No, it's a rare moment in which a Reg writer expresses a positive opinion.
C.
3261 publicly visible posts • joined 21 Sep 2011
"There have been a number of stories in the past that feel the need to explain small details that surely everyone here knew."
There lies the agonising balance between explaining too much and alienating very techy readers and filling an article with jargon and driving everyone else away. It's really, really difficult to do.
Obviously with a story about, say, an IE exploit, you know programmers will read it so you can get down to the nitty-gritty. Really depends on the story. And there shouldn't be anything wrong with expanding the readerbase. How else will we pay the bills?
Also, I'd be surprised if we're publishing less. There's something like 40-45 articles a day most of the year. Forgive us if you can't love every piece.
C.
"the number of stories where the comments are of far more value than the piece itself is growing worryingly high"
I think there's some sort of skew involved here. Here are my own quick thoughts on it.
An article that everyone agrees with sadly generates little comment and people move on. It may be hard to add more value. No one remembers the comments on those.
Articles that spark debate and polarise readers generate a lot of comments, as expected, and if you disagree with the writer then you're bound to find someone in the forum who agrees with your PoV - so suddenly comments "with more value" appear on your personal radar.
Finally, all our writers are working as fast as possible to file their thoughts and findings in a timely manner before a story dies out. They may accidentally miss something or for whatever reason neglect to make a particular point. Hours after someone made the decision to hit 'publish', a thought may occur to someone reading the article and they post a comment. Value is added in the aftermath.
Generally speaking, referring to nothing in particular, terms and conditions apply, your mileage may vary, etc.
C.
"Yet again a writer can't bother giving a lick of any credit to a woman"
Actually, it's because Neil Gaiman is much more well known to readers than Amanda. Pure and simple. Neil is more of an attention grabber than Amanda. There's nothing sexist about that.
Perhaps a few more stunts like this, she'll have a headline to herself.
C.
"how does this guy have any credibility left"
How does that detract from what Florian has said in this particular instance? Yes, he is/was paid to write things. We do know this.
Whenever we quote the guy, all I seem to see in response is "I HATE FLORIAN RAGE RAGE RAGE", and (personally speaking) that makes me less inclined to pay attention to the comments, because such outbursts seem far more biased than the very pundit being attacked.
Ironic, isn't it?
C.
If you're referring to the deleted comment, it was removed for the anonymous abuse. Let's stick to technical discussions.
One thing we forgot to add is that the S III is set to get Android 4.1 Jelly Bean, which has had a lot of NFC fixes and is not the 4.0.4 compromised by the team . Anyway, both hacks are significant in terms of security and skill, and a second story is in the works.
C.
"how is that you glossed over NFC, dual-core processing, a much better screen resolution with motion mprovements and more choice in customization"
If it means anything, this was mentioned in Andrew's previous piece on the new Lumias, published this evening.
No doubt a full review will cover such stuff.
C.
The article does say malicious JAR files were involved - certainly other people infected tell of Java activity in their system tray before the rooting occurs.
I double-checked with Trevor on this point - because there is little gained in attacking a technology without basis - and he said the thing was originally detected as malicious jars - which spontaneously ate themselves. Flash was not installed on the PC at the time; Firefox, Chrome and IE were completely up to date. Acrobat wasn't in the browser. Those last two plugins are alternative vectors for delivering the malware, leaving just Java. And the mystery .jars.
C.
"It's probably just rose tinted glasses, but the Reg seems to be getting worse for this"
I'm not sure I can imagine a Reg that isn't rude about a large corporation. If you want to understand where the Apple teasing comes from, bear in mind that a number of Reg hacks are Apple users and we've suffered and enjoyed Cupertino kit over the years.
Plus, have you seen how much Apple charges for RAM? How is that not a tax?
"The other day they were going on about a Samsung Cameraphone that wasn't even a phone"
Which one was that? Did you mean the Samsung SH100 camera-with-Wi-Fi? There's no mention of it being a phone :-)
C.
Yes, oops. I did intend to fully qualify the USB stick quip by referring to what we'll be carrying in our pockets in the future. Brain fart in the morning. Apologies for the stupid oversight.
Chris W (not Chris Mellor).