Re: Re: article totally misses the point
"ITU resolutions are non-binding by definition"
Is there now some confusion here over ITU *resolutions* and ITU *regulations* (which were binding) http://www.itu.int/en/wcit-12/Pages/default.aspx ?
C.
3533 publicly visible posts • joined 21 Sep 2011
"ITU resolutions are non-binding by definition"
Is there now some confusion here over ITU *resolutions* and ITU *regulations* (which were binding) http://www.itu.int/en/wcit-12/Pages/default.aspx ?
C.
"So the plea has not sunk at all."
Thanks for the feedback, it's much appreciated. Regarding the sinking, that's in reference to any hopes that the ITU treaty could have led to the UK government being obliged to provide the link to the undersea stub. And even if the UK signed the treaty it couldn't be forced to fit the cabling anyway.
As for the funding, although the St Helena campaigners say DfID is still assessing the situation, FCO minister Henry Bellingham said in March that: "The provision of telecommunications within the Overseas Territories is an area of devolved responsibility. On St Helena, it is the responsibility of the St Helena Government."
Yes, we pump cash into the island. Exactly who will pick up the tab for the cable is unclear at the moment.
If it helps, I'll add a link to this effect to the article.
C.
Thanks for all the feedback. I usually copy-edit articles prior to publication, so it's nice to see what people think of my raw typings.
"Seriously? How old is this writer? Six?"
I'm seven and three quarters! Haha, just kidding. I'm 30.
"aimed at people with an IQ above that of a cabbage"
Actually, it's more that we appreciate that our readers' time is limited (you may be grabbing a look at the site during a lunch break) so we keep things punchy, entertaining but dead-on accurate. If you didn't like the headline and intro, the facts are all there in the next few pars. We don't lie to readers, we try always to fly true, but we're biting the hand that feeds IT.
"I can code in Z80 and 680x0"
I can do 6502, 8051, ARM and x86. Is.. is that still cool?
C.
"integrity, we've heard of it"
Haha. You're thinking of this Reg classic? Seriously, though, all changes were made to the article before the Xmas break; I can't offer any info until after the hols.
Merry Christmas,
C.
"El. Reg staff have all buggered off"
We are out of the door and up and away. We'll be keeping an eye on proceedings over the week, but apologies in advance if there's a comment moderation queue backlog.
As for the top banner: whoops! I can only assume the snowfall this season has been so poor our art department has not been moved to set it up.
Anyhow, merry Christmas everyone. Thanks so much for the comments + love.
C.
"We are the source of knowledge, the punters are clueless."
Hi Jim. I fear you've completely missed the point of the article. It's not about the accuracy of WP this time.
If The Reg asked readers for donations while making a tidy profit on advertising, then I'd expect some similar sharp poking as well. I can tell you're a fan of WP but I'm afraid that won't stop us being critical of the site.
Merry Christmas all the same.
C.
Indeed, more or less. See page 3 of this PDF for a chart of how long you have to wait until your conviction is "spent". If you're jailed for more than 30 months, it's never spent. This also affects libel cases in terms of dredging up spent convictions.
If you work with children, law enforcement and other sensitive roles, your convictions aren't spent - you must disclose them.
C.
Feel free to take this discussion to the forum! I've closed this thread so we don't end up forking the comments.
C.
We're obliged to all those readers who've offered condolences at the loss of our heroic playmonaut, who disappeared in the English Channel last week during a Low Orbit Helium Assisted Navigator (LOHAN) mission.
Feel free to share your thoughts here.
C.
Microsoft has been going on about it since 2011, but over time it's become clear the development platform is not that simple.
C.
You're both right! If you click on the link in Andrew's story, Ronnie was incorrectly credited with writing the hit for S Club 7.
C.