series. Not heavy on the science, but *very* clever character writing. My wife wasn't keen on the militaristic aspects ar first, but I got her hooked after reading "A Civil Campaign" which is practically a SciFi comedy of manners. Some of her fantasy ("Chalion" series) is not bad either, although I really disliked the Sharing Knife sentimental gloop.
I liked Heinlein's style, but I always got the feeling that he wrote half books. I'd be deep in the story, looking forward to the next chapter, turn the page - and that was it. Fin. I gave up after a few disappointments like that.
Granted, the current trend for 6-volume epics is going too far the other way, but even so, there's a happy medium.
> Look in the "KW" columns. Add them all up
and you will get completely the wrong answer.
TV transmitter powers are given as EIRP (Effective Isotropic Radiated Power) which takes into account the antenna gain. The actual power of the transmitter is more like 1/10th that listed in the EIRP tables. A "100kW" transmitter is pumping closer to 10kW into the antenna. For a transmitter like Crystal Palace that reaches 8m or so people, it's a tiny amount per viewer.
Compare that to the costs of powering network infrastructure with an individual feed to each home and broadcast is orders of mangiture more efficient.
Using 'number of support' calls as a metric is a deeply flawed idea in any case. Based on my recent experience it may just mean that a helpdesk familiar with one OS is so incompetent at dealing with problems in another that people simply stop logging support calls.
The resulting "DIY" support solutions that involve the office 'expert' tweaking things based on something they read on the 'net often result in screwed up systems that then fail catastrophically when some otherwise minor problem arises. We'll see.
Ah, I remember that! Our chemistry teacher just seemed amused that we'd learned something. He made us clear up the spill (oops!) and then told us that when he was at school they'd spread it, wet, under the centre part of the lino in the library. By the next day it was dry, class filed in around the untouched edge, and were obediently seated when trhe teacher walked in. An explosion at every footstep :)
I suppose if we'd blown someone's fingers off we'd have been in a bit of trouble...
Until the same disaster hits all the companies using it at the same time, and the DR service goes titsup under the (over)load.
There's a reason why the DR professionals manage this sort of shared backup site carefully, with geographic assignment of resources and prioritized SLAs.
The first part of any BCM plan is the risk analysis. What can go wrong, how likely is it, and how much damage can it do. Everything descends from that. To take your example, I don't carry two phones because having no phone for a day would only be a minor inconvenience. I do have two computers on my desk.
If GG's basic service conditions say "if we go tits up we'll try to get it back ASAP, but it might take us a week or two" then their current model looks just fine. Most people expect a modern phone company to offer 5- or 6- nines of service, but may be willing to pay less if they don't need that. What does GG claim to offer, and do their customers ask?
BCM costs money, it sounds like that's where GG economized to undercut their competition. As always, if something's cheap, there's a reason.
Of course, BCM is an end-to-end concept, it includes checking that all your suppliers have BCM plans that are adequate to meet your service needs. If anyone is using GG for business use, and didn't check this, they really have no cause for complaint. They saved money, and didn't ask what corners were being cut. Now they know.
I don't really see what the necessary connection is between coding the firmware, and the business requirements for it. Outside of multiroom, the phone line has never been used to determine where the box is, even if that is obviously possible, otherwise all the people using these boxes all over Europe wouldn't have been able to do it.. Sky's message to subscribers has always been that the phone line was required to qualify for the BiB discount, even if BiB went titsup around 2001.
This dead horse is probably well flogged now!
> telling me the exact opposite of what Sky employees told me
I can't speak for what Sky /employees/ might choose to say.
I can speak to Sky's official position. Check: http://www.sky.com/shop/terms-conditions/tv/ and scan down to "Interactive Discount Contract"
---
(a) We will pay the Interactive Discount provided that you keep to the Conditions of this Contract.
(b) You agree that, at all times from installation to the end of the Minimum Term, your Box will be fully and effectively connected to a Minidish and to a fixed and operational telephone line in the Territory which is capable of making outgoing calls. If before the end of the Minimum Term, you disconnect your Box from your telephone line and fail to reconnect it after being notified by us that you need to do so, you must reimburse us for an amount equal to the Interactive Discount we paid for the free supply of your Digital Satellite System. This amount shall not exceed £25. If you become liable to pay this amount, we shall notify you in writing
> Remember the clause about having to have your decoder hooked up to the phone line or face extra charges? This is why...
No, actually, it's not.
The early boxes were subsidised by a company called British Interactive Broadcasting, who hoped to make money by persuading people to use interactive premium-rate services. They paid Sky the subsidy, in return for which Sky insisted that the boxes had to be plugged into a phone line.
It wasn't a commercial success, and the boxes got cheaper, so you can now officially opt out by by paying Sky £25 at install time. Or you can just unplug the box as soon as the installer has left, they only check in one specific case: multiroom.
Multiroom is a way to get additional boxes added to your subscription for much less than the cost of an extra full subscription for each one, it's £10.25/month, IIRC. Obviously Sky don't want a group of friends getting together to pay one subscription with several multiroom extras, and then taking the other boxes off to different houses, so they use the phone line to verify that all boxes on one subscription are in the same house.
> Am I breaking the law?
No. European law ("Television without borders" directive) is quite clear on that one. If you can receive a broadcast, for your personal use, without there being any question of attempting to avoid payment (i.e. using a pirate decoder) then not only are you entitled to do so, but it would be illegal for a government to prevent you.
There's no obligation to make FTA services available EU-wide, but there is an obligation not to block those which can be received, for example by jamming, or banning dishes pointed at a certain satellite.
Isn't there a risk of that diverting rocket blast/debris to places you don't want? Why not just put a clamp on the titanium rod, so that the rearmost sliding mount rests on it? Then the nozzle has a clear line of fire.
I am disappointed that there are no exploding bolts in this. I always wanted to build something with them.
Familiar with the area?! If my map said "turn here", and "here" appeared to be 15km of water, I would want to see a damn great sign saying "causeway" and giving tide times before I just drove into the sea.
Most Australian hire-car documents are very clear that the car is not insured when taken off metalled roads. Maybe when these people get the bill they'll reflect on engaging their brains next time they're behind the wheel.
> Crap happens.
Note once you're past about 2 years old it doesn't, it generally requires some effort to produce.
I bought a DVD version a few years ago, but it was hobbled in the way some video games used to be. Even if you "installed" it on a system, you had to have the DVD permanently in the drive to be able to use it. I wanted to put on on my home fileserver so I could access it from a laptop without having to go find the DVD, etc. Couldn't even "install" it conveniently on my laptop because of the nuisance DRM. It hardly got used, and I've recently resisted their offer to upgrade to a new version, even at £9.99 it's no bargain.
A pity, I'd love to have room on my bookshelves for a full printed set. I do have a very entertaining 9-volume encyclopædia from around 1921. Entries like "motor car" are fun...
One problem is that BT have a legal obligation to connect calls, they can't ignore them jiust because they think they might be spam. In most cases no telco can or will act until a formal police complaint has been made, and few people do that unless the calls really cross the line into harassment or obscenity.
As to money, if they are international calls then they may not make money from them. There's an old agreement that assumes international traffic balances out in terms of calls made/call received, so each telco just bills for calls made and keeps the total rather than trying to share out portions of calls according to which network handles which bit. That all changed with mobiles, and may well be different now for fixed lines. but I wouldn't assume that a receiving telco gets much money, if anything, out of receiving this junk.
CLI is a presentation service, where the final exchange can optionally present the caller's number to the person being called. It wouldn't have mattered even if there was no CLI active, anyone with a phone can still be woken up in the small hours by a malicious caller dialling at random.
The problem here seems to be that the info in the SS7 signalling packets was invalid, and that's the responsibility of the originating telco. An ordinary customer should not be able to change the values in those packets, since that would break the whole charging model. The customer may be able to add additional packets, but whoever the originating telco was here should be in deep shit for not validating the signalling info before passing it on. Since Ofcom was able to trace the calls it seems likely that the full signalling info was present, so they should be able to take action againt the perpetrator.
Then again, it's Ofcom we're talking about.
'coz if my Ford opened like that, the hatch would smack up into my garage roof. There's also a supermarket car park near me where I have to be very careful opening the hatch to avoid the concrete beams.
Can we hope this means they've run out of ideas for any more superfluous silly gadgets?
Third option, enforce the quiet zone rules by technology. Screen the carriage so that phones can't work, or add picocells that hijack the phone & refuse calls, or routes them to a machine that just plays back "turn your phone off, dickhead" in all appropriate languages.