Re: I ain't Spartacus
"I'd be interested if you had an update on this article"
I'm not sure there's much more to add, honestly. As much as I love a media conspiracy theory, sadly there's no great collusion here. An article, one of the hundreds we publish a month, riled some readers. It happens.
"Item 2 was some sort of 'anti-radiation' cover for a mobile phone ... If you'd taken the piss out of it, you might have got away with it. "
Er, we did: we wrote 'Weird science? Snake oil modelling? Take your pick as it’s going to be hard for a user to determine...'
"The 'stocking-filler' bit was badly judged"
I'm assured it was tongue-in-cheek. I certainly read it that way after publication.
"Keep up the good work."
Thanks.
C.