"AWS should have to pay the employee"
I do believe AWS has refused to do this.
C.
3532 publicly visible posts • joined 21 Sep 2011
I wouldn't worry about aircraft and spacecraft. Here's how Wind River characterized it:
"Connected devices leveraging standard VxWorks releases that include the IPnet stack are impacted by the discovered vulnerabilities. They primarily include enterprise devices located at the perimeter of organizational networks that are internet-facing such as modems, routers, firewalls, and printers, as well as some industrial and medical devices."
It's not great, it's not terrible. Not as terrible as some other publications have wailed.
C.
Oh yes, we forgot to emphasis that - just assumed everyone was on the same wavelength. RISC-V, as an ISA and community, is still very new compared to incumbents, and today's available silicon is currently up to about Arm Cortex-A50-series performance.
So there's everything to play for. Don't forget: Arm's CEO late last year told a room of journos, including those from El Reg, RISC-V was keeping Arm's engineers and salespeople "on their toes."
C.
Hm, I see where you're coming from. We'll keep it in mind in future.
(Edit: Tweaked the article to include your counterpoints. Completely accept that IPv6 is vast, that it didn't break despite this error which is a good thing, and that more specific routes would have been used. As watchers of IT blunders on a daily basis, who see failures developing a mile off, we were concerned that no alarm was raised, and no fix was applied, for several days, which makes us contemplate more problems in future.)
C.
It's not that smooth in the US. Venmo is a thing because it's faster than anything else available. It also means someone can pick up the tab for a table of six and then request each person's share from them individually - the restaurant will not let you split it more than once.
C.
FWIW, the visa program includes things like fiance K visas and spousal derivative visas, so it's not all employment focused.
Also, I think it's the DS-160 form - if not, it'll be another one you fill in - that asks you if you've ever trafficked child soldiers, built or used explosives, been part of a terror group, etc. So yeah, you would be asked to declare that kinda occupation.
This is what happens if you tick the wrong box (in this case, on a visa waiver form) www.bbc.com/news/uk-scotland-45678517
C.
When Michael Foot was put in charge of a nuclear-disarmament committee, The Times (of London), according to one of its sub-editors, ran the headline:
Foot heads arms body
We're taught it in headline-writing school. I'm dying for headteachers to quit an Arm-sponsored STEM group so we can do the headline
Heads leg Arm's body
It should be no surprise that El Reg editors hoard headline ideas in a black book waiting for the moment to use them.
C.
Sadly, politics is everywhere:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zruGBWLk9s8
Although we try to keep it to a minimum and just to tech.
C.
We could and maybe we will when our tech team is bigger.
> what happens to your page rankings if you don't use Google Analytics
FWIW Google claims GA has no impact on search rank.
https://twitter.com/JohnMu/status/1012320567381422081
Not that we care too much about SEO, as you may have noticed from the headlines and writing.
C.
"What is exactly the information that El Reg obtains out of using Google Analytics?"
Less than we could get out of our direct server logs, which we don't look at. With 150,000,000+ pages served last year, we wouldn't have time. We don't see individual readers.
Our internal stats systems and GA therefore aggregate visitors into tallies: number of people reading in the past minute, hour, day, week, month, year, etc; number of people in the UK, US, etc; number of people who are repeat readers, etc. GA happens to present the numbers in an easy-to-read format (graphs, country maps, tables) whereas our internal tools produce text summaries.
All with a pinch of salt and some squinting as a single IP address doesn't represent a single person, people block Google cookies, and so on and so forth.
Specifically, it's documented on our cookie page https://www.theregister.co.uk/Profile/cookies/ - and on Google. Here's what is collected: https://developers.google.com/analytics/resources/concepts/gaConceptsTrackingOverview
Our privacy policy is here: https://www.theregister.co.uk/about/company/privacy/
> Do you know how many of your users have the "specific code for eating disorders (571) and black people (547)"?
No. Our internal tools count page impressions, ad impressions, and unique readers, producing separate tallies per country we're interested in. Google Analytics does this too, and goes one step further by estimating age ranges, gender, and interests, but we don't pay attention to that because... we think we have a better handle on reader's real interests than Google's tracking bots. There is nothing as creepy as racial and disability profiling.
As I said in another comment, we're not cemented to GA.
C.
> This is California Senate Judiciary Committee not the US Senate
Correct, which we did know, and we've made it crystal clear in the story now. Don't forget to email corrections@theregister.co.uk if you spot anything that may be wrong.
> Why does theregister.co.uk still use Google Analytics?
It's free and useful. It produces easy-to-view summaries of daily, weekly, and monthly traffic, and allows us to compare these year on year, or month to month, and see which regions are growing, and which stories people are most interested in, by views. It also produces a real-time dashboard so we can see the live effect of publishing, tweeting, tweaking headlines, etc.
It's just one source of indications of what works well, and what doesn't, with readers. There are other things we keep an eye on, such as comments, emails, messages, and the effect pieces have on the industry. I'd rather an article forces a company to reverse a bad policy than do mega page views.
However, in an attempt to entice us into paying for Analytics, Google's free version of Analytics becomes somewhat inaccurate after the first 10m page impressions each month, and we regularly smash through that, so we're considering other options, including non-Google paid-for analytics or perhaps rolling our own.
Any stats we quote are from our own internal stats system, which processes logs and isn't set up for real-time analysis. We could make our own form of Google Analytics, but so far we've chosen instead to put our small team of web devs onto other things more directly useful.
> El Reg never has addressed
Well, we do, in a way, in our cookies page - https://www.theregister.co.uk/Profile/cookies/ - in which you can opt out of GA and/or view its privacy policy.
Hope this helps,
C.
Imagine you're designing a battery and you want to see how long it will last. You can either sit through 2,000+ recharge cycles, or 100 and use this regression model to predict its lifetime to know if you're onto a winner.
It mean you can mess around with prototypes and get an idea of lifetimes far faster. Imagine compiling an application and then running it through 1,000 hours of testing before you can iterate on it.
C.