Re: Always appreciative of a contrarian view
"a term I specifically associate with the treatment of rape victims"
Well, that's your headache. We don't.
C.
3533 publicly visible posts • joined 21 Sep 2011
No. We weren't. Apple makes a point of inviting every journo and blogger in San Francisco except us. After the public show, they thrust hacks at the gear they've announced so they can do hands-on reviews, take photos, and talk to exec with PR handlers breathing down necks. And they wouldn't want us within 500ft of that.
C.
"50,000 times the mass. What's the diameter?"
The boffins don't say (their paper is here).
However, what we can do is calculate the Schwarzschild radius of the phenomenon, which is 147km.
That means if you take enough material that's 50,000 times the mass of our Sun (9.942175 x 10^34 kg in total) and compress it right down to an object with a radius of 147km, the escape velocity from its surface is the speed of light.
C.
> This sort of reporting ranks alongside such tosh as 'advanced persistent threat' and 'sophisticated cyber-attack'
Bear in mind, I hate those words and usually kill them on sight.
> I read El Reg for their technical accuracy not their ludicrous hyperbole
Why not both? Seriously though, the story has the technical accuracy, and the headline is a headline - have you not noticed that we go a little OTT? ;-) You wanna know the truth? I picked "stunning" because it fitted the space better on the page.
C.
> > In order to register someone as dead a form detailing the cause of mortality needs to be filled out by a doctor within 24 hours of that person's final breath.
> This definitely isn't true in the UK - it can take much longer than that to get an autopsy - but it's not clear from context whether it's talking about Australia or the US.
I've tweaked the sentence. I think the gist was supposed to be that a report of the death must be filed within 24 hours of its discovery (not the cause) at least in the U.S.
Don't forget - if you spot something odd in a story, email corrections@theregister.co.uk so it can be looked at immediately.
C.
"If I really want to read stories based on a series of semi-moronic unfunny tweets linked together with the merest hint of snarky journalism than I can spend all day reading the Evening Standard, The Daily Mail and Metro. I would rather not."
It's August. It's silly season. It's some idiot jumping like a moron on the front cover of a mag. Let us have our fun. Just once. Let us out of the cage, master.
C.
The point it was trying to make is that the software and hardware industries have clamped down over the years on curious-minded people reverse-engineering proprietary products and exchanging information on what they've found.
Obviously 'open' things like the RPi are there to be tinkered with. And if you crack open your no-name ethernet-to-USB printer server you bought for 10 bucks from eBay, and reverse-engineer the firmware, no one is going to know.
But, as the person who leaked the Impero encryption key found, vendors will throw lawyers at you if you go public with proprietary information. It's a tricky subject that can't be summed up in one sentence, so I've killed the line from the article.
C.
> > You keep bitchin' on and on about moderation, which is noise"
> Only after (an) immoderate moderator(s) started rejecting my posts.
Thanks for posting comments and adding to the discussion. If something is rejected, just let it go.
> > and you post corrections when you should email corrections@thereg so we can fix them ASAP."
> It's never malicious. Are you sure skins aren't thin?
It's not about that. It's the fact that we don't have time to read every comment, and we do want every story to be accurate. So if you hide corrections in the comments, we may not see it, most readers won't see it, and it's a losing situation. If the correction is spotted, and the story fixed, the comment loses its context and becomes confusing.
It is so much more efficient to email us if you spot something bad. It's like posting a serious bug report in the app store reviews section on a popular app.
> > Many of your posts are allowed through.
> True enough. If you're ever in the SF office, drop me a line. I'll buy you a beer.
Ta. I am always in the SF office.
C.
"Care to comment in public on why many of my posts (over the last year or so that I've been on "the naughty step") have been rejected"
Fine. You keep bitchin' on and on about moderation, which is noise, and you post corrections when you should email corrections@thereg so we can fix them ASAP. Many of your posts are allowed through.
C.
"I think it's worth ponting out that the forums of El Reg are much more civilised, intelligent and readable than most other forums I've seen. I don't know whether it's the vigilance of the moderators or the moderation of the commentards, but the result is good."
Thanks. When a conversation/discussion is flowing, we leave well alone, go for the light touch or only get involved if someone reports a comment.
By weeding out people who are just here to yell abuse at writers and daub e-graffiti on stories, and rejecting early signs of idiocy, we're clearing a space for a witty and knowledgable bunch of vocal readers.
C.
"the bitching about Windows 10 out of the writers here is getting very old"
Consider it an antidote to the acres of arse-licking in the "tech" "press" over Windows 10.
If you want 100% praise for all things Microsoft, CNN is that way --------->
C.
"Sort yourselves out. You're a mess"
It's an opinion piece - it's the opinion of the writer. We have dozens of writers - some staff, some freelance - and we do disagree with each other.
The Reg is a broad church. Would you prefer us all parrot the same thing, or provide a range of opinion and analysis?
Tedious. Post less.
C.