Smartify?
Really?
7402 publicly visible posts • joined 28 Oct 2011
But it certainly was weird to hear that his fertility (or lack thereof) was not an exception in his team, but the rule ...
If true, I'd be looking for nasty chemicals in the plastic wiring etc. before assuming that EM sensibility was even a remotely likely cause. Then again maybe his team all lives in an area with polluted water?
I can remember having to type 'purge' (or something like that) a lot
You could set limits using a command like: set directory /version_limit=n for all files in a directory, or set file /version_limit=n for any single file. IIRC the "set file" command came in a later release, maybe 4.x?
... amateurs.
Not necessarily. Automatic DR fail-over is a mistake often made by amateurs. It may be viable when your secondary data centre is a few blocks away, where you can have guaranteed redundant links and synchronous replication or mirroring, but that's more a case of High Availability than Disaster Recovery. It's a very bad idea when your DR site is 500+ miles away.
If you've ever experienced a major disaster, like an earthquake or flood, you'll know that it can be hours before you really know what's going on. Having the IT systems start their own recovery while the business continuity staff are rolling out the BC plan to the company, can make things much worse. A switchover to a remote site can take a long time, when it involves things like fsck, database recovery/restart, DNS updates, etc. You don't want to do it unless you have to.
Indeed, that could be what happened here, an over-eager decision (manual or automatic) to switch to the remote site, when if they had simply waited for the backup power to come in they could have had just a 5-minute outage like Shania Twain.
Should boiling kettles be banned too?
I'd certainly not be happy if one was boiling beside me in a restaurant, wafting clouds of steam around me and my companions while I was eating, even if it were only steam. Why should I have to put up with exhaled chemical vapours being blown around me, nicotine or not? Have some good manners and indulge at home where you won't bother anyone else.
If you are personally offended by then, you can personally piss off.
No. If you want to look like a tit with your plastic steamy toy in your gob, you can do it in your own home or car. Don't force me to breathe your chemicals in a restaurant or public place.
I don't see any reason to ban them outright, but "No Smoking" zones should apply to fake cigarettes just as they do to real ones.
So many businesses don't give a second thought to the threats the world now presents.
Not new, I'm afraid. 30-odd years ago, when the IRA bombing campaign was happening, I visited a very secure building in London; badges, turnstiles, cases x-rayed, the lot. A minor fire in a kitchen triggered the smoke alarm, and everyone evacuated to the assembly point in a backstreet. When the all clear was given we all filed back in through the emergency exit door. Anyone could have mingled with the crowd.
Unless they kept residency in the UK when they where living abroad, they will not get any NHS when they come back......
Nonsense.
Firstly, 'residency' relates to where you live, if you're living abroad you are by definition not resident in the UK. You may be confusing it with domicile.
Secondly, access to NHS treatment is based purely in being resident. Anyone with a right of residence in the UK (which includes all EU citizens) has access to the NHS. It has nothing to do with domicile.
In France, all over, you see Gendarmerie
The French Gendarmerie are a uniformed military organization, not a civilian one, and come under the joint authority of the ministries of defence and interior, which is very different to the organization of the British police. I don't think people in the UK would be happy to be policed by an armed military group, who are essentially soldiers. The Police Nationale are civil servants.
The "Sound-Proof" verification process, which occurs without user interaction, can determine that a user and their two factor device are in the same room.
Well, technically doesn't it simply verify that the user's PC and the user's phone are in the same room? The user could be lying in the alley outside with his or her head bashed in.
O2 customers’ increasing need to interact over digital channels, rather than traditional customer service telephone channels
And that wouldn't have anything to do with the ability to get an answer more effectively from a website instead of having to sit through interminable "Press 1 if your call concerns migrating hippopotamuses eating your phone, press 2 if you want to pay more, press 3 if you want to buy more ringtones..." and eventually get put through to someone who can't actually help because your problem isn't on the script.
Therefor, people will have their 4K tellies and will not be able to watch 4K content which, of course, they will feel entitled to. That means that the pressure will be enormous to actually deliver on that 55MBPS requirement.
More likely the content providers will auto-adjust the resolution to suit the bandwidth available to the customer, so most people will end up watching in 'ordinary' HD oe less while convinced they're watching UHD "coz it's a 4K TV, innit?"
Great, so now they'll start overcompressing the shit out of their HD channels, to make 4K look worth having, just as they did for SD when HD arrived.
Is there anything on TV anywhere in the world where seeing it in UHD in an average living room would actually make a difference to the viewer?
Fact is it's not a thing whatsoever, and never has been.
But isn't that the whole point? The suggestion is that unscrupulous Chinese companies intentionally put a fake CE mark (not complying with either the standards or the logotype) on a products to give the impression that it complies with the EU standards. If called on it they can reply "Oh, velly solly, you misunderstand. That isn't an EU 'CE' mark, it's just our way of saying 'China Export'. Nothing to see here, move along". There's certainly no official mark, outside of "Made in China".
Can some knowledgeable reg reader explain to me why this cannot be resolved in hardware.
It can to some degree. PDP-11's had separate I & D space, which in those days of 16- or 22-bit addressing also doubled the available memory space. IIRC there was a hardware signal which the processor used to indicate which memory it was accessing, so normal user programs could only read/write data memory, never Instruction memory. I'm fairly sure other microprocessors (some of the M68K family?) had similar options.
I'm not sure it would necessarily solve the problem, though. The processor is still in the loop to get the code off the disk initially and into the I space so that it can be executed, so it has to have a way to write into the I space at some point. That is usually done by switcthing the processor into one of the privileged modes (the inner "rings" as described here) at which point I-space is writable. Since this hack relies on getting the processor into a privileged mode so that memory can be remapped you could probably bypass the protection.
Or, of course, just not design buggy hardware :)
Why is it such a big deal to governments?
Ministers know how pencil & paper work, they aren't frightening. They haven't a clue how computers work, though, so they're scared shitless that they might be caught out not doing something, and hence lose votes.
building a global charger network from scratch,
I can't help but wonder when governments around the world are going to decide that they've lost enough tax income, and start adding sufficient tax/fuel duty to the electricity supplied by these "free" chargers to bring the treasury income up to that from petrol/diesel. Tesla won't be able to absorb that.
If you've ever travelled les autoroutes on a black weekend (major holiday times),
I avoid those Saturdays like the plague, last weekend they broke records with over 950km of total jams on the network! You don't save any time if you can't get close enough to the toll to get into a badge-only lane!
Agreed it's worth having the badge for convenience, I have two, but it still makes little sense to charge extra to use the badge, given that both users and operators win when the badges are used.
Most tolls have lanes for credit cards, lanes for vehicles with badges, and a few lanes with real people who will take cash.
The really stupid thing is that you have to pay for a badge, despite them reducing the staffing costs. Any sensible country would offer a toll discount for badge users as an incentive, but not France.
I'd say one million US dollars would not be much compared to the cost of the PR disaster if this weakness had been discovered by malware users and exploited.
PR disaster to whom? Goggle have a nice fix all ready, the blame for any infections will be firmly placed at the door of Vodafone/EE/SFR/Sprint/etc. who never ship upgrades after the first year or so. Agreed $1337 isn't much, but $1m is way over the top. Maybe $10K and a new Nexus phone?
I automatically refuse any linkedin request from anyone I don't personally know, and instantly bin messages from anyone with "500+" connections, since they're clearly only going for the numbers. There's a practical limit to how many acquaintances anyone can manage, see https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunbar%27s_number
Lots of new cars have "Park Assist", you stop beside a space, put the car in reverse, and press a button. In theory it parks in the space, which requires steering and brake control. Since the hackers noted that they could only control the car when it was in reverse I guess this is the system they used.
I test drove a few new cars with park assist recently. It's impressive in a way, but unnerving, and at least once I had to hit the brake myself to stop the car clipping the one beside it, so the technology is far from perfect anyway.
You can legally watch it, the BBC simply make it technically difficult. If you find a way around it you are breaking no law.
The Beeb of course don't want you to do so, because they make a lot of money selling that content to to other TV companies abroad, and if everyone can stream direct from iPlayer that income will drop.
Good points. As far as
If you have a compromised node in the powertrain CAN system, I don't think there is any way currently to protect against it.
would the standard allow for a handshake with key exchange, perhaps on each total battery-off power cycle? If so you should be able to ensure that you only ever accept a confirmed device as, say, a transmission controller. Any other device popping up later on the bus with that address but not the agreed key would be ignored.
Not foolproof, if you could make your compromised device get recognised as that valid controller at power-on, but it would then need to fully implement all the functions of the device it was spoofing as well, or you'd not get very far.
Surely the infotainment system would be separate from the drive systems?
One problem is that entertainment systems like TVs, or SatNav units, need some info from the drive systems. For example front TV screens must be disabled if the car is moving, certain SatNav features can only be used when the handbrake is on, selecting reverse gear can trigger rear camera display on the infotainment screen, etc. It should not be possible to send information in the opposite direction, but that is what these hacks are doing.
Since it's a bus it's hard to make the bus itself one-way, but this sort of hack suggests that:
- No-one bothers to make the infotainment system secure because "who cares if someone breaks the MP3 player", forgetting that such a system can, when hacked, send data to the bus.
- The serious flaw seems to be that senstive systems like brakes accept commands from all devices on the bus.
All those sensitive subsystems should have a firewall, and a whitelist of bus clients from which they will accept a specific list of control operations,. Any anomalies, such as commands from unexpected sources, apparent address conflicts, etc. should immediately trigger a lockdown and fallback to a safety mode, perhaps a shutdown of all non-essential devices. You'll never be able to guarantee that a device with an external connection cannot be hacked, but you should be able to have the other devices protect themselves a lot better. It seems that few manufacturers bother to do so (some do, apparently).
If in that time I can successfully clone your card and get it back to you so you don't know I've got a copy - A thing we know to be possible because it happens already - then I can keep paying for things with it as long as I never go over £20
There is supposedly a second level or protection, after some small (5-6?) number of transactions the terminal will ask for a PIN, just as a check. I have no idea if this actually happens (my contactless card has a hole through the antenna), nor if Apple pay implements it, though.