Re: @Duncan Macdonald I'd be happy with ...
If that was the case, colour scanners wouldn't work.
Colour scanners use a white light, and RGB detectors. Not the same thing.
7402 publicly visible posts • joined 28 Oct 2011
Locking the users out when the system is infected seems counter-productive, since they'll have to get it fixed. If the process just sat in the background taking maybe 10% of CPU, it could run for years unnoticed. 100,000 PCs all dedicating 10% of their capacity to mining bitcoins could contribute a lot of cycles...
The agencies have brought it on themselves. By being exposed as hackers and probably involved in espionage they have painted a target on themselves for every hack and espionage detected.
Well, that's true of the agencies we know about, but they're probably just fake fronts to take the heat for the real ones.
There, do I get my Conspiracy Theorist badge now?
Also, older USB controllers has this stupid requirement that requires the device to establish communication before it would provide more juice to the port.
Not stupid at all. If you have a USB hub plugged into your PC USB port, do you really want 3-4 devices all deciding to draw 1-2 Amps each, or to have the voltage fall to 3-4v due to current limiting so that devices start to see errors? The intent of the negotiation is that a device can take 100mA without asking, but should negotiate if it wants more. The host device can then restrict the total to avoid overload.
All the "just snip the data wires" ideas will either leave you with 100mA max (for a well-designed host) or the risk of a burnt-out PSU (for a badly-designed one).
The apps can't read the encrypted data on the Oyster card, so all they do is get the card number & then connect to the Oyster website to get the balance. You don't actually need the card or NFC to do that, the app could just ask you to enter the card details as part of the setup. Like much of NFC, this is just a gimmick.
giant wasps
The Zarbi. Definitely hide-behind-the-sofa baddies, as were the Cybermen. I've never understood why anyone found the Daleks scary, though. Boltcutter through the raygun & then tip them over, they're about as scary as an upside-down tortoise, even with a sink plunger attached.
burned the tapes on a bonfire.
Nothing so dramatic. Early video tapes were extremely expensive, and union rules limited the number of times a show could be repeated before a whole new set of repeat fees had to be negotiated, so once the BBC felt that the programmes weren't useful, they wiped the tapes for re-use.
Because of the cost, it was commonplace to make basic 16mm film copies to send to foreign TV companies who were considering buying the series. Those copies were often black & white even if the original material was colour, and were supposed to be returned but often weren't.
When, years later, people realised that old programmes were of interest, they started digging around in archives worldwide to see what turned up. There are some fascinating stories about how they managed to recolour old programmes, sometimes by taking NTSC colour off poor US videos, and combining it with the BW film, and even some experiments to recover colour info that was inadvertently recorded on the film due to the way it captured PAL artifacts.
It wasn't the deflection coils that caused the problem, as much as the degaussing coil around the front of a colour CRT that was specifically designed to demagnetize anything in the vicinity when switched on! Our cleaning lady had a bad habit of neatly stacking any left-around video tapes across the top of the TV...
hardly the fault of the owner, who is never told this
It is entirely the fault of the owner who is told it clearly in the user manual, which is probably still unread and shrink-wrapped in the glovebox from they day they bought the car. Drive the car in such a way that the turbo is red hot and still spinning at 20K RPM, then switch off the engine thus cutting off it's oil supply, and you get what you deserve. It's no different to starting in 3rd gear and slipping the clutch to make it work. You just don't do that if you want the device to have a trouble-free life
Would you be so forgiving of someone who thought that the right way to shut down their PC was to yank the power plug out of the wall by the cable?
The primary goal of virtualizing the set-top box is to move the execution of applications to the cloud. From there, they run in a standardized web browser and are transmitted to various devices as a video data stream (H.264/H.265).
So, they've reinvented the thin client? Again. This time it's embedded in the TV, and you have to pay per-hour communications costs to have your video rendered in "the cloud". Oh joy.
Companies need to understand that 0845, unlike in the past, is no longer a 'cheap' call because the majority of people call from mobiles.
So complain to the mobile companies and Ofcom, not to the owner of the called phone number.
Using non-geographic basic rate numbers like 0845 allows companies to route the call to whatever call centre is convenient for the timezone, while keeping a standard basic-rate charge to customers. That should work for mobiles as well, but the realities of termination costs kick in and the mobile operators pass them on, with a mark-up.
Even more annoying is how 0800 "free" numbers aren't always free from a mobile. Even if there is a surcharge, it should be billed to the company that is receiving the call and advertising a "free" number.
Yes, this article is very misleading. 0845 numbers cost 5p/minute from a landline, although mobile operators can gouge more, up to 50p or so. That's the subject of an Ofcom review at the moment.
To be paying anywhere near £1.50 a minute would require an 09xx number, clearly identified as premium rate.
To say that financial services, the travel industry and public bodies are not included under the "basic rate" rule, and then to say that HSBC, Halifax and RBS use 0845 numbers, imples that those banks are abusing the situation. They are not, since 0845 numbers are charged at basic rate.
Sloppy reporting, or the usual Which? incompetence?
No such thing. If ThinFilm can make it, so can someone else. Between that, and "It’s a physical test, not a cryptographic challenge" it sounds like security through obscurity. We can guess how that will end.
How long until someone buys off a worker in the company to pass on the secret?
Me too, and since there are many people like us, that almost certainly means that the storage available in the BT Cloud is << (2GB * number of customers).
Which I suppose means they should really be advertising up to 2GB ? Maybe we should all use our 2/5/10/50GB, just to see what happens? Start an upload script & go to bed?
Lower the amount the inlet has to be slowed down before reaching the combustor. Historically that has been to M0.5, but raising that to say M0.9 or M0.95
Surely the "SC" bit of SCRAM jet means that they don't need to slow the air to below Mach 1 for combustion?
VT132s were fun, they had a "readback screen" escape sequence. If you crafted the right string in mail you could write something like
DELETE<CR>EXIT<CR> SYS$SYSTEM:SHUTDOWN<CR> to the system admin's terminal, and instruct the terminal to playback the string. By the time he had rebooted the system all the evidence had gone...
Astonishing. You find an error in an IT policy, probably due to a misunderstanding or unclear goals when it was drawn up, and you want whistleblower protection against ending up on a "shit list"?! Do you still put your hand up and ask your boss for permission when you need to go for a piss as well?