Hair splitting
Yeah, all right, but you get the gist of what we meant. It's in the context of releasing, aka distributing, software. I've taken that sentence out so people can't misread it.
C.
3533 publicly visible posts • joined 21 Sep 2011
It's pretty simple: the databases were found by the folks at VPNmentor. Sometimes they give a publication or outlet a heads-up before going live with their findings. Sometimes it's us, sometimes it's a rival. In this case, it may have been the BBC. If not, then the BBC spotted the blog post before us.
We'll get onto it this week. In fact, we're planning a month-long series of insecure databases to demonstrate that this stuff is rife on the internet. Everyone is exposed.
Edit: Here's the latest S3 leakage: https://www.theregister.co.uk/2020/01/15/open_s3_buckets/
C.
Yeah dude we know.
Every day, we have to make decisions on what stories to write up: what can be completed in time before something gets too old. Stuff has to be prioritized. There also has to be a healthy mix of stories, it can't all the the same stuff everyday.
So if there are enough Linux world patches to fill a monthly roundup, then that may be the best way to summarize it, because we may not have the time or people to write a story every time a patch arrives.
Obviously, the latency in rounding up the patches is non-optimal, and critical ones could be written up immediately because they prioritize over other stories.
C.
Your Pentium from the 1990s is, like, single core, right? So there's space on the die for cache. With 64 cores, you can't bung too much on without producing dies that smash your yield targets.
Look at it this way: there's a total of 4MB L1 cache, 32MB L2, and 256MB of L3 in the 3990X.
And despite leaps in processor technology, it's likely today's software still works comfortably within 32KB working sets anyway, what with the latency issue DougS mentions above in mind.
C.
Hi,
We disable comments on sponsored content - or advertorials in other words - for a few reasons.
One is that this move separates the content from our own independent articles. Sponsored content is commissioned by advertisers and produced externally to the El Reg news team; we don't endorse it. We don't want readers to think it's part of our normal output, and one way to make that clear is to switch off comments.
You say we're "breaking with a system of journalistic feedback," which proves my point: the pieces aren't journalism. It's paid-for content, produced outside the news team, and funds our actual journalism, which is independently produced.
C.
Well, citizens are US persons so we're not wrong. Citizens are a subset of persons.
Bear in mind, spelling out "individuals who are United States citizens or lawful permanent residents, or are located in the United States" every time ruins sentence flow and headlines, and we like to keep things snappy around here.
But anyway, I've tweaked that to just peeps. Thanks for the feedback, and don't forget to email corrections@theregister.co.uk if you spot anything wrong.
C.
Sure, but if you read the article, NHS England talks of, for want of a better word, leveraging 55 to 65 million medical records. All of it.
Whether the devolved NHSes want to fight off these plans or go along with them, or have no choice, we'll see.
C.
The restrictions apply to broadcasters and enforced by Ofcom - print and online is fine. You're not allowed to speculate on voting outcomes, though, which we haven't.
Go into a supermarket, pick up a newspaper, and flick through it to see what print and online is free to do.
C.
That's unfortunately not how secure enclaves are designed. They are supposed to allow application software to run code that not even the operating system, hypervisor, or administrator can access, using attestation to prove there has been no meddling.
Said code is things like DRM (on client machines) or sensitive stuff on cloud machines (when you don't want the remote server host snooping on you.)
C.
"inflated the business's reported revenues"
If you, allegedly, juice up the ad numbers, in terms of ads served and revenue collected, you give investors an inaccurate picture of the business's performance, fooling them into shoveling money into a startup that isn't doing as well as it claimed.
Also investors don't take a dividend at this stage: it's not a public company.
I'll make it clearer for you.
C.
If you look at the logs, you'll see the AI thought Elaine was, at times, a static object - it didn't expect her to move into its path of travel. She did, though, because she was a person crossing the street. Something the AI didn't take into account at all until the final second or so. Or so it seems.
And don't call me Shirely.
C.
Sure, I get what you're saying. Though, you are describing just one scenario (Sprint dies, leaving just T-Mob, Verizon and ATT). There are/were other options, such as, someone else more competent takes over Sprint and turns it around or merges it with someone outside the big 3.
Softbank's mismanagement of yet another business shouldn't let them off the hook. We shouldn't sleepwalk into super-consolidation.
PS: Doom and gloom is our jam. We're an antidote to much of the tech press which is usually hopped up on happy hype pills.
C.
Er, yes, you absolutely do get to gripe about it - how you were coerced into doing something you really didn't want to do simply just to work in the career of your choice. Some of us just fill out an application form and go through interviews. Some people have to, well, you get the idea.
This is exactly the sort of thing you should complain about. Loudly. Repeatedly. Until the abuse stops.
C.
From the paper:
"the lowest well-measured black hole masses [5 to 6 M☉ (4, 5)]. Whereas some models of black hole formation indicate a lower mass limit of ∼4 M☉"
The Chandrasekhar limit is about white dwarf stars, which can eventually collapse into black holes, though it needs to take on mass to do this. The limit of 1.4 is the maximum limit for a stable white dwarf. If you want a black hole out of one, it needs more matter, it seems.
See: https://arxiv.org/pdf/1308.4887.pdf
C.