Re: So join your local campaign group to stop this
It would be great if someone could offer me a Virtual Private Server with LAMP for this site,
I offer - no charge, of course. And anything else you need.
4305 publicly visible posts • joined 14 Jun 2007
"From my outsider's point of view, it looks like the UK needs the EU more than the EU needs the UK. If that's true, then why would the EU bother?"
You've got it. Brexitter are like someone cancelling their gym membership, and then expecting to make some sort of deal allowing them access to the weights on a friday, in exchange for being able to use the rusty old exercise bike in the shed.
Unfortunately, they still believe Brittania rules the waves, and the British empire is still a thing that those funny foreigners look up to.
Noooo! Are you telling me the result was leave but you dont know what that means? We voted to leave, to go, not to remain... but you find it ambiguous? I
Don't act all sanctimonious. Your own leave campaigners don't even know what it means, seeing as it was all a bunch of lies:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0xGt3QmRSZY
From: this link:
Absolutely nobody is talking about threatening our place in the single market’ – Conservative MEP Daniel Hannan
"Only a madman would actually leave the Market" - Owen Paterson MP, Vote Leave backer
And when you remember that Norway are in the Single Market but not the EU, it makes these quotes quite awkward reading.
"Wouldn't it be terrible if we were really like Norway and Switzerland? Really? They're rich. They're happy. They're self-governing" - Nigel Farage, Ukip leader
"The Norwegian option, the EEA option, I think that it might be initally attractive for some business people" - Matthew Elliot, Vote Leave chief executive
"Increasingly, the Norway option looks the best for the UK" - Arron Banks, Leave.EU founder
Those messages make uncomfortable reading when you look at the post-referendum discussion of what Britons voted for on June 23.
Farage himself said less than two months after the poll that remaining in the Single Market would be a “betrayal” of the 17.4 million people who voted for Brexit.
Bob, Linux did use OSS for some time, but never got it to work properly.. (Inability to play multiple streams was the main one - also the reason all these userspace daemon hacks appeared)
As typical of the Linux crowd, instead of fixing their OSS implementation, they came up with a new shiny-shiny.
Yes, at the time they were most vocal about software portability and microsoft lock-in, they came up with ALSA (where the "L" stands for "Linux")
When Linux people screamed for software to be portable, what they really meant was "it should run on Linux - we don't care about anything else)
So, now Linux has all sorts of audio APIs and userspace add-on hacks, whilst FreeBSD OSS "just works" (yet has to have crappy emulation layers to cope with software written hardcoded to one of the crappy API's)
I named our department after Ibizan nightclubs... I never told the bosses that though... Instead I came up with crappy fake explainations:
amnesia - that was the machine that was rebuilt requiring new memory.
space - that one had loads of free disk space
privilege - The new fast server that it was an honour to be using.
...
Alas no more, the names still exist on my mail and dns servers
Brexiters are that bitter and stupid, yes!
Like the Trump voters, the more evidence of the inevitable car crash, the more they bury their heads in the sand.
But look at the other side. Those of us born EU citizens and glad of it have suddenly had this entitlement removed (I never knew you could be decitizened). And now, they want to take away established domains - owned mostly by those who favour being in the EU. Stop new registrations, sure, but removing entitlement to domains already owned is a dangerous and unnecessary precident.
You Brits did it all to yourself. Who would have thought, there might be consequences.
You realise that such a broad generalised swipe like that makes you just like the feeble minded Brexiters themselves?
For your information, I did not vote to leave, so please, what did I do to myself to get these domains taken off me? You can bet your life no brexitters had .eu domains, so you are only attacking those that wanted to remain.
Congratulations.
Don't they realise that the vast majority of British owned .eu domains are owned by remainers?
First, a bunch of idiots remove my supposed "EU citizenship" birthright, and now the EU beurocrats are going to take my .eu domains?
Can I claim reimbersement for the years in advance I've paid, and can I sue for other loses?
"What is stark in the survey is how much smartphones have become essential everyday tools in our modern lives"
............ NO....... THEY.......HAVEN'T..
Only really for a very small minority... Unless you mean how people consider them essential when they really aren't.
Hell, I've been "online via mobile" since the nokia communicator days circa 1997, but still, seeing how people are glued to their phones 24/7 is depressing...
We're all old farts, that's why!
My first email address had the subdomain order the correct way around (unlike now!). To get to the internet I used to have bounce janet->earn->decnet->internet - and I was resposible for giving Alan Cox internet access back in Swansea uni, and for not killing him in a car crash on the occasions I drove him home (usually via the chippy at 2.30am), so you linux people owe me for that :-)
Oh, and my first modem was 1200/75 followed by 2400/2400 -- luxury!
And yes, I did sometimes upload stuff at 75 baud. Only slightly faster that typing speed!
--------->>>> OLD "get off my lawn" MAN icon
I'm not experienced in such matters, but from what I see, you both make sense.
The problem is, though, that with the lack of net neutrality, companies can now do what the hell they like, such as hobbling access to save their phone service, or - as in the article - push customers to their own VoIP service.
That stinks.
1) Register a domain:whatever.com
2) Create a www subdomain, host a website on it full of criticism and insults against google.
3) Have the IP for "whatever.com" point to one of googles services.
4) User reports or looks up the ip address of the site they think they are on, and they think it's google.
5) ???
6) Profit!
It's too late on a friday night (hic!) to think properly, but I'm sure some evil could be done along these lines... even more effectively, probably, using the "m." bit.
Yep. talk-talks network is sound.
Indeed, I use talktalk.FTTC as a consumer, and have never had an issue - 7.7ms ping first external hop, and always 8Mb/s. It's BT to the exchange anyway.
Their customer service may be crap, but there's a lot of snobbery against them here.
IP6 would be nice, but the HE broker has been 100% stable for me for years, and having the tunnelling done on the router, the internal network is effectively native ipv6. My first ip6 hop is only 15ms.
Wow. I hope you still get paid whatever compensation you would normally get paid.
Anyway, a handy tip for avoiding jury service in the future!
As an aside, in my clubbing days, there was this really cooled chilled out nightclub in Mumbles village, that sorta had an "inverse dress code" - well, not literally, but generally most guys were there in casual jeans, or even shorts and sandals (me!) .
In the clubs in nearby Swansea city, you invariably had the groups of people "smartly dressed" who invariably started fights... The sort who's only other chance to wear a suit is at their court hearing :-)
If they had been kicked out of too many clubs they'd often 'spill over' to Mumbles, and would be refused entry because they were most likely the "smartly dressed thugs".
I was working in London shortly afterwards, and I told a mate there, who didn't believe me.. We visited back home once, and went down Mumbles, and even his casual clothes appeared too formal, and he was only allowed in after I vouched for him!
"You say 'prurient clickbait', I say 'surprisingly well-written news reports obviously produced by someone with a background in criminal court reporting for a news agency'.Either that or it's entirely fictional, hard to tell with it being anonymous."
Hmmmm, are you admitting to a bit of blogging on the side? !
I posted the proof-of-concept that this could be done on this very web site (up to version 5.1 at least) a few months ago, but got no response.
Can I have a belated "scoop" article written please? :-)
https://forums.theregister.co.uk/forum/containing/3520637 (ish) (2 posts)
Apologies for the tone, I was responding to a trolling tosser!
StheD & Cirby, thanks for the replies. I am not l lawyer, and have had no dealings with event bookings from either side, so would have to bow to your experience.
However, as a layman, I'd have thought JohnFen was spot on. If the restaurant aren't privvy to the details of hotel contracts that can effect bookings they are allowed to make, then they damn well should be.
If the restaurant then makes a booking, and - as in this case - it turns out they shouldn't have, how can IGEL be to blame?
As I see it, when the events unfolded, they should have continued to honour their contract with IGEL, leaving vmware to demand compensation from the hotel for any failure to provide what was contracted.
I see it as the hotel totally screwing up here (after all, it's them that forced the restaurants actions) - they should have sucked it up, and dealt with any fallout that occurred. Kicking IGEL out mid-flow like that is just not on. - It makes IGEL out to be some sort of unreliable company that can't organise an event, and/or isn't a reliable payer. I think they are therefore fully justified to sue for losses, and damages to their reputation.
I certainly wouldn't now trust this venue to hold any event I was responsible for.
Cirby, so if that's the case, shouldn't the restaurant have refused the booking in the first place? They didn't know? Sounds like it's their problem.
The way you describe it makes it sound like IGEL booked a peppa-pig convention, then secretly revealed their true selves at the last minute!
> an ancient Symbian Nokia
Me too! I actually bought a "new" one after i'd learnt for myself all the shite that is slurped from android (and it'd not just google - most of the third party app suppliers are bad too)
Bonus? The battery last a week, the phone can be easily dialed in the dark and the rain, it's not as hard to hold as a "slate", and I don't have to worry about things slowing down because youtube decides to launch in the background.
Yep, I'll keep my android hacking to the comfort of my armchair.
Whilst I'm ranting about the horrible shape of all mobiles these days, I wonder, what happened to HCI? Why has user interface gone from practical to fashionable?
A few months ago, I splashed out a few hundred on a high specced android tablet... it's so thin that after a while it digs into your hands a bit, and the edgeless screen means my fingers keep drifting into pressing something I don't want to press... For non-intensive use, I literally use my old £40 tablet more often, because, well, borders, and more rounded sides.
pffft.
"Don't blame net neutrality for this. Even with Obaka's stupid FCC regs in place, Verizon could STILL throttle bandwidth if you went over your plan's data cap.
Stop it Bob. You're better than that.
Yes, nothing to do with net neutrality, and yes, the same thing could have occured under net neutrality.
Why couldn't you have just said that instead of getting all partisan?
But as you raise the issue, the mind still boggles to how republicans can equate rules that say "ISPs cannot arse around with your internet traffic" with "government controlling our internet" - I suppose its' bloody commies... Oh no, you're best buds with them now... Errm. bloody Muslims.
Product codes.... not helped by certain large retailers giving unique model numbers to items they sell, so they can use the "if you see the same model elsewhere for cheaper, we'll refund the difference" line without being bitten:
Quote: http://blogs.thisismoney.co.uk/2012/02/thinking-of-shopping-at-brighthouse-stop-dont.htmlBrighthouse is selling this glossy-black Hoover model, pictured, for a cash price of £703.29. I reckon I found the identical model, with exactly the same specifications but with a white paint finish, being sold online for £469.Correct washing machine catalogue
Could I be 100% certain they were the same? No - because Brighthouse, of course, magics its own unique codes out of thin air, rather than use the standard Hoover codes other retailers cite.
If you edit a post to change it to an anonymous post, it accepts the change, but doesn't actually action it... Presumably the other way around, too, but I didn't test that.
Also, this one still not been answered: https://forums.theregister.co.uk/forum/1/2018/06/08/Jamie_Jones_Annoying_editpost_bug/