404
Copper not found.
Or maybe it was...
104 publicly visible posts • joined 20 Sep 2011
The heads of the groups that hand down fines to these companies should have a simple and large clock on the wall that displays FD/m (Facebook Dollars/minute) and use that number to multiply by 3 months worth of time minimum.
They seem far apart, but displaying their sawy in Dollars per Minute helps to put in mind of those tasked with punishing them, how much power they have, how little they have to care about conventional fines and how meaningless conventional fines and legal systems are from the view point of the sentencing body.
And applied in minimums starting at 3 months of yearly time passing, not working hours, but a full quarter of the year in real terms. This means you potentially get 3 of these in a year before your company is running negative and starting to eat into previous years profits. The 4th would be more than a years full profit.
This is the only way they will actually pay attention.
Until such a time, they are minor inconveniences. Meerly a latte in terms of their yearly profits.
You know at this point in history, I will gladly side with the person who thinks its unsafe.
It strikes me as very suspicious and handwaving to say there is no issue on the basis of "trust me bro"
Even if it is a worry on that one plane, you bring it in, assess, then tell them yes or no if it was a good idea a founded in reality.
If issues as described arrived on the one plane you immediately ground all others and remediate the problem followed by extensive testing and recertification of those craft before returning it to service.
Then you can confidently say yes we looked, here are the results, there indeed was or wasn't a problem and you can rest assured.
The fobbing off of potential lives at risk is hard to take from the company that deliberately crash 2 planes killing 346 people, after ignoring the same warnings before.
As always, my complaint isn't with being advertised to, its the ineffectual use of that advertising.
It would be easy to instead of probing me for my interests in nasty ways, you instead monitor your own site, in the capacity that it is used. Which is watching videos.
Based on that alone I should be getting FAR more varied ads, but no, I get ads, for skin cream and make up, and women's car insurance, and this is about as far from the content I view as is possible.
They run the site, they have the metrics, they refuse to use that information properly and thus I refuse to play the game.
Further from that again is the mindboggling idea that advertisers pay to have their ads shown to relevant interests. That must be billions wasted on advertising products that are not only not relevant, but in more than a few cases legally impossible for me to take advantage of. Accountants get bent out of shape over paperclips, but will fire hose money at Google to serve ads that are wasting money for not even a slim chance at my business, but nothing, no possible gain for the company being advertised for. But its never even mentioned in accounting, it just go into the anomalous hole of "advertising" on the budget.
So since the pressure made then jump before pushed that is clear evidence that they were manipulating the market.
So historical fines going back how many year are in order now? 4% a year or something right? So apply that to all of their finances that have been reported going back that many years.
Because we could use some of it to upgrade the power grid the are leeching off.
One that we have come to expect and rely on.
It is a point of pride that we have not had a non weather related or unannounced power outage in years. Something that many Americans I talk to say is a monthly occurrence.
There is already growing and verbal concern amongst the regular people. It is very good to see that EirGrid is limiting what can be used where and when rather than bowing to the corporate Yankee dollar.
But there will be, no doubt about it, wide scale civil unrest if companies that don't pay fair tax and get other breaks start to bring down the power grid at the expense of public services and the people of the country.
It would likely be a building problem, the first times will be outrage, and then when it co tinues to happen people will take to the streets.
It is worth noting that while I don't know the locations of googles or Microsoft's data centers, amazon were far less conspicuous setting up a massive series of branded warehouses next to one of the busiest motorways, not very far from a very rough part of Dublin, one known for its tendency to set things they don't like on fire.
Who would have thunk it.
Being tasked with installing and maintaining the machine that took your job would be unfulfilling.
From able bodied worker, to just an assistant to a machine. Knowing you will be replaced and another person will carrying on in your place if you can't serve the machine well enough.
And it's a wonder why depression and suicide are increasing.
That's all that happening here.
You start by saying a company should be punished for not fulfilling their duties to the government.
But the government frequently fails to.fulfill anything they say, and what punishment do they get, a fat paycheck, a government car and driver (in a massive great Mercedes) and a massive pension for life.
So all that happening here is Microsoft , coughed gently and nodded back to the accuser and shrugged it shoulders.
This is infuriating to me. They know there is serious security concerns with holding sensitive information, yet design the business such that security is the later thoughts after money.
Anyone operating with this sort of information should be default security before all and then have it verified and tested, not just call it good and expect it not to be pushed, that's how we end up here with sensible, but in context utterly idiotic statements like "we have been humbled" and going forward with security-by-design now that it has happened.
Nah, that should be grounds for the company board and engineers fired and the project given to more responsible people.
Security should be the default JOB 1. Then the functionality while maintaining the security.
Two previous major collaborations between the US and UK, nuclear weapons, and passing the speed of sound in flight, resulted in the UK info being stolen and none provided in return.
Basically using the UK as an unpaid dev office.
And now... Here it is again. Hope its worth the tax payer investment.
"and that was paying £500 a day. WTF do they think they'll get for that?"
£3,500 a week
£14,000 a month
£168,000 a year
That doesn't sound terrible.
Even being generous and assuming a 5 day week
£2,500
£10,000 a month
£120,000 a year
A lot closer to the needed standard for buying a house but still 20k clear a year.
For reference, I get £500 a week, for structural steel. Stuff that carries traffic and hangs above traffic, actual life on the line stuff. If I could get pair 5x for am office job, with much lower hazard risks and mental stress that would be a done deal.
Yes I know there's education in there but that's true for any job.
*One of the recommendations of the report is "that the US government urgently explore approaches to restrict the open-access release or sale of advanced AI models above key thresholds of capability or total training compute." That includes "[enacting] adequate security measures to protect critical IP including model weights."*
Guys, we made it too good, now we have to try to stop people using it.
At this stage, every day is some catastrophe, not even centered around AI, just general incompetency of those in control of most everything.
Please please, stop trying to fix this and just take the brakes off. Its already a fucked up mess, let's just get to the conclusion rather than drip feed life altering doom every week.
"However, the issue speaks of a greater malaise within Microsoft and the Windows team."
This has been a constant problem since XP.
This isn't odd, this is "the way its done".
A change in behaviour would be notable, but this isn't that. Its been this way for over a decade. This is just standard operating procedure, no one has done anything about it in that time, so why would Microsoft feel pressured to do anything about it.
"Both the above destroy confidence in the honesty and integrity of air safety."
At this stage, replace Boeing with any large influential IS business, and we are there.
By zero cause of our own doing we are regularly subjected to american idiocy, where ultimately the non Americans paynwoth their lives, but we still support this bullshit.
The USA need to be treated like the third world dictatorship it is, placed under sanction for war crimes and held account able for murdering hundreds of people outside their borders.
But didn't you know? America runs the world. If america, can tell dutch companies to ignore their government and do what they say, why is it surprising that simple language has gone their way.
We live in a wine country system. Long past then two party option within our, its all just america now, what they say goes.
Its a good thing this planet is beyond our control now, hopefully it just gets quicker now and wipes out humans.
Just have one work on behalf of an mutual benefactor (Epic) and release a third party app(store) under them and funnel the Fortnite downloads that way.
Apple can stop every developer they want, but if that turns into every developer, then they will have to ban all third party development.
Not sure if they are that insane for control but that would be a good test. Turn all apple developers into now rival third party app makers through contracts to make Epics stuff for apple products on their behalf. Sure not as profitable for epic but potentially a scorched earth approach for apple if epic really want to try run them down.
The vast majority of the comments I see are debating this like its an internal thing to the Dutch, but this is all because the US are forcing laws on companies outside their physical borders or control. Its messed up and incredibly worrying that the US is able to exert country changing influence on companies they are no part of and thus get to directly influence global markets by telling various companies to do what america says, not what their own country says.
And of.course everyone agree with the tyrannical US because "they know best"
.*Ah-merica! Ah-merica!*
*AMERICA! FUCK YEAH!*
*COMING AGAIN TO SAVE THE MOTHERFUCKING DAY YEAH!*
This is going to be fun to watch. That's pretty much the bingo card for getting yourself in EU courts.
I see what they are doing though, using the broadness of law to push it as far as they can, so the wording will end up getting so specific after rewrites to pin it down, they will then just rename/switch technology and the ultra specific laws now won't apply to them any more and the circus starts again.
Rrrriiiiiiiiggghhhhtttttt.
So before we had the "choice" of a locked down system, and an open system that allows you to lock it down.
Now we "only" have the option of 2 systems.that can be locked down, or open.
You will note there were 3 choices in the first statement, and 4 in the second... Yes... Somehow to you 4 is less than 3.
I really hope this and other examples are brought up in the on going "make apple open the phone to others" cases happening.
The main point apple always fall back on is the the app store means safety. Well that's demonstrably and repeatedly false.
I don't really expect law makers to actually read relevant news about the thing the a working on. But this is a serious win for them if they see it.
I know the thought behind then post is a different direction but I had a thought too reading the headline.
Contractor reports intrusion, the submitted report gets intercepted by "bad guys" and instead of the authorities showing up demanding full access to their physical systems it is just more hackers who now have actual physical access.
" in an encrypted container beneath three layers of password protection,"
That to me looks like theatrics to get the idiot public to get on their side.
He knew what the CIA was capable of computer wise considering the content of the leak. He would know that password protected folders are not secure against brute force attacks. So adding two more layers is not something they would likely bother doing.
But does it sound like HACKERMAN behaviour? To the average layman yeah.
Do keep in mind the the FBI took over, maintained, hosted and operated a fully functional CSAM website/forum for more than a year "to catch more criminals"
The FBI served and supplied CSAM willingly.
So apart from the FBI being a literal CSAM producing entity... They clearly have access to as much of it as they like for what ever reason. Wouldn't be a huge should to get some buddies in contact to make some files appear where they would be convenient if found.