Posts by diodesign 3496 publicly visible posts • joined 21 Sep 2011
I'm not defending the blockchain hype but if you consider it to be what it is -- an append-only data stream -- it has uses beyond cryptocurrencies, such as log file storage in which any tampering can be detected due to the cryptography involved.
You can do this with other approaches, of course. If you think of BC as an append-only data stream, it melts away the hype.
C.
Ah, it's not. Gross receipts and work attributable to the city are defined things in SF city tax code, so if in doubt: consult your tax lawyer. We have one in San Francisco who does our taxes for us.
When Google fills in its taxes for the city -- it has an office on Spear St -- it will declare its gross receipts attributable to the city and the city will tax them on it. This boils down to:
* Receipts involving property, of multiple kinds, and sales and services in the city
* Payroll in the city
If it feels complex, it is. It's tax law. See https://sfgov.org/sfc/san-francisco-gross-receipts-tax for info.
Edit: I've added a link to more details on GR tax in the article.
C.
No, it just has to do business within SF.
The city's business taxes generally apply to any business doing work within the city limits. El Reg's West Coast office is* in SF so we're familiar with the rules.
C.
* Offices have been closed since mid-March for the pandemic. But amusing that if you look out the window, opposite us is the Microsoft office on 555 California St.
It's up to the US government to prove any exclusionary agreements were made, or get Google to otherwise agree it won't make any such deals in future, whether or not it was found to have signed them in the past.
For a taste of these agreements, see the article, particularly the paragraph beginning:
"Of particular focus is the deal with Google and Apple where Google pays Apple billions of dollars to make Google the default search on Apple’s iOS devices..."
C.
It's that the DoJ legal challenge only seemed to involve select Republican AGs, whereas there is a separate bipartisan effort that got overlooked or ignored. The DoJ shouldn't be partisan like this.
Google, like pretty much every other tech giant and other corps, IIRC lobbies and finances everyone, red and blue.
C.
You're suggesting here that you don't like facts that go against your world view, which I can't do anything about except comment on it. It's something for you to wrangle with yourself.
"The Register's Powers That Be will remember that..."
This isn't how it works. We have in our mind, based on feedback, meeting people, reader surveys, etc, who our audience is and who we want to reach, and we write for all of them the best way we can with facts and reality. You can take it or leave it. We cannot please all the people all of the time.
We also can't get into a situation where we think "oh, better say something nice about X because 50% of readers like X and we don't want to lose them even though X screwed up."
If you're asking us to lie or bend the truth or say nice things about crap ideas to make people feel better, and others feel worse, then, yeah, we're not gonna do that, and have never done that TTBOMK.
And I'm talking news, BTW: if one of our columnists has a particular viewpoint, that's their headache.
C.
You mean, this article doesn't align with your, i dunno, your personal view of the world.
And you can't point at any and every article published before an election and say it's pre-election bias.
"I understand that Californians have a strong preference for lefty politics"
I think you're jumping to conclusions on the political leanings of individual staff members, not that it really matters. If someone does something stupid, we call it stupid -- doesn't matter where on the political map they are.
C.
Or rather, may be addressed by the Supreme Court. In other words, if Congress can't figure out how to write and pass an updated communications law, the Supremes could mull it over and set a precedent. Justice Thomas didn't think the Malwarebytes case was suitable for that purpose.
C.
Hi -- thanks. Could you forward a copy of the message to us, please? There are various ways to get hold of us, from encrypted email to an anonymous HTTPS form.
C.
"how does this help anyone right now? Presumably Microsoft and Linux O/S coders need to add these instructions to the kernels to get the benefit?"
SGX has been around for ages, years in fact, in certain Intel processor families, and there is operating system support for it. What's new here is Intel adding SGX to mainstream Xeon server parts. I've made that clearer in the article.
C.
I don't want to sound like a RISC-V fanatic and also go off-topic on an Intel story, but..
If you pop over to the SiFive website, it has an in-browser processor designer that allows you to configure pretty much what you're asking for: the number of RISC-V CPU cores, the security and integrity check features, various cache sizes and arrangements, the level of floating-point support, bus interfaces, branch prediction, interrupts, etc.
When you're done, the site generates an FPGA bitstream for you to evaluate the processor core(s) on your own board, or the RTL to produce a custom ASIC. There are T&Cs depending on the complexity of the design, and if you go too high end, the site will tell you to contact sales rather than emit design files.
Anyway, it's not exactly what you wanted, and it's not completely flexible, but it's just something I wanted to mention as an example of the chip world going in that way -- and SiFive wants to expand its in-browser tool.
I've used it to generate a simple processor for an FPGA.
C.
It really be like that.
error[E0382]: borrow of moved value
"But," you say out loud after the 20th borrow checker error, "if you won't let me use that structure there, I have to refactor the whole thing. Can I move this to that line there?"
error[E0382]: borrow of moved value
"oh, ok, fine"
--------
It's basically all for your own good. The compiler often gives you the option of cloning/copying an object if you really want to use it in tricky situations but then... it's a copy of the data and that copying is also unnecessarily expensive.
Better just to write it properly the first time, as you should. Good Rust code should be known for its sharp edges -- no cut corners.
C.
I've added a link to an in-depth explanation of YORP by the probe's principal investigator. As you can see it goes on for quite a while, and in all honesty, we ran out of time to condense the effect's description down into an explanation that would satisfy everyone.
Like any product, you have to draw a line at some point and ship it. Articles are no different -- otherwise, nothing would get published because we'd forever be trying to improve or add to them.
I encourage you to read up on it and share here your best explanations of it.
C.
Complicating the matter is that most / a lot of the 11,000 lines are declarations and not implementations, but Google did slip some implementation code in there.
For example, the infamous nine lines in the rangeCheck function that were copied. It's negligible in the grand scheme of things but gave Oracle a gotcha against Google. The function was included as a temporary measure and forgotten about -- oops.
C.
Good question. It's the status quo for the stated reasons: the courts have decided in Oracle's favor (which is why it's at the Supremes now, brought here by Google) and it's the position of the US government.
BTW, personally speaking, I'm not saying the status quo is right. It's just what it is.
C.
Ex-A5000, A3020, RiscPC user/owner here. I learned assembly programming on ARM26 then ARM32 (then x86 etc).
I met a few of Arm's Cortex-A designers around the launch of the A76, which was Arm's first step to 64-bit-only. I was surprised by the rolling of eyes when I mentioned the nice bits of ARM32. It was clear they just wanted to deal with the more RISC-y ARM64.
I got the impression some of the old guard at Arm, and some of the early designers who had moved on, had made their feelings known that ARM64 wasn't, in their opinion, 'real Arm'. Today's engineers, who were working away on ARM64, were fairly hurt by that.
It seemed the ARM32/64 was more than just an ISA split; there were internal politics and philosophies attached, too.
C.
No, I reckon it doesn't. It's a matter of fact: he was at Cambridge. I suspect that detail was included as a way of clarifying exactly who the chap is. Dr Kogan, you know, the one at Cambridge.
What Zuckerberg said (following your link) and what the ICO said are very different.
"I hope El Reg have run that statement past their lawyers."
It's a direct quote from a letter written by a public body to a Parliamentary committee that's a matter of public record. Reporting its contents accurately and fairly is protected by qualified privilege (Defamation Act, schedule 1).
Not that's a problematic quote, anyway.
C.
According to factcheck.org (here and here) that's not quite true. Your premiums were going up anyway.
"...Cruz cites the increase as evidence of how the ACA has 'driven up the cost of health care.' In fact, that increase in employer-sponsored premiums is lower than the premium increase for the previous eight-year period, both in raw dollars and in the rate of growth. The total average family plan cost increased by 97 percent from 2000 to 2008, but it went up by 43 percent from 2008 to 2016."
ACA also means someone can't be charged more or refused coverage for having a so-called pre-existing condition, which seems rather essential to me.
(Speaking as someone who's been on El Reg's company healthcare plan in the States since 2013.)
C.
Yes, that's precisely the point; it's for people who want to manage Arm stuff from their vCenter environment, or who want to try out VMware's SmartNIC stuff via VCF.
Or if you're that much of an ESXi fan, as a standalone host.
I've tried to make this more crystal clear in the article.
C.
True - and there are other Arm hypervisors out there, no doubt - but the thing is, ESXi-Arm can be controlled from vCenter so it should (in theory) just drop right into your VMware environment that controls the rest of your IT, making management feel perhaps straightforward and natural.
Which might be a bit easier than wrangling VxWorks deployments (which I imagine are aimed at individual machines, whereas ESXi is more about automatically wrangling fleets of stuff at once).
C.
Kaspersky says it doesn't know: "Unfortunately, we were not able to determine the exact infection vector that allowed the attackers to overwrite the original UEFI firmware."
So it could have been injected at the factory, in transit, by a rogue insider, by some other admin-level malware, etc.
C.
Bear in mind the very next paragraph clarifies the relationship:
"RHEL is the main commercial release, and CentOS a community-built release based on RHEL, in effect a non-commercial version."
If you think you've spotted something wrong in an article, don't forget to email corrections@theregister.com and we'll take a look.
C.
We're referring to LEDs v bulbs, smart thermostats v unconnected gear, etc, not nuclear power.
I'd say most of us at El Reg are in favor of nuclear power, when done right and all above board. It is a global tragedy that we're still reliant on coal and other fossil fuels for electricity IMHO.
C.
The Register 
Biting the hand that feeds IT
Copyright. All rights reserved © 1998–2025
