Re: No smoking gun?
safety-critical system that has so many potential flaws and has single points of failure (in both code and the hardware) and that is a "smoking gun" to me.
I'd say the most common example of such a system is "the driver".
7402 publicly visible posts • joined 28 Oct 2011
capable of doing miracles like sending up this craft and yet we can't stop killing each other
The one is, I suspect, tightly linked to the other. Without the drive and passion that leads some humans to kill one another, we'd probably never work up the collective enthusiasm to build the space craft. Oh well...
What also fascinates me is the international aspect to it, since (despite having "Royal National" in its name) the RNLI also operates sea rescue for the Republic of Ireland. It's truly a organistion dedicated to a common goal, saving lives at sea, and with both UK and RoI being island, seafaring nations, it seems to transcend any petty differences.
Contrast it to groups like the RSPCA, which seems to have become an activist lobbying group and has long forgotten its real goal. I can't see the RNLI going that way, and you (poster above) have every right to be proud of your part in it. I have friends and family who sail, and although they've never needed you (yet) it is very reassuring to know you are there.
various taboos and customs are put in place to manage the stock.
That sounds like the "Priesthood" approach, which is surely just a variant on the Government-controlled one? People with power (either physical or spiritual) lay down the rules, and define the punishments that will happen if they are broken.
the 1.2L 900cc engine, does it still crap itself when it sees a hill and goes of drying back to Turin
If the rental I has a while ago is anything to go by, yes. 2 normal adults, and it wouldn't climb a hill in anything above 2nd gear. Horrible tinny pile of crap. Not even worth buying as a fashion statement, if I were given one I'd sell it.
One snag to this plan is what to do with the bitcoins when you do get them to some other country. The EU anti-money-laundering rules have made it damn near impossible to open a bank account in another EU country if you don't provably have an address there. There's no legal bar, but the banks just don't want the hassle so they won't do it. Maybe you could move them to the US, if US banks still allow non-residents to open accounts, but many (most?) charge a substantial annual fee for the privilege.
it would have to be upstream from London to hold back the rainwater that's coming down the river.
It doesn't hold it back, it stores it. By closing the barrier at low tide the sea rises on the downstream side, but the basin 'behind' the barrier (upstream) remains low, so all the rainwater flooding into the Thames can be stored, instead of adding to the inflow from the sea. Then at low tide the barrier is dropped again to let the water out. It prevents the sea surge + rainfall adding together.
I had a VMS cluster once (a while ago) which would, from time to time, run like a dog for 10 minutes. There seemed to be no correlation with anything else, and the diagnostic tools we had at the time were fairly basic. The fault never lasted long enough to debug.
Eventually I noticed a huge spike in network collisions when the problem occurred, and on lifting the floor tiles found that one piece of what looked like ordinary 50ohm 10base2 co-ax was actually 93ohm PC network cable (ARCnet, I think). The mismatch was creating collisions and retries, which mostly went unnoticed until network traffic reached a certain threshold.
On a similar note, I had great difficulty convincing our sysadmin why it wasn't a clever idea to use RJ45 doublers to plug two PCs into a network socket, since it seemed to work just fine...
On the first car I had with central locking, pressing the 'lock' button resulted in whirring and clunks as various motors did their stuff. My wife's new Peugeot just makes a tiny 'click'. I still end up trying the handles, I just can't accept that something as supposedly secure as locking both doors can be done without something solid and mechanical moving.
We're moving from the "modern" era of individual computers where developers were their own sysadmins, back to the 1960's timesharing model of huge mainframes somewhere else, managed by expert acolytes, and users who sit in front of a terminal somewhere and see the computer as a service, whose location is unknown and largely irrelevant.
OK, so the "dumb" terminals are smarter than they used to be, and dynamically allocating storage and compute resources on-demand means a bit more than waiting for the operator to load a magtape and a card deck, but it all looks very familiar.
The cloud has been pushed more by marketing types than technical ones from day one, and at least half the companies offering cloud solutions are only doing so because they don't want to be seen not to. It has a momentum all it's own, at least until the next trend comes along.
Security is viewed by both developers and operations as being constantly "in the way".
I have rarely seen this from operations, they tend to see developers as being in the way of security, and with reason. Developers are now, finally, beginning to realize that customers don't care much about performance these days, they can get all they want for next to nothing. Security is foremost in customers' minds now, and the professional developers who get that will be the successful ones.
And as for In a cloudy world you can't just jab a finger at operations and fob an angry suit off on the room of weird socially inept people down the hall.
Of course you can. It just won't be your hall. "it's the cloud" will replace "it's the computer" as the universal scapegoat.
It is a pity that Android doesn't seem to have a way to selectively accept the permissions an app requests. There are times I've seen an interesting app, but when I see the permissions it wants I won't install it.
These aren't necessary malicious "give me TOTAL POWER" apps, but otherwise innocuous ones that want, perhaps, location or camera access. Maybe I would find the non-location or non-photo features sufficiently interesting to keep it, if I could say "OK, I accept all these permissions except 'x' and 'y', but I can't. All-or-nothing usually means it gets nothing.
(excluding the Old T1 and now T3 which are shite).
You'll be glad to know that T1 has just closed, prior to demolition and reincarnation as a T2 extension. Why BA moved their T1 flights to T3, and not T5, though, is beyond me. T5 isn't bad, and if your connection all happens within T5 it can be pretty fast, but once you add the T3/T5 standing-room-only bus journey it goes downhill rapidly.
Still, at least it's better than CDG, with the added benefit of not having to flying Air Chance.
Man its fun watching that happen, although i'd imagine shit scary if it happened to you.
It's scary enough watching from nearby, I don't think I'd like to open the bonnet and look for the air intake while the engine was attempting to self-destruct. CO₂ fire extinguisher emptied through the grille, perhaps?
I get the impression that for many of the services listed the big draw is that they can be used, cheaply, to bypass geolocation, so folks in the UK can watch US Netflix, or those in the US can get to BBC iPlayer. The "Virtual Network" bit is the important one, not the "Private". Surely most people who need really solid privacy from a VPN tunnel, for work, etc., will be using a commercial product supplied by their company, such as Cisco AnyConnect, and connecting back to secured company servers?
Do people really trust companies with names like "Hide My Ass" to, well, securely hide their ass?
And I have to wonder, why do you "dearly like the idea of night driving with IR-enhanced HUD display showing me the road as if it were broad daylight" ?
Presumably so that one can see obstacles like drunks and unlit cyclists as easily as one can in daylight?
Road safety went IMHO off a cliff after speeding fines were automated via cameras instead of putting people on the road.
It's no coincidence that road casualty numbers have recently been increasing in the UK, and are now trending the same way in France just after the French government started installing revenue cameras everywhere.
Maybe some of these university boffins could run a study into that correlation? Methinks the grant money might be hard to find, though.
One charger in the dead center of every 50x50 square would be a charger within 50 mile of you everywhere.
It's technically true, but meaningless. 50 miles as the crow flies doesn't help if it's 100 miles by road to get there, nor does it help if there are 500 vehicles all wanting a charge within that 50-mile-a-side square.
It's like the mobile phone networks that cover "98% of the population". Great if you're in the home counties, useless if you're in deepest Scotland.
It's just a propaganda figure.
5) You would only need about 1,500 fast chargers to cover the entire US or EU every 50 miles.
That's a spurious figure. The USA has just under 4m square miles of area, so that's 1 fast charger per 2500 sq miles. That equates to one charger per 50x50 mile square, which is not at all the same as one charger every 50 miles. Lies, damned lies, and statistics...
My name is not Pat.
There is the old story about the actress Diana Dors, whose real name, the one her home village knew her by, was Diana Fluck. She was due back in the village to open the village fete, and the local dignitary charged with introducing her was terrified about getting it wrong and embarassing himself. He concentrated really hard on getting that 'l' right...so much so that he introduced her as Diana Clunt.
On Linux, I do "ldd /path/to/some.so", see what is missing and can easily install required libs with apt,
Really? I think you forgot the bit where you have to download a new Perl module from CPAN, which takes most of the evening finding and installing the 27 other modules that are interdependent, plus the new (or maybe old) version of GCC you have to install so that you can recompile something you don't need but is part of the library dependencies, and the trendy new scripting interpreter that you've never heard of before and which the developer has used for the startup, instead of using bash like everyone else.
Actually, the leading 9 was chosen so that payphones could easily be modified to connect the calls free of charge.
Not in the UK, it would have been as easy to use 111, since other level 1 calls (operator, directory enquiries, etc.) were already free (DQ isn't free now, of course).
The problem was that in the early days many phone cables were bare overhead wires, and just blowing around in the wind could cause them to dial a series of 1s. They still wanted a number that would be easy to dial on a rotary dial phone in the dark, so picked a number at the other end of the dial where it could easily be found by touch. Then by keeping a finger in the hole, you just rotated the dial 3 times, for 999.
I'd be more suprised if they DIDN'T spy on us
Me too. The Americans spy on the French, and the Germans, Britons, etc. They all spy on the Americans, and each other, it's how the game is played.
No doubt there will be some face-saving diplomatic communiqués issued, but I'd imagine that the real reason for the crisis meeting at the Élysée is not because the Americans spied on French presidents, but that they successfully spied on French presidents. Someone in the French counter-intelligence services is in for a bollocking, and a head or two may roll behind closed doors.
Then again, we are talking about a president who popped out of the palace on his scooter for visits to his mistress, and didn't expect anyone to notice...
And then in the distant future, in a solar system far, far way, maybe another NASA will send another probe to a passing comet, and find Philae and what's left of Rosetta. I'd love to see the reaction to those pictures.