Re: True Cost/Efficiency
> no-one much wants the vast tracts of near-lifeless desert that exist
You do realize what dust and sandblasting does to solar cells? Not to mention getting the power from those deserts to somewhere useful.
7402 publicly visible posts • joined 28 Oct 2011
> Yes, we could hire something for extra-commuting activities
In fact even that is unlikely to work once everyone starts to do it, since there would be huge demand at Bank Holiday weekends and Christmas, and low demand for most of the year. No rental company could afford to keep huge fleets idle just in case. And then who would buy them when the rental companies sell off the used cars?
Presumably (IANAL) there's no need to storm any embassies. The UK can simply expel the ambassador and diplomatic staff, and close the embassy. At that point it's just an ordinary London building. The expelled diplomats wil have immunity and will be able to get to Heathrow. Assange won't.
The question is whether the Ecuadorians want to create all that trouble over an Australian egomaniac who is in breach of his bail conditions. Assange should probably have tried the Argentinian embassy (if there is one), they seem happy to stir up trouble with less concern for the consequences.
Calling it "Modern" looks like the hand of the Microsoft PR department. It's quite clever, for two reasons:
1) By calling it Modern, it implies that people who don't like it are boring old farts. If they don't like the new UI, it must be their fault.
2) They can offer a sop to them in the form of the "Classic" (i.e. W7) UI, therefore making it look like they are doing the old fuddy-duddies a favour, instead of admitting that they screwed up and are back-pedalling.
> And the front trunnions which broke
Ah yes, that too. Mostly if you forgot to grease the bottom joint on the kingpin, though. I bought my late Grandad's Marina (I was a student, it was my first car) and it had the same suspension. I remember finding the bolt hole on the suspension arm had worn oval, but managed to replace it before it failed so catastrophically.
No way could a handheld phone ever be considered "high power" RF, even at maximum output. In most cases the power output is minimal since it self-adjusts to the lowest level required in order to reduce interference and maximize battery life. If your colleague's attempt in measuring "RF" (what exactly was he measuring anyway, peak, average, across what bandwidth, etc.?) went "off the scale" then he probably needs to (re)read the manual for his meter. If 2W sends it off the scale it won't be much good for "high power RF" measurements.
Also remember that most of the spectrum used by radio hams is shared in one way or another. Even if the hams are officially the "primary user" there are still designated "secondary users" who will suffer from this interference. In other cases it is the hams who are the secondary users. It isn't just a minority of geeky types who'll be affected.
Case in point is the Olympics, where part of the ham radio VHF spectrum is being used by the secondary user (with Ofcom/RSGB agreement) for the duration of the games. Any PLT that upset radio hams in that range would also screw up communications for the games.
_missed_ the target?
That's how call centres *meet* their targets. If the rules say "no-one must be on hold for more than 5 minutes", they just configure the systems to send busy tone/message to anyone who calls in when the queues are going over 4m30s. Hey presto, target met.
BT used to do that for directory enquiries (back in the 192 days). They reckoned that the way it was set up, they would only miss about 5% of the callers. One of the local areas decided to check, and put a counter on the numbers of calls that weren't queued. Turned out that 90% of calls were getting the "f-off" tone...
> The Nokia smartphone is configured to automatically pair with Bluetooth devices when its
> NFC tag-tapping functionality is switched on. In cases where Bluetooth is disabled, the
> phone will actually turn Bluetooth on and pair with devices without asking for permission,
If I had an N9 it would go back to the dealer RIGHT NOW for that.
I know all the for/against arguments about wind in general, but I do wonder why we don't see more use made of vertical turbines, i.e. ones which rotate about a vertical axis, where turbines in general are viable.
They would be less unsightly, no big windmill-style blades. The generators would be at ground level where maintenance is easier, so there's no need for a big heavy supporting mast, nor of rotary transformers or other gadgetry to allow the turbine head to swivel. They'll work no matter what direction the wind blows from.
Perhaps not useful offshore, but onshore they would seem to have promise. It's a genuine question, can anyone tell me what the downsides are?
While NatWorst were happily double-debiting everyone this week, it seems that there was a Lloyds TSB cash machine in Ipswich that was handing out twice as much money as it was asked for. There was quite a queue before they turnd it off.
No info about whether it was an IT issue, or just someone who'd loaded the £10 dispenser with £20 notes...
> Offices should send folks home. Employees aren't going to be doing much else than staring at screens
Employees like that should be sent home permanently, with a P45* If they haven't got something else to do when their chat program goes away they're just wasting office space.
* For US readers, that's a piece of paper, not a weapon...