Re: No problem!
Given the number of times that I, for one, have crashed various rockets in KSP, perhaps what's needed would be elite kerbelnauts...
1641 posts • joined 14 Jun 2007
The main prob with an RTX2060 is that it costs almost as much, by itself, as my entire system cost, case, power supply, mobo, CPU, 8 GB RAM, 1 TB HDD, _and_ the GT-710. I literally spent $100 on the GT-710, though I probably could have found it cheaper if I'd tried. The rest of the system was about $600. (I got the OS for free. MS Dreamspark, now Imagine.) RTX-2060s start at $590 and head upwards real fast.
Heh. The mobo on my main Windows machine is also an Asus... an Asus P8B75-M. A super board it ain't. It has an i5-3570 on it, and a GT-710 video card. It was never intended to be a gamer box, just to give adequate speed at an acceptable price while doing simple tasks; it's done so for nearly a decade. Thebox it replaced had had a Pentium 4 CPU, and had lasted from 2005. Indeed, the Pentium box remained my secondary box for another five years, until it had a loss of magic smoke incident involving a power failure and a UPS which picked the wrong time to die. I see no reason to scrap working equipment just because MS goes nuts.
The possibility exists that I'll be getting a new box Real Soon Now. However, given MS's antics, the probability is high that the next box will be a Mac of some type, probably with an Apple Mx chip... and it seems that MS has gone way out of their way to make it difficult for Win 11 to run on Apple chips. Seems as though a machine running Win 11 won't be showing up at home until next year. Or maybe the year after that. Or maybe even later than that.
Good work, there, MS. You've made a sale for Apple. Maybe two. Congrats.
Enterprise is a traditional carrier name; CVN-80 is the third carrier named Enterprise. Doris Miller should have had the Medal of Honor for his actions at Pearl Harbor, and would have had it instead of the Navy Cross he did get, if he had been white. As he was black he was damn lucky to get the Navy Cross. Finally naming a carrier for him is the least the USN can do. USS Miller FF-1091 was named for him.
Carriers were traditionally named for Revolutionary War battles (Saratoga, Lexington, Yorktown) or ships in the Revolutionary War and/or the War of 1812 (Wasp, Hornet, Enterprise). Enterprise CVN-65 was named for Enterprise CV-6; Enterprise CVN-80 was named for Enterprise CVN-65. Starting with the Nimitz class, carriers were named for people (John Kennedy and Theodore Roosevelt had carriers named for them prior to Nimitz, but they were special cases.) Note that Nimitz was an admiral and Stennis was a senator, not a prez.
Some traditional carrier names have been assigned to amphibious warfare ships which would be called carriers if serving in any navy other than the USN; the latest Wasp is an amphibious assault ship. Others were used by AEGIS cruisers, also named for Revolutionary War battles; the latest Yorktown is an AEGIS cruiser, not a carrier.
Thalidomide _is_ perfectly safe... if you're not pregnant. Specifically, if you're not at a specific stage of pregnancy. So it's perfectly safe for 50% of the adult population 100% of the time, and for the other 50% 90+% of the time. It's hideously unsafe for the last few, though. Or rather for the fetuses the last few are carrying.
Seriously, look up aspirin and penicillin. If either of them had been first proposed in a modern testing environment, neither would have been approved. They'd never get past the animal testing, one kills guinea pigs and one blinds rabbits. (I don't remember which, and reading about it was too depressing so I'm not digging up the article again.) Penicillin is fatal to a small percentage of humans, and will make another small percentage very sick indeed.A lot of people have problems with aspirin (I'm one of them...) And yet both of them are still in use... (I can handle low-dosages of aspirin. Some others can't even do that.)
There's a long list of drugs which will cause problems in a small percentage of people. A very long list. (Any diabetics out there? Let me just mention metformin. And that one is by no means the most egregious example...)
'Vaccine hesitancy' _is_ irrational.
Hit 'im again. Harder. [gets popcorn].
Silly twit doesn't know how lucky he is that Linus lit him up, not me. One of my nieces died, at only 25, of covid crap. I get VERY ANNOYED with anti-vaxxer idiots.
At the office, we provided transport, in company vehicles, on company time, to sites doing mass vaccinations. And then we set up our own mass vaccination. Those who aren't vaccinated have been advised that they may not be allowed on premises; a lot of work is from home, but not all of it. If you need to be on prem, you need to be vaccinated. You need to work on prem but don't want to be vaccinated? Start looking for another job, mate, you're not gonna be here for long. This is a Right To Work state, and we can fire anyone, at any time, for any reason or no reason at all, so long as the person isn't one of the Protected Categories. Anti-vaxxers ain't on the list. We checked.
We had some refuse to go when we sent the company vehicles to pick them up and take them to be vaccinated; so long as they're working from home, we don't care. They're not getting into the building, though.
Not if the original document has tables, or captioned figures or even just more than one column per page. Almost all OCR has serious trouble with tables and columns. Inserting a scanned in, not OCRed, picture of a page is worse. Unless the pic is high res, the text in it will be blurry... which is why the pic has to be high res just to OCR it. And you're at the mercy of whatever ink/toner was used, and what kind of paper, and how old it is. Extracting text from that mess is very difficult.
She's lucky. My Apple Watch (which I did NOT buy, it was a purchase for me by someone who should have had more sense but whom it would be unsafe to insult by not using the damn thing) updated. Battery life promptly died. This morning it was 21%; I charged it to 99%... and within a few hours it was down to 81%. And falling rapidly.
Does anyone know how to remove an 'update'?
Errr... people like HR shouldn't have anything saved locally, they should all be connected to something on a server or two. Which means that if they need to re-image a drive because some HR twit has done something stupid, then nothing was lost, except the HR twits' (and the tech who has to apply the fix) time.
And I rather expect that the HR twits in question would have to bring their borked box in so it could be looked at. At which point it's no longer off-site.
Now, if the HR twit put something onto local storage and then borked the box, well that come under "How sad, too bad, you just lost the lot, don't ever do that again." Certainly it's a termination offense _here_ if someone manages to store files locally instead of on the server where they're supposed to be. We go to a _lot_ of trouble to make local storage difficult, precisely so users can't say that they didn't know and did it by accident. YMMV. That's _remote_ storage, in _our_ cloud, not using other clouds; 3rd-party clouds (note plural) are backup, not active storage. And they supplement, but do not replace, tape. Lots and lots and lots of tape. Accounting has, on occasion, asked why we need to still have tape in this modern era of cloud storage. Our answer is that we'll happily remove their data from future tape backups, and indeed we'll drop tape completely if they'll agree that we're not liable for any missing data. They shut up. In the old days we backed up each desktop, and, if connected at the time that the backup app ran its sweep, each laptop. Now we just back up the servers and NAS and such. Anything on local systems isn't touched. We do run sweeps to see if someone is putting something locally, and periodically find files, usually porn, mostly boring porn, though one sale guy had some really spectacular stuff. He is no longer with us.
I was just about to point out that the typical NCO uses variations on 'fuck', 'shit', 'cock', and 'cunt' (but especially 'fuck') roughly every second word. Marines and sailors tend towards two of three words. I can recall a long service chief petty officer having a little discussion with a new recruit in which five of six words were from the above list. (The recruit had managed to do the impossible, and had broken a Mk VIII* torpedo. The original Mk VIII entered service in 1927. That's One Nine Two Seven. They are commonly considered to be unbreakable.. except this boy managed. The CPO was... annoyed. The rest of us stood well clear of blast range.) (Note that Mk VIII* torps launched from a British nuke sub sank General Belgrano in 1982, being considered to be way more reliable than newer fish. The Navy never throws anything away. They probably still have cutlasses suitable for arming boarding parties still around.)
Prepare to die, heretic. There is but one true iPope: the almighty iSteve. The iTim is merely his prophet.
Onward, Apple soldiers, marching as to war
With the chair of the iSteve going on before
Jobs, the royal Master, leads against the foe
Forward into battle see His banners go
(Who, me? Unimpressed? Whatever gave you that idea? I was hoping for a 16" MBP to replace my current ancient laptop. I guess my credit card stays in my wallet. And the 16" MBP had better not have strange colours if/when it appears.)
Irrelevant. The list of those who were thoroughly repellant human beings with which I would not go near on a personal level but who were very good at what they did is a long one. Wagner was a thoroughly evil man; he was also an extremely talented composer who wrote some of the greatest works of the late 19th century. We should boycott The Ring Cycle because Wagner was a sick puppy? Ford was a fascist; his methods revolutionized industry in the US and the world. We should boycott anything made by assembly line methods, especially cars, particularly Fords, because Ford was a racist ant-semite? Newton stole credit for other's work, most notably the calculus. We should ignore the laws of motion or gravitation because he was an unscrupulous thieving bastard?
YHes, Stallman has done a lot of work which is of great benefit to a lot of people. And yes, he is not someone I'd willingly associate with. Not after his remarks about 14-year-olds, as noted upthread here. And yes, if I had been contributing money to the FSF, I'd stop doing that. I would not like to have my money contributing to him. The bad outweighs the good, in my opinion. Yours may differ. I would not dream of preventing you from supporting him, just as I would not dream of stopping opera fans from going to see some Wagner. But I'm not supporting him.
Heh. Y'all have never, umm, 'associated', with the right people. One place I worked at, the guys in Stores were _notorious_. One gentleman had what appeared to be company utility poles (it was an electric utility) and company street lights and even company pole-mounted transformer casings in his house. The company fired him and started criminal proceedings. The problem was... they could not prove that any of the items had actually ever been company property; none had any company ID numbers, and, more important, nothing was, officially, missing from Stores. They had to give him his job back. Everyone _knew_ that he was stealing the place blind. Proving it was a whole separate thing.
The most spectacular thing that the pirates in Stores ever did was when 12 new company cars, for very senior management, arrived.. but only ten were checked in and no-one ever saw the other two again. Senior management was Extremely Annoyed(tm).
My department was sited next door to Stores. The nearest company canteen was at Stores, and we'd sometimes go over there for lunch. We would keep a hand on our wallets when we did...
1. Why would anyone spend the kind of money necessary to buy one of the M1 Macs and then nuke the warranty by erasing the drive and installing a Linux?
2. Related to above... given the limited disk (really SSD) space (256 or 512 GB, expandable to a max of 2 TB very expensively at point of purchase, not expandable afterwards except by using external USB or Thunderbolt drives), is there a way to create a separate Linux partition and install a bootloader of some type so that users could dual-boot Linux and macOS? I rather suspect that Boot Camp ain't gonna work, and it wasn't that fond of Linux on Intel hardware in the first place. At least it wasn't fond of Linux on Intel hardware sometime after Apple started supporting Win 10 in Boot Camp, not in my experience, anyway.
3. Allegedly there will be versions of VMWare and Parallels for Apple Silicon, Real Soon Now. (I'm not holding my breath waiting.) Wouldn't it be better to run a Linux in a VM? That's how I have Mint and Ubuntu running on various Intel Macs right now. Frankly, I got tired of trying to get Boot Camp to work properly with Linux (it has problems with Win 10, but at least Apple says they're fixing those, they're ignoring Linux in Boot Camp completely, so far as I can tell. Corrections welcome. Not holding my breath waiting for those, either.) and just lit up a VM. I did the same for Win 10. Dual booting is annoying, VMs are slower but more efficient unless I need the full power of the machine... and if I need the full power of the machine to do something macOS can't or won't do, getting a non-Apple system, usually by buying parts and building it myself for my personal use or speccing out a serious business system from a serious vendor (that is, not HP or Dell) for the office, would be more efficient. I'm currently typing this on a hand-built Win 10 system, which started as a Win 7 system in 2012. It was fairly powerful in 2012 but is starting to show its age and will be replaced by a new build system some time this year.
4. What will they do when Apple changes the (undocumented) boot system, which I'm absolutely certain they will? I'll put up serious money that there will soon be a M2 or some other evolution of the M1, and that things will change re booting the new system.
MS did exactly that, at least three times over the last 20 years. They first screwed things up with XP. That was back when they went totally into deepest cloud-coocooland; you see, that big hunk of metal and plastic on the desk isn't the printer, it's the print device. The printer is the software. Really. The printer is independent of the print device; in theory, you can take a spooled print job from one print system and copy it to another, and it'll print. If the first print system had a greyscale print device, you might even be able to get colour if the second is a colour print device. (Good luck actually getting that to happen...) They did this with Won XP, then rebuilt stuff for Vista; that's why a bunch of print devices stopped working with Vista. I had a nice little HP inkjet which worked with XP and Mac OS X Leopard and died on impact with Vista and Snow Leopard. They fiddled some more with Win 10; some older inkjets died with Win10. The printer vendors (HP, the bastards) simply said that certain older printers were no longer supported. The HP printer which got broken by Vista was then less than two years old. It was replaced by a Brother inkjet, because I knew that my Brother laser which had worked with XP and Leopard still worked with Vista and Snow Leopard. Thje Brother laser is still working with Win 10 and Catalina, my Macs can't run Big Sur...
1 Many (most? all?) modern radar-guided air-to-air and surface-to-air missiles have a home-on-jam mode. This tends to make the life of an airborne jamming system exciting, but short. Have the civilian aircraft, or the air traffic controllers, have a word with the local military. If said military aren't the ones doing the jamming, they may elect to have a SHOOTEX. If they are the ones doing the jamming, then... oops.
2 There are dedicated anti-radiation missiles, such as HARM and ALARM. Where the AAMs and SAMs primarily hunt airborne targets, ARMs primarily hunt surface targets. HARMs are fast enough to go for air targets, too. They specifically hunt emitters. Including jammers.
3 GPS systems are _supposed_ to detect GPS emitters. Just include some extra logic in the seeker head avionics. "IF emitter is NOT in orbit AND IF emitter is stronger than cell phone THEN set collision course AND send 'Banzai!' over voice comms frequencies." (Other available words and phrases to replace 'Banzai' include 'Hell waits for thee' and 'God send the right'.)
I had been about to replace my old iPhone SE this weekend, but my main reason for doing so is that after 5 years the battery is not in the best of conditions. 'Battery Health' shows 86%. It still works, but no longer can handle serious use without getting dangerously low on power by the end of a day. (When new, I could get one and a half to two days out of a charge, three if I was conservative.) It seems that a nice new iPhone 12 would deliver similar performance... which makes me wonder how it'll behave when _it_ is five years old.
Yo! Apple! There's a problem here...
I may investigate one of those battery pack things. Or I may just live with the SE until the iPhone 13, with, one hopes, a bigger, better battery, shows up. It's not as if my area is overburdened with 5G signal at the current time, so the battery issue won't, probably, be that big a deal... except when I _am_ near a 5G tower and need the speed, whereupon the battery will drain at max rate knots. Probably when I can't stop to charge it.
I find the depth of the Apple hate to be most interesting, At time of posting, 13 downvotes to the post I'm replying to... and not one person addresses the central point: there were under 30,000 infections, out of an unknown number of million possible targets. Recall that there were variants vor Intel-powered Macs as well as the M1 variant. This malware attack is barely a ripple in a teacup, but some posters are gloating tover the Apple fail. Frtankly, this kind of thing is why I have long ceased to take anything posted on El Reg about Apple, especially but not limited to anything posted by commentards, seriously.
Unleash the downvotes. It will merely confirm what I say. Especially if commentards continue to not address the central point.
Err... no. Safari has its problems, but is simply vasly superior to MSIE and Edge. Recall that there used to be a version of MSIE for Mac... which died at v5.something, a Very Long Time Ago, in part because the primitive version of Safari at that time was better than MSIE. (Web browsers available for Mac at the time included MSIE, Safari, Firefox, and OmniWeb; OW was better than the others, but also was, allegedly, payware if you used it past a certain date. Or something, it's been a while and once I discovered that they wanted cash I dumped it into the Trash. Irt was better, but not that much better. Netscape Navigator may still have been around as well.) I used mostly Firefox on Macs for years, then found myself using Safari more and more and it's now my main browser on Macs. Firefox remains my main browser on Windows and Linux.
Please, if you would, detail the 'rubbish'. And why you think that it's 'rubbish'. Perhaps I'm doing something wrong and simply haven't noticed.
Racist... sorta.He thought that there three tiers of humanity: Englishmen, other Britons and members of the Empire and Commonwealth (in that order...) and everybody else. A black or Indian who was from the Empire was obviously superior to one of those lesser folks without the law from outside of the Empire and Commonwealth. And that especially included Frenchmen and Americans, save for those sufficiently enlightened as to join the Empire. Admittedly, black/Indian Empire subjects were at the bottom of the heap of Empire subjects, but they were still better than anyone from elsewhere.
1 I last set foot in the UK in 1977. I have been an American citizen for literal decades now.
2 damn few Americans 'defended' Britain in WWII. There were a few volunteers, mostly in the RAF, and some serving naval personnel, notably 'observers' in maritime patrol aircraft (the first Navy Cross of the war was awarded to a USN officer serving as an 'observer' in an RAF long-range patrol aircraft which had a bit of an argument with a U-boat; the pilot and co-pilot were among the casualties, the 'observer' finished the attack, sank the u-boat, and brought the aircraft home, desapite being wounded himself) and the crews of USN ships on Armed Neutrality Patrol (USS Rueben James was sunk by a u-boat while on ANP off Iceland in September 1941; she was neither the first nor the last USN ship to engage u-boats while on ANP). The majority of the Americans in Britain were there to _attack_ Naziland; the 8th and 9th Army Air Forces, and the Army troops who went across the Channel. That noted bigot, Ernest King, pulled American naval forces (including the largest and most powerful ASW ships in the world, the 'Secretary' class cutters of the USCG) from the North Atlantic because he didn't want American ships to be under British command. He was fine with _Australian_ ships being under _American_ command, which lead directly to HMAS Canberra being sunk due to massive American incompetence; there would be a reason which there have been American ships named 'Canberra'. (Another Australian cruiser was part of the gun line at Suriago Strait; she was NOT the ship which caused the majority of American casualties in that action by raining fire down on an American destroyer, that would have been an American cruiser.)
3 Churchill and Roosevelt concentrated on the Nazis first because:
3a the Nazis were the most dangerous
3b Churchill & Roosevelt were (correctly) afraid of the consequences of leaving mainland Europe to be a private fight between the Nazis and the Soviets. Not least Churchill feared the consequences for morale among the various French, Dutch, Danish, Norwegian, Czech.and Polish units operating under British command; the Czech and Polish aircrews in the RAF were among the most effective, two Polish ASW ships were in the top 5 most effective, behind ships from Frederic John Walker's escort group, on the Atlantic; the Secretary cutters were the biggest ASW ships but not the best. Churchill _really_ didn't want to be seen as abandoning those men's countries.
3c Italy waa also in Europe, concentrating on Europe got a two-fer. (Actually, more, as Hungary, Romania, Finland, and Bulgaria were also Nazi allies; Japan had to be content with Thailand.)
4 no, Australia could not have been lost. Japan lacked the sealift to mount an invasion of Australia, just as they would have had serious problems getting to Hawaii. Japan could have _hurt_ Australia, badly, but actually taking it would have been a fantasy-land scenario right up there with the Nazis getting across the Channel.
5 Britain outlawed the slave trade in the first decade of the 19th century. One of the causes of the War of 1812 was British interference with American shipping attempting to run slaves across the Atlantic. Britain went so far as to declare that slavers were, for the purposes of law at sea, pirates, and subject to the same penalties as pirates when caught by the RN. That is, to be hung by the neck untill deasd, dead, dead. The US objected. Britain said 'come and stop us'.
5a slavery was abolished in British territories starting in 1833; there was to have been a period of 'apprenticeship' for 5 years, but mostly the now ex-slaves departed en masse. This had consequences; in the Caribbean, British planters imported, successively, workers from Madeira and the Azores (didn't work, is a major reason why there are a lot of people with Portuguese and Spanish names in Jamaica and the rest of the English-speaking Caribbean); Syria/Lebanon (didn't work; that's how Eddie Seaga's ancestors got to Jamaica, with major consequences in 20th century politics in the region); from China (didn't work, except to get lots of Overseas Chinese to places they would never have got on their own); and from India (didn't work, just got lots of Indians to Jamaica and especially Trinidad and Guyana; there's a reason why the West Indies cricket team had men with names like 'Ramadeen' and 'Kanhai' ) and finally to try to make things difficult for the ex-slaves and their descendants (didn't work; see further Paul Bogle and the Morant Bay Rebellion, and Alexander Bustamante and Norman Manley and the trades union movements. There would be a reason why politics in the region is dominated by parties which grew out of unions. The only thing more bolshie than a Jamaican cane cutter is a Guyanese cane cutter...) And, oh, in southern Africa the British abolition of slavery directly caused the Great Trek when the Boers went north to escape British tyranny and to keep their slaves. Meanwhile, the US fought a civil war to end slavery... and ton this day there are some who _still_ carry the battle ensign of the Army of Northern Virginia. Including idiots among those who stormed the Capitol building. (And they're doubly or even triply idiots; the actual ensign was _never_ the flag of the Confederacy, and was _square_, not rectangular. The idiots can't even get _that_ right.)
Seriously, you need to conduct a little research.
1 The war loans were, mostly, paid back. The UK went to a great deal of trouble to pay them back.
2 The US sent 50 overage, WWI-vintage, destroyers to the UK in return for bases on British territory. These bases included the locations of what are now the international airports in Trinidad (Piarco; there's a _reason_ why the main highway from Port of Spain to Piarco is the _Churchill-Roosevelt_ Highway); Barbados (Grantly Adams); St Lucia (Hewanorra); and probably others, I've only gone to those three, plus Vernam Field in Jamaica, now a motor vehicle raceway. The most famous of the ex-American destroyers was HMS Campleton, expended blowing up the Normandie Docks during Operation Chariot, the Greatest Raid of All. (5 VCs were awarded...)
3 Das Reich wasn't coming across the Channel. Panzers can't swim, and they didn't have anything even barely resembling the sealift required for an invasion.
4 You _do_ know that two of the five beaches at Normandy in 1944 were taken by British forces and a third by Canadians, don't you? Unlike the Nazis, the British Commonwealth and Empire _did_ have the sealift to mount an invasion.
5 if the US isn't in the war, that means that the Japanese backed off... which means that the Australians, the Indians, the New Zealanders, and all the rest of the Empire are available to go after Naziland. Instead of two American beaches, there would probably have been an Australian and an Indian beach, with the Kiwis tagging along with the Aussies.
Even the president can't authorize the use of nukes by himself, unless there is an emergency. The Air Force general in command of the bombers (and it would have to be bombers, ICBMs and SLBMs would have to be retargeted and in any case unscheduled missile launches would make the Russians and Chinese very nervous) would want the go order authorized by at least one other member of National Command Authority. The guys who actually fly the bombers would be looking for Emergency War Orders and after events dating back to the days of Bill Clinton will not be dropping anything anywhere, especially on American territory, without explicit, direct, orders... and even then they'd wonder why an AC-130 or some F-16s didn't go in instead.
Not NORAD. NORAD's the defense guys. They have no links to the subs, the bombers, or the land-based missiles, despite what you might have seen in Holyweird pieces of fluff like War Games. NORAD's only comment would be. to say that there weren't any inbounds detected at this time.
It used to be that if the headquarters of SAC, in Omaha, Nebraska, got removed from the command network, launch authority would go to whoever had duty as Alice in the Looking Glass aircraft, but Alice is grounded now that there are no more Looking Glass aircraft; instead. launch command authority goes to the US Navy's TACAMO ('TAke Charge And Move Out') aircraft of which one is over the Atlantic and one over the Pacific at all times; another bit of Holyweird fluff, By Dawn's Early Light, was set in the days when Looking Glass still flew. James Earl Jones was Alice, Martin Landau was the president, and the Russians were obnoxious. In the absence of inbound vampires (hostile missiles are 'vampires' in USN-speak) the TACAMOs will probably request authorization before giving the order to launch, and no one man, not even the president, can authorize a launch by himself unless there's an emergency, where 'emergency' is someone at the National Military Command Center in Washington saying something like "Vampire, vampire, many vampires inbound, confidence is high" and NORAD confirming that, TACAMO won't give the go order without at least two members of National Command Authority saying so. The Prez is just one. The Veep is another, as is the SecDef, the SecState, and either the chairman or all, I can't remember which and can't be arsed to look it up, of the Joint Chiefs. Does anyone actually think that any of them would go with the Prez on this? And this is the one thing that he _can't_ just order, even as commander in chief. And if he just fires the Joint Chiefs, etc, when they won't back him, TACAMO isn't going to take orders from substitutes when there's no emergency. He could fire the guys in the TACAMO aircraft, but they'd just return to base, and their reliefs would also just sit on their hands. What's he going to do, fire the entire USN? The land-based missiles, bombers, and subs will sit unless they get Emergency War Orders from a valid, authorized, source: TACAMO or NMCC or a valid substitute. What is likely toi happen is that someone at NMCC calls the Veep and asks about the 25th Amendment while someone else calls the Marines at 8th and I in DC and a Marine battalion goes and sits on DJT until President-for-less-than-two-weeks Pence (or, if Pence is fired, Pelosi...) tells them to let him up.
She does such a cracking good job that she needs a promotion. No longer should she be a mere Baroness. No, she should be a _Duchess_. I do believe that the Duke of York is currently between engagements. They deserve each other. And then the newly hitched pair should be sent to be co-Governors of the Falklands.
Should Germany, for example, fire up anti-trust, the sonic boom you hear would be Google switching off Google.de. Users inside Germany could, I suppose, use Google.com, but specifically German items may be buried in the search. Similarly, if France, or, indeed, the entire EU, attempted to fire up anti-trust, I see Google simply pulling the plug in France/the EU. It's not as if they can't make billions from the entire rest of the planet.
Personally, I use Firefox, not Chrome, and DuckDuckGo, not Google search. I no longer have Gmail, mostly due to shenanigans Google pulled. (They wanted me to use their 'secure' app. I declined, and used Apple Mail on Macs and iDevices, and Outlook on Windows, and attempted Thunderbird on Linux. Google said that they weren't sure that they could verify that I was the person who owned the multiple Gmail accounts in question, all four of them, and locked them down. I had complete backups of all mail and contacts, so I got new email accounts, contacted everyone who had the old contacts, and drove on. I'm not feeling the love for Google.) Google is big. Google is evil. Google can live without newspapers in Germany, Spain, or Australia a lot better than the papers can live without Google.
There's sarcasm, and then there's sarcasm, and then there's _this_. The only reason why Verizon isn't the worst telco in the US is because AT&T exists. The only reason why AT&T isn't the worst telco in the world is because Cable & Wireless exists. (Sorta.) Veriscum is certainly attempting to take both titles, and may yet succeed.
Biting the hand that feeds IT © 1998–2021