Re: correlation is not causation.
Aw come on, don't kill the fun.
(PS: we say in the piece that correlation is not causation.)
C.
3495 publicly visible posts • joined 21 Sep 2011
Yes - that's why it's called machine learning. Chess programs aren't AI. They are algorithms and preprogrammed patterns. Airbus autopilot isn't AI. It's algorithms and preprogrammed patterns. Compare this to DQN, which didn't even know what the game controller's buttons did. It was given video frames and told to get on with it. It had to figure it out from scratch. That's where AI wants to head if it's going to make anything remotely intelligent.
Sure, the world runs on algorithms and preprogrammed patterns. No problem with that. Let's just not trumpet it as AI.
C.
Thanks, Nick. All links welcome - don't forget that while most of us Reg hacks have been reading the site for ages, we haven't been working for it's entire lifespan. So the people producing El Reg today for you, based on the values we've long held dear, may have skipped an article or two in their write up. Basically, if you can't see a link, it's because we've been running around on fire trying to make quality content for you, and may have left off some old links. I am sorry.
Yeah, it was a long day and brain wasn't fully firing. Nvidia quoted 120 "Tensor" TFLOPS (see my comment below), which we took to be marketing spiel for INT8. Duh, INT8 is integer so TFLOPS makes no sense. I've taken out the stat because Nv doesn't, TTBOMK, define exactly what a "Tensor" TFLOPS is.
Edit: See article update.
C.
It's actually 120 "Tensor" TFLOPS which we took to mean INT8, but Nvidia claims it is not - so we've taken it out. Last time we asked, Nv wouldn't define what a "Tensor" TFLOPS is, so we've axed that stat and stuck with industry standard metrics (64FP and 32FP).
We've asked Nv to clarify what a "Tensor" TFLOPS is. If they give us a clear explanation, we'll update the story.
Edit: See article update.
C.
By illegal we mean it outlaws the implementation of truly secure encryption. You, as an individual, using it may not be in trouble, but you, an app developer, will be if your product doesn't obey a technical capability notice served on it (that's a backdoor with a fancy name).
C.
"You know they all got them as freebies right?"
Any Apple gear we use, we paid for it. Apple has never given us any gear, not in the six years I've been here. We use a mix of Windows, macOS and Linux on the desktop, Linux on the backend, and iOS and Android handhelds (and until recently, Windows Phone).
C.
Brian said strong prices boosted sales - ie: they charged high prices and yet people still bought their stuff - netting them a lot of cash.
Which is easy when you've got a monopoly over data center and desktop compute.
It's a flippant headline for effect: it's all explained in the story.
C.
FWIW El Reg tried reaching people for comment/confirmation. Chris, who wrote the article, explained:
"We tried contacting Dave by [Twitter] DM and NetApp people by DM and email on Sunday afternoon. After getting confirmation that Dave Wright had left NetApp early this morning, we pushed the story live before any of these approaches had generated a reply. We figured the story was that important."
We've updated the article with new information - and published NetApp's confirmation separately here.
C.
I wish it could be clearer but the problem is that it's a murky situation. It seems what Tanium calls a demo environment was actually a hospital's network. That meant when sales ppl zoomed in on systems to show off the tool's features, it was zooming on real machines. This happened without permission from the hospital.
From the WSJ, which got the scoop:
"For years, cybersecurity startup Tanium Inc. pitched its software by showing it working in the network of a hospital it said was a client ... But Tanium never had permission to present the demos, the hospital said."
So it demo'd the gear using a hospital's IT system without the hospital's permission. I hope that's clear in our story.
And as the hospital and Tanium say, no patient data was exposed - just internal IT info.
C.
"the Windows 10 Mobile version of the Authenticator app has had this, for like, forever."
Hey mate - dunno if you noticed but this article is about Windows Phone and all the people who backed Microsoft by buying into WP and now getting their loyalty repaid by being screwed over.
To the apologists: you can argue that this is a minor feature but the message is loud and clear from Microsoft - thanks for believing in Windows Phone, we don't care about you. Don't expect any more support.
Why should anyone buy into Windows 10 Mobile after this shabby treatment.
C.
The latest Android and iOS versions don't require a password. From the Microsoft blog post:
'Here in the identity division at Microsoft, we don’t like passwords any more than you do! So we’ve been hard at work creating a modern way to sign in that doesn’t require upper and lowercase letters, numbers, a special character, and your favorite emoji. And after a soft launch last month, we’re excited to announce the GA our newest sign-in feature: phone sign-in for Microsoft accounts!
With phone sign-in, we’re shifting the security burden from your memory to your device. Just add your account to the Android or iOS Microsoft Authenticator app, then enter your username as usual when signing in somewhere new. Instead of entering your password, you’ll get a notification on your phone. Unlock your phone, tap “Approve”, and you’re in.'
C.
I don't really understand where you're coming from. It seems pretty straightforward. From the lawsuit:
"The Uber Defendants often transmit or provide the driver with a fee based on a reduced fare amount. The Uber Defendants retain the difference in the fare charged to the User and the fare reported to the driver, in addition to the service fee and booking fee disclosed to drivers."
So, yeah, the lawsuit claims Uber is overcharging passengers and underpaying drivers.
C.
"an attacker and victim have to be associated with the same access point"
For this particular firmware bug, yes. So if you can't get on the same network as the victim, set up a free access point and lure them on. Bingo.
C.
PS: If you spot any errors, email corrections@theregister.co.uk.
Your Qs can be answered by reading the linked-to blog post.
1. You have to enable macros or run the macro. If you think this is a major hurdle, you haven't worked with people. The payload runs covertly out of sight. It waits (blocks) until the download is complete - google WebClient.DownloadFile().
2. Yes.
3. margin2601_onechat_word.exe
C.
It does look too good to be true, however: The Hollywood Reporter and the New York Observer both say they have been in contact with Lucy, a kid who is learning basic web dev skills in a coding bootcamp, apparently. THR and NYO aren't really the sort of publications to make up quotes separately and independently about the same person. I'll be very disappointed in THR if this turns out to be fake.
Crucially, NYO says it has seen the C&D letter. The WHOIS records also suggest TrumpScratch.com predates kittenfeed.com. I've added a link to the NYO story and some more info about the domains.
If there is a PR viral marketing thing behind this, it's not clear who the beneficiary is - it's a long-winded way of touting a porno website, which we spotted and isn't mentioned in the THR and NYO reports.
One odd thing is that NYO is owned by the family trust of Trump's son-in-law Jared Kushner, also an advisor to the president. You'd have thought that may have put off NYO from running anti-Trump news, but OTOH perhaps the title has proper independence (which is a good thing). It did publicly back Donald as the Republican candidate, though.
Very odd, and a bit of pre-Friday fun. It's not exactly Watergate. Take it with a pinch of salt if you wish.
Update: We've seen the DNS records - the domain was registered on March 22, weeks after "Lucy" claimed to have received the C+D demand so it's pretty much Fakey McFake Fakeface. Sorry. Lessons learned.
C.
Nope – Federal Security Service, from the horse's mouth.
Pedantry – Близо́к локото́к, да не уку́сишь.
C.
"What he is talking about, I've worked as an employee and contractor for just over 30 companies. And NONE of those companies is on the same planet as Mark Pesce. I'm an extroverted guy, I like to get in on scuttlebutt, and I've never heard anything like what he is talking about."
I've never had cancer so why are we spending millions and millions tackling it?
C.