Re: Anybody...
Errr, give them time and they'll buy all of them.
606 publicly visible posts • joined 7 Oct 2011
Wasted breath....nothing will come of this and it'll be buried amongst many other pre-election posturing elements
Fact is most don't show profit in the UK and that is deliberate and because UK rules allow it. Instead of taxing perceived diverted profit, deal with the root cause. Simply taxing it sends a message of 'OK boys, I know this may hurt a little but I have to demonstrate I'm doing something and really....it won't hurt much at all'
This is not just Google, Amazon, Starbucks et al...it's almost every vendor and even extends to distributors too. They're all at it, and why not, if the rules allow it and it's not illegal?
Bit much to suggest resellers sell this at a loss in order to lock in and see a 'lifetime return'. What time period quantifies as a 'lifetime return' and can a Reseller absorb or even accommodate the up front loss and for how long?. These are Resellers we're talking about not some puffed up big vendor with loads of cash in bank...
why wouldn’t we view [UK disties] Avnet, Arrow and Tech Data as enterprise accounts where we manage them in the same professional way as we would RBS or Tesco?”
1 - they don't deliver the profit RBS and Tesco do...
2 - They're volume players who generally have to work through resellers
Want to be channel friendly? pass on RBS and Tesco.
Headline grabber even if it does touch upon the potential frailty of any such outsourced service. This is largely about investment and it's nothing like a share price based on hot air IPO's.
AWS remains pretty sound although they do face quite a battle with MS and Google.
Has anyone considered the 'soundness' of 85% of channel partners?
A little premature to suggest this...let us wait until the the process is complete.
I have no misgivings about someone building a great business and selling it on for mega-bucks. I do however take issue with that same guy crucifying carriers and those same private equity partners who coughed up the mega-bucks. The model of Phones4U was a spent force...had been for some time and I can bet you remaining players will be carefully watching their backs too.
Once you sell your baby to private equity, who then sell it to new private equity etc etc, decline usually follows, more so when it's used to pay out quick fast bucks out of what's there.
'Phones 4u is seeking to appoint PwC as administrators at the firm, which has a turnover of £1bn and "significant cash in the bank". Its stores will be closed while administrators, who are to be appointed by Phones 4u's private equity owner BC Partners, attempt to mount a rescue plan for the business.
“Today is a very sad day for our customers and our staff. If the mobile network operators decline to supply us, we do not have a business," said Phones 4u boss David Kassler. "A good company making profits of over £100m, employing thousands of decent people has been forced into administration."
Kind smacks to me of throwing in the towel a trifle early...but that is all to easy these days..If it has no contracts then a new leaner business will have no contracts either...or maybe I'm a mug... ;-)
Question that's always bothered me...does HP keep tabs on kit sold into the UK that is 'exported' or sold by UK partners into export markets (Dubai for example), which is then brought back or sold back into the UK? After all, Channel partners are global players with global presence.