Re: Hmmmm...
You didn't actually read the article did you?
You assume that because the research is aimed at "autonomous and semi-autonomous" cars today, it somehow won't end up as a gadget in tomorrow's luxury saloon?
7402 publicly visible posts • joined 28 Oct 2011
Detecting a wet road alone isn't very useful,. Water on top of good tarmac is far less dangerous than water on tarmac which regularly gets diesel and oil dripped on it. A road that is just wet after a shower can be far slippier than the same road after a downpour that has washed all the oil off. Then there's rural wet roads with tractor mud (or worse) on them, the effect of worn tyres, etc.
Sounds like just another pointless gadget designed to lull the careless drivers into a false sense of security. How long will it be before insurance companies start increasing premiums for cars with excessive driver "aids"? They don't care about advertising and boffins, just the hard numbers.
who is to blame?
I suspect that's the wrong question.
My guess (IANAL) is that the provider is to blame, but you will be held responsible. The onus is on you to protect the data, which includes choosing reliable subcontractors.
Think of a purely internal equivalent. You store it on a single disk, which suffers a head crash. Who's responsible, you or, say, Seagate?
The 3 year refresh cycle in big companies really only applies to stuff that is seen to change over that period. We replace servers that often, because we need to be running/testing on the same new kit our customers are. We replace disks because even if they don't die, they fill.
Network equipment will get replaced if it's facing the external world and can't be upgraded to the latest security patches/rules, but internal gear? That gets replaced about as often as the building plumbing does. If there's a blockage, or maybe if there's major rework to move a server or a lab, but otherwise it'll be there until it rots.
but it has no non-Schengen borders as Switzerland is also a Schengen member.
I was thinking more of it's North Sea and Baltic Sea coastal borders, which are considerably easier to police than Greece's coastal borders. All it's land borders are indeed with Schengen countries.
I can understand making it mandatory for those who aren't British or EU citizens
But that's what makes the whole system so silly. In order to know that you're someone whose details don't need to be collected, they need to collect and check your details.
It's the basic failing behind the whole idea of a zone like Schengen. Once someone is in the zone they're supposed to be able to move freely with no other checks, except that this means the outermost borders of the zone have to be fully trustworthy, the "weakest link" problem. Clearly they aren't, with the best will in the world Greece is never going to be able to police all its external island borders, especially given its current parlous state.
Germany, on the other hand, is rich and has a very small non-EU border. It would be logical for it to help police the Greek and Italian borders, but that's never going to be acceptable to either the Germans (for cost reaons) or the Greeks & Italians (for political reasons).
So, the UK (rightly in my view) wants no part of Schengen. This is even without considering the migrant/refugee problem.
Security theatre wastes more time in transport centres than passport control these days, I really don't care if I have to wave a document at a border crosisng, It's no big deal.
There is no such thing as an "Oracle license", it's bound to vary with product, system size, number of users, etc. This is a little like pointing out that a "household" in Westminster spends less on, say, tea than a "household" in Birmingham, and ignoring the likely difference in household size and makeup.
I can't see why you're expecting a fourteen year old to offer much originality.
That says a lot for your expectations of the educational system. When I was 14, originality in essays certainly was expected, and marks given for it. We certainly weren't prodigies, just average (although one of my classmates is now a well-respected SF author).
As always, tell children that you don't expect them to go aywhere, and unsurprisingly, they won't. Give them a challenge and you may be surprised how they rise to it.
a large part of that work is actually unpaid.
Unless teachers are paid an hourly wage, which I doubt, none of it is "unpaid". Like the rest of us, they're paid a salary to do a job, and like the rest of us they sometimes find that job encroaches on times they would prefer to have free for personal use.
They may not consider their salary sufficient compensation for the work they do, that's a different issue, but the work is all paid for.
The truth is, no sane person would spend $5000 on a fucking handbag. But they would spend a couple of hundred bucks on a knockoff, and be happy with it.
True, but if thousands of people do so then the genuine article stops being desireable. Where's the fun in being seen in your £500,000 Ferrari, if there's a £25,000 lookalike parked outside every pub? Don't underestimate the value of being seen to own something exclusive. That's where the luxury manufacturers worry about losing out.
we'll have to splash out on armoured cabling
Armoured cabling? How very passé. Surely the best solution would be armed guards in the basement to shoot the little buggers when they get in, a new listening post to detect any rodents in the area that might have a taste for PVC, and a major extermination offensive to bomb all rat nests within 20 miles?
it's in line with the overwhelming scientific consensus
There is one?
It's interesting that someone is recommending mucking around with the atmosphere to reflect 2% of solar radiation as having a positive benefit on climate change, yet most of the global warming advocates deny that solar variability has any significant impact and insist it's all down to greenhouse gases.
That's why I said "credible". If the FN presented something to parliament they'd vote against it on principle, even if they agreed with it. Le Pen may be getting increasing support among ordinary people these days, and be less of a pariah than her father was, but the main French political class won't touch anything do do with her.
Can @CM explain the build up of random movement comment a bit more...
I'm not CM, but...
The shortest distance between two points is a straight line. If you divide that straight line into, say, 10 segments, and the end points for each segment as calculated by GPS are slightly off from the actual position, the resulting join-the-dots path will be a zigzag. That is always going to be longer than the simple straight line distance between the start and final endpoints.
The landing gear requires dampers to prevent bouncing when taxying or landing. These work by friction and thus affect any reading that may attempt to be taken.
That would surely affect dynamic measurements while the plane is taxiing, but a static measure of weight while the plane is sitting at the gate should not be affected by friction in moving parts. It may not be accurate to the kg, but I'd be surprised if it couldn't be sufficiently accurate to notice the difference between 66 and 76 tonnes.
I wonder if this has anything to do with flightpaths being changed so that there is far loess variation on their approach and departures than there used to be?
No, it's to do with high-powered lasers now being cheaply available online. Combine that with stupidity and poor education, and you get idiots who'll end up in court, crying "But I didn't think..."
But as a font can it be worse than Adrenaline Bubble Outline?
Never mind hypothetical rocks, just have a fleet of little underwater drones equipped with big hifi systems capable of emitting sound signatures of all kinds of submarines, enemy and otherwise. Send them out into the oceans with a drunkards-walk course and watch the sub-chaser drones running in circles. Naval Robot Wars :)
Er no... It was a free app therefore zero profit to both Apple and Google.
No such thing as a "free" app. At the very least Apple/Google will know you downloaded it, that information alone is something they can sell to advertisers. As always, if you're not paying for the product, you are the product.
SECAM was 625 lines like PAL (about 576 visible). NTSC 525 (about 480 visible)
There were various incompatible Secam systems eventually, surviving till Analogue switch off.
There isn't any necessary connection between NTSC/PAL/SECAM and resolution, the UK experimented with 405-line NTSC, and some S. American countries use 525-line PAL (PAL-M). NTSC just suffered from being first, and by the time other countries moved to colour, the minor shortcomings of NTSC had been noticed and PAL/SECAM invented to fix them. That coincided with 625-lines being the norm.
I don't think the broadcast SECAM signals were ever incompatible at a video level (the French system L used different values for sound/video, but SECAM is SECAM), but there was a strange hybrid for VCR recording called MESECAM (Middle East SECAM). It only ever showed up on VHS systems, AFAIK.
The simpler nature of a SECAM colour signal meant that SECAM-only VCRs could use simple circuitry, PAL was more complex to process. The Middle East was a mix of PAL and SECAM (depended on who the ex-colonial masters were!) so for simplicity they just used PAL-type VCR circuitry everywhere, which was cheaper than a true dual-standard machine. The result was an MESECAM recording that wouldn't play back on a true SECAM VCR.
I remember using an old PAL VCR to record French SECAM TV, it played back fine on a SECAM TV set.
Both systems needed fancy computers to convert encoded video signals that were at different resolutions between tape and TV.
I don't remember the resolutions being different, both recorded the visible part of the 625-line picture, one strip per field, with the head switching done in the frame sync interval. The horizontal resolution was bandwidth-limited down to the equivalent of (for PAL VHS) about 240 lines, but there was no need for standards-conversion type of analogue circuitry.
They all use a spinning head to write in diagonal stripes aross the tape, it was the only way to get the high head-to-tape speed needed for video without the monstrous Ampex-type systems of the early pioneers.
Betamax writes at 6.6m/s, and VHS at 4.8m/s, one reason for the better Betamax quality. V2000 is somewhere in-between.
You're quite correct, though, that the heads on the V2000 drum were mounted on a piezoelectric plate, and some clever signal processing allowed that plate to' 'tilt' the heads slightly to one side or another, so that they still scanned the striped tracks correctly even when the tape was running fast, slow, or stopped for freeze-frame.
I'm not sure if that was the cause, but they did have a reputation for wearing heads out more quickly than the other systems, so there are very few left in working order. The only one I ever had a chance to play with had badly worn heads, and wasn't at its best
when a machine actually points out the specifics it's more likely to change behaviour.
How so? I put the dishwasher on when it's full, the washing machine when my clothes are dirty, etc. Knowing precisely, instead of approximately, how much power one of those appliances uses won't make the slightest difference to my usage pattern.