Or.....
Just use Open Shell!
56 publicly visible posts • joined 14 Jun 2007
A friend of mine's uncle has a legal storage business - it's very profitable because law firms store boxes of case files with him and these need to be kept for decades - so his business only grows and grows - I see MS removing POP3 access WHILST selling one of the main email space providers via Ms365 AND selling the main corporate email client that using IMAP keeps emails with the email space provider as a very similar and lucrative business model for them - surely the competition regulator should look into this?!
I'm afraid you and I appear to be the lone voice of reason here - I know Youtube creators who rely on ad income to fund their work and anyone viewing their content with an adblocker installed is ultimately endangering that - it's quite simple - if you visit someone's site, please abide by their rules eg for YouTube watch ads in return for viewing content - if you don't like ads then don't use the site, what gives you the right to think you can override their T&C's?! don't instead install a technical solution and start spouting concerns about "privacy" or CPU cycles when really you just don't want the minor inconvenience of sitting through adverts - if EVERYONE had an adblocker today half the Internet would disappear and what exactly would you replace it with??? Paywalls?! How on earth is that better?
I'm originally from the channel islands and have many friends who work in industries based on LVCR.
Yes it is a loophole but the main problem is that they are ONLY applying this restriction to the channel islands - almost borderline racism and also quite stupid -> the companies will just move their operations to other countries e.g. Hong Kong or Switzerland and continue to exploit the loophole but now from places that DON'T put buy from UK suppliers - don't forget 95% of the islands' internally consumed imports come from the UK - i imagine it is the other way round with Hong Kong!
2 points always interest me about FOSS though...
1. what percentage of programmers contributing in their spare time have full time paid jobs in firms selling proprietary/closed software? i.e. if all software became FOSS tomorrow would the economic model be self-sustaining?
2. there now seems to be a large degree of awareness in the business community about "free software" HOWEVER this has the trickle down effect that they then translate this to mean support and other professional time based fee should be on a lower rate than for traditional systems! i.e. the rather illogical "this software is free, why are you charging me to put it on my computer argument?"