* Posts by H.T.

5 publicly visible posts • joined 10 Oct 2011

Will passkeys ever replace passwords? Can they?

H.T.
Pint

Count me in, please.

This post is slightly off topic. As a system administrator, my two favorite advances over the years have been package management (yum/apt) and passkey authentication. As pointed out in the article, passkeys are simply more secure. Passkey authentication doesn’t send your private key across to the server.

As an administrator I’ve had password authentication for SSH disabled for years. Did people complain? Of course, that’s what they do. They complained when they were forced from telnet to SSH. It’s new. It’s different. It’s difficult. And my favorite, I can’t get my work done now.

Now I can deploy new servers in minutes using configuration management tools that creates accounts with the user’s public key. No more creating passwords, setting force change on initial login and sending them securely to the end user. The teams I work with now have no issues with public keys.

With regards to web site authentication. We forget that passwords had/have their own learning curve. Attempting to create a new account for a website was like inserting a USB key; takes 3 tries. Ever enter a USERID and have “not unique” returned. Resolve that and then your password used a special character they didn’t accept. We’ve moved from a simple 8 characters to requiring long complex passwords with special characters. We forget, passwords can be a pain. Just try to helping someone who doesn’t use computers create an account.

As always, the devil will be in the details.

H.T.

With regards to losing them, unless you're comparing a memorized password versus a passkey I don't see how it's any different. My passwords and passkeys are stored securely on my laptop. Since I have hundreds of passwords I have no hope of memorizing them all and use a password vault with random passwords. I'm using KeePass installed on my laptop.

If I lose my laptop, how is it any different if I'm using a password or passkey. Note, I have multiple backups of my KeePass database (.kdbx file).

Oracle's hardware wing keeps on bleeding

H.T.

I felt the biggest mistake Oracle made was restricting Solaris 11 to new hardware. It turns me off that I can’t test it out. We’re currently down to about 3 Sun systems (SFV440s) in addition to a lot of older Sun systems I keep running. Yes I actually have an old E220R running Big Brother just fine. Solaris has some really good things going for them, for example ZFS. I’ve no complaints with Oracle's migration of our support contracts or the costs. But from what I’m reading it seems Solaris is on its way out, which personally is something I’m sorry to see having worked on it for so many years.

IDC Storage Tracker: NetApp is losing market share

H.T.

NetApp, Run away, Run away fast

If you're thinking of purchasing NetApp save yourself a lot of time and trouble, don't. We migrated to NetApp six months ago, a pair of FAS3240s. The system has crashed twice in 6 months taking down most of our production servers.

Worst has been the appallingly pathetic response from NetApp support. I've worked with all the major UNIX vendors over the past 15 years and NetApp support is the absolute worst. NetApp support is just plain bad. We're not talking about a single experience or a single person, NetApp support has been consistently bad.

NetApp's STEALTH launch of ONTAP 8.1

H.T.

NetApp; Run from this Vendor.

We purchased a filer 6 months ago and have been running 8.01P5 in 7-mode. All I can say is if you're thinking about purchasing a NetApp system, don't, it's quicker and cheaper to just pound yourself in the head with a brick. It's been one problem after another. One weekend, a couple months after installation, the filer failed completely. No recent changes, no upgrade going on, nothing. It just crashed. And 3 or 4 times we've had email alerts that one of the two controllers had failed when hadn't (we're setup in an active/active or HA pair configuration) NetApp software that just doesn't work and support calls that stay open for weeks.

Their customer support seems intent on either proving you're setup is not a validated hardware/software configuration and if that fails they try to sell you professional services. In 12 years of working as a UNIX admin, their software support is the worst I've experience. This is based on working with numerous calls, not just one bad experience.