No, they've been crying out for a cheap iPhone. cheaper doesn't cut it.
The 5C is like a reduced-price Rolex, not cheap enough for the people who don't care about image, too cheap for those that do.
6299 publicly visible posts • joined 28 Oct 2011
Alexander. nice and simple and can be abbreviated in a number of ways.
Indeed, Russians would call him Sasha, which seems to have been borrwed only as a girls name in the US.
Americans do have a thing for phonetic pronunciation of names based on anglicized spellings, though. They all seem to think that the Irish name "Caitlin" is pronounced "Kate-lin", and are upset when an Irish person correctly uses "Kathleen". Who knows what 'merkins will do when they see Siobhan, Síle or Aisling in a book somewhere...
You don't really think any of those celebrities that sad nobodies follow actually use Twitter, do you? They pay staff to do that, to keep the fool^H^H^Hans happy, while they're partying with real people. No doubt they'll love this new feature, they'll just hire more PR staff to delete every DM.
.. some service providers reduced the prices of mobile calls when the call was made from home. The kit back then knew when your phone was at home -
Well, not really. If you read the small print on the contract for those deals it says something like "when the call comes via the cell tower nearest to your home", which is something they already know since they know your address. There's a big difference between triangulating a position on the fly and saying "it's from tower 348A, that's the one nearest to Fred's house"
Better than synthesised voice, it's a computer network, so use that. If you dial a recognised emergency number the GPS could be activated and an SMS with the location sent to the emergency operators as soon as the position is determined.. It would not be difficult to have that position information linked to the phone number so that the operator dealing with the alert gets it on-screen, even if the call doesn't go through.
That would deal with situations where a signal is too weak to make a voice call, but SMS can get through, and when someone is unable to speak either through injury or a handicap. A child can be taught to dial 112 and help will come, even if they say nothing.
Make it an option in the phone settings for the tinfoil hat brigade.
Oh, and if you call emergency services on your mobile, dial 112, not 999. 112 allows for a better triangulation of your position from the cell towers. (That's from the advice from the energency services, by the way).
Well they shouldn't give that advice, because it's nonsense. 112 and 999 both connect to the same operators who have access to the same database. Ofcom is quite clear on that: "999 and 112 should, as far as is reasonably practicable, be given equal treatment within the whole of the UK public telephone network". Any triangulation is done through the phone's identity, and has no relation to the number that was dialled.
They only possble advantage of 112 is that the ability of phones to make emergency calls even when locked, or without a SIM for the available networks, may be implemented for 112 and not for 999, perhaps for a non-UK phone.
According to a 'retrospective' I saw a few years back, the original Clangers was scripted, and the dialogue (yes, all the whistling and wooOOooo'ing was a written script) had to get approval. No douby they'll lose all that wit & whimsy with some irrelevant heavy-handed electronic whistles, with voiceover propaganda.
environmental politics at the fore; it;s a KIDS programm, ffs. Stop with the lefty brainwashing in primary school, please.
There is now a UK company that seems to be doing something similar, you effectively buy your own Freeview STB and put it in their datacentre, from where they stream you the output. See http://www.hostmyuktv.com/ I suppose they assume that they're getting round the copyright rules the same way Aereo is, each user is individually receiving the TV and simply doing a remote display.
Supermarkets round here have dropped the "own bag" option, purchases now have to go into the output tray directly, and it must be empty to begin with. Probably to avoid the "unexpected item" errors.
So, after scanning all your items and placing them into the bagging area, and paying, you then have to pick them all up again, one by one, and transfer them to your bag which has to be on the floor since there's no shelf, and if you set it on the bagging area the alarm will sound, while the person behind you is waiting impatiently to scan their single pint of milk.
Online shopping, it's the only option.
The way to solve road congestion is to build less roads
It's an interesting theory, but I don't think it's true, at least not phrased like that.
It's essentially a variant of Parkinsons law; if you provide an increase of capacity on any network then the network use will increase until you return to some level of journey-time equilibrium where the inconvenience of congestion balances the convenience of the additional capacity, unless you've over-specified the network to the point where there isn't enough demand to cause congestion anyway (say a 10-lane motorway between, oh, Monmouth and Ross-on-Wye).
Reducing the network size doesn't solve the congestion problem, it simply reduces the scale, the congested roads remain just as congested, since they are again at equilibrium.
It's equally applicable to trains, of course, although the pattern will be different since train travel tends to be point-to-point, not as flexible as road travel. When the London-Ipswich line was electrified in the 1980's there was a big increase in traffic since it brought Ipswich within commute distance of London. It also caused a huge rise in Ipswich housing demand and prices, houses would go on the market at 9am and be sold by noon.
Tue, not least that McLoughlin was commenting that mobile phone networks need to add more cells to ensure normal 3G coverage along rail lines, so why is Delaney discussing shortcomings of Network Rail's on-train networks, and proposals for some apparently imaginary new network specially for train customers?
If ordinary 3G coverage is OK, there's little need for extra-cost dedicated networks on trains, although WiFi hotspots might be useful for non-phone users with untethered laptops. In any case the "analyst" doesn't seem to be analysing the proposal as made...
I remember hearing that it wasn't the inflammability of the spirit itself, but that of gunpwder with spirits poured over it. If the liquid was less than "proof" the gunpower wouldn't burn. Why that was a useful test I don't know!
"proof" is 50% by volume in the US, 57.1% in the UK.
BlackBerry had grown because it offered a unique end-to-end bundle of hardware, software and a network. But as newcomers entered the market, the company couldn’t decide which part of this bundle was the most valuable,
A familiar story, Sun went the same way, for the same reasons. It could never decide if it was a hardware company or a software company, and ended up vacillating between them unable to make its mind up where to invest.
Anytime these get mentioned by their proponents it's usually with a subtext of "I can't believe people are so stupid as not to use them". Since the technical folks who work in the power industry are generally not stupid, I have to ask "What's the catch"?
Seriously, if Thorium reactors are the cure, what's the snag? Why aren't we using this cheap wonder fuel?
zero emission methane burning
CH4 + 2 O2 → CO2 + 2 H2O
Not zero-emission. What the article you linked to proposes is CCS, carbon capture and storage, i.e. burn the fossil fuels, capture the CO2, and "do something with it". As the article itself points out, There is still the question of what to do with the carbon dioxide, once it has been captured and stored.
It's an expensive stop-gap, punting the problem onto the next generation. It isn't a solution.
If this is a state law, does it only apply to ISPs with servers in California, or to ISPs who offer services to California, or to anyone on the WWW who has users in California, or...
As always with well-meanng internet laws, the proposers have so little clue how the internet works that the laws are generally unworkable and unusable. This one doesn't look to be much different. Kids who want to be wilfully stupid will still find a way to do so, no matter how much they may regret it later.
I have a pilots licence,
But do you fly aircraft where most of your situational awareness comes from high-tech equipment all around you, and the view out the windscreen counts for very little? In that scenario having the pilot remote makes a lot less difference.
The biggest problem I've heard of in that situation is that the remote pilots get "seasick" because their body's sensory input doesn't match what they're seeing via the FR display. Presumably training can help there, at least for some people.
there isn't the demand from the mainstream purchaser for 5 - 10 year old cars despite the fact that their lifetime should exceed that.
True, my first car (as a student) was 7 years old when I bought it, 10 when I sold it. It gave someone else a few years after that before expiring.
Unfortunately the thing that limits the lifetime of most modern technology is the cost of maintenance. Anything which is in daily use for 5-6 years is likely to have components that fail, especially mechanical ones. Even if the components can be obtained cheaply, the cost of replacing them is disproportionate, usually due to the way everything is shoehorned into the smallest space possible. Just like the iPhone battery, replacing the clucth on a car might cost £100 materials, but £500 labour. That's acceptable (if annoying) on a car that is still worth £10,000 but not on one that's worth £2,000 so it creates a break-point where the used value of the object suddenly drops dramatically. It becomes worth buying only at a price where it can be discarded if it fails, even if it might still seem to be worth more in terms of the quality of service that it can deliver when it works. I do still have, and use, phones that are > 6 years old, but I keep them as PAYG phones with foreign SIMs for use when I travel, nor for daily use.
It's the power supply that is the problem.
Another advantage to basic incandescent lights. No PSU, cheap, effective, every component recyclable, minimal environmental impact during manufacture. Concentrate on generating the energy cleanly and efficiently and you don't need to worry about fancy gadgets with false environmental credentials at the points of use.
Locking the users out when the system is infected seems counter-productive, since they'll have to get it fixed. If the process just sat in the background taking maybe 10% of CPU, it could run for years unnoticed. 100,000 PCs all dedicating 10% of their capacity to mining bitcoins could contribute a lot of cycles...