Clearly you missed the bit about "believes" in the post you were replying to and the Hansard quotes further up.
Posts by Ken Hagan
8814 publicly visible posts • joined 14 Jun 2007
Page:
- 1
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 11
- 12
- 13
- 14
- 15
- 16
- 17
- 18
- 19
- 20
- 21
- 22
- 23
- 24
- 25
- 26
- 27
- 28
- 29
- 30
- 31
- 32
- 33
- 34
- 35
- 36
- 37
- 38
- 39
- 40
- 41
- 42
- 43
- 44
- 45
- 46
- 47
- 48
- 49
- 50
- 51
- 52
- 53
- 54
- 55
- 56
- 57
- 58
- 59
- 60
- 61
- 62
- 63
- 64
- 65
- 66
- 67
- 68
- 69
- 70
- 71
- 72
- 73
- 74
- 75
- 76
- 77
- 78
- 79
- 80
- 81
- 82
- 83
- 84
- 85
- 86
- 87
- 88
- 89
- 90
- 91
- 92
- 93
- 94
- 95
- 96
- 97
- 98
- 99
- 100
- 101
- 102
- 103
- 104
- 105
- 106
- 107
- 108
- 109
- 110
- 111
- 112
- 113
- 114
- 115
- 116
- 117
- 118
- 119
- 120
- 121
- 122
- 123
- 124
- 125
- 126
- 127
- 128
- 129
- 130
- 131
- 132
- 133
- 134
- 135
- 136
- 137
- 138
- 139
- 140
- 141
- 142
- 143
- 144
- 145
- 146
- 147
- 148
- 149
- 150
- 151
- 152
- 153
- 154
- 155
- 156
- 157
- 158
- 159
- 160
- 161
- 162
- 163
- 164
- 165
- 166
- 167
- 168
- 169
- 170
- 171
- 172
- 173
- 174
- 175
- 176
- 177
- Next →
The UK government isn't spending much taxpayer cash on X
Were telcos tipped off to *that* ancient Telnet bug? Cyber pros say the signs stack up
In the current geopolitical climate, I think "shot down" is more likely to apply to an easily discoverable and easily hacked piece of infrastructure in a country you don't like.
So, while not disputing your many years of experience working with such systems, I'm left wondering whether this is still the case in 2026.
Re: Define use.
"nmap -sV -p 23 --script banner <my whole subnet>"
That would only pick up servers facing the LAN. That's quite different from running a telnet server that accepts connections from the WAN. (There are roughly a million times fewer people in a position to exploit it, for one thing.)
Microsoft rolls out Windows 11 26H1, but you can't have it
Notepad's new Markdown powers served with a side of remote code execution
Re: the app's core ethos as a lightweight, fast, no-frills program…
So much so that MS should just have added support for UNIX-style line breaks to the standard edit control and let Notepad inherit that.
But what they are more likely to do now is add Coprolite support to that control and revert to the original Notepad implementation. Sigh...
Taiwan tells Uncle Sam its chip ecosystem ain't going anywhere
Microsoft boffins figured out how to break LLM safety guardrails with one simple prompt
Re: Again, is this "news"
"And as soon as you expect an AI to think for itself, to step outside its training data, or to understand the over-arching theme of some data that's not explicitly referenced in its training... it fails to do so. Because it's simply not capable of doing anything that isn't a simple statistical return value from its training data."
This appears to be exactly the case. A friend of mine recently asked an AI for some links to research papers on several subjects. Where research actually existed, the AI was sort of able to summarise it and provide genuine links. In other words, it was able to regurgitate some of its training data. Where no such research exists, it was confidently making shit up and generating URLs to papers that don't exist. I assume all that was statistically similar to the training data, but since the actual research didn't exist, there was no training data to regurgitate, so it just made shit up.
There is absolutely no intelligence here. If you ask a question, it *will* give an answer. If you then ask for references, it *will* provide some. If the references check out then congratulations, you have just used a flaky search engine to find a previously known result. If the refs don't check out, it probably means the answer was made up and isn't true.
Is the flaky search engine a useful thing? Well maybe. Is it worth $600,000,000,000? Ummm, can I get back to you on that?
Linus Torvalds keeps his ‘fingers and toes’ rule by decreeing next Linux will be version 7.0
It's bubble or nothing for Google as search giant looks to plow ~$180B into datacenters this year
1) Um, no. The panels are the same efficiency (at least to start with) so they'll generate just as much waste heat as they would on Earth. What's different is the level of solar irradiation. Also, that irradiation is unfiltered by the atmosphere so I suspect the useful life of each panel will be significantly reduced.
2) I haven't read of any specific proposals for shedding the waste heat. Thermodynamics is a harsh mistress, but maybe Elon is exempt? (Or maybe he likes punishment?)
3) This is probably fair. If we are putting an entire data centre up there, we can probably get the surface area to volume ration down to a level where the lead shielding is proportionately low.
4) Call me skeptical, but except for satellites in exactly the same orbit, following each other around, the problem of pointing your transmitter at a 17,000mph target sounds quite challenging.
Three clues that your LLM may be poisoned with a sleeper-agent back door
Amazon can't build AI capacity fast enough, throws another $200B at the problem
Re: *Pop* Go The Weasels
Exactly. This sounds like Amazon are just a little downstream of nVidia. They are spending squillions but as long as there is someone else downstream of them buying capacity, Amazon aren't (necessarily*) the mugs here.
(* Of course, these huge companies have divisions and it is possible, even likely, that one of the mugs is a different division of Amazon.)
Supermarket sorry after facial recognition alert flags right criminal, wrong customer
Re: Ban it
I'm pretty sure that your village store has for centuries been using facial recognition tech to ban customers. All the cameras do is scale it up to supermarket scale.
Of course, having recognised someone you do have to kick out that person rather than the one following and you do have to be willing to back up your ban criteria in court if challenged. But that's true in the village store, too.
Re: Riddle me this
Sounds like an easy game to win. Look up the ownership at Companies House. If it's a single-use company, don't give them the contract. If they aren't even registered at CH, don't give them the contract. If it's Fujitsu, don't give them the contract.
(That third rule is just me engaging in defensive programming, btw.)
Satya Nadella decides Microsoft needs an engineering quality czar
GitHub ponders kill switch for pull requests to stop AI slop
Broadcom 'bulldozes' VMware cloud partners as March deadline looms
Re: Why am I ashamed of my tribe ?
"The profits for the site is measured in millions per day, which makes both the cost of FT and the whole VMware licensing a rounding error."
I guess El Reg is a funny place, then. There would appear to be a number of such people in this forum in a similar position but the world is finite so I wonder if this is representative of the wider population. If Broadcom want to discard everyone else, that's their choice (but remember that it is in the nature of IT that the smaller cheaper stuff gets better so they may be locking out their own future) but surely there are lots of people who should just be migrating now?
Re: Why am I ashamed of my tribe ?
"some business applications are only certified to run on VMware"
We'll, either you have a serious vendor lock-in problem there or you should send an email to those vendors explaining that the additional costs of VMware will henceforth be added to every single quote they offer you in future and that you are looking for an alternative because you aren't made of money.
I'm not saying you have to dump them now. That would be unrealistic. You should, however, put them on notice. How hard can it be for them to test on a few other platforms?
VirtualBox isn't really owned by Oracle, though. The basic product is FOSS and you don't need the Extension Pack that has the offensive licence.
Still, the OP mentioned "on Linux" and KVM is a reasonable choice there. You might choose VBox if you had to support similar VMs on a range of hosts, I suppose. (For a developer, the use-case of "try this VM on that host" is, perhaps, more common than for the cloud providers who are the unhappy folk in the original article.)
VS Code for Linux may be secretly hoarding trashed files
Next-gen nuclear reactors safe enough to skip full environmental reviews, says Trump admin
Microsoft's Sinofsky saw Surface fail coming – then hit up Epstein for advice on exit
Autonomous cars, drones cheerfully obey prompt injection by road sign
Re: Teenage boys will be salivating...
My car has just my eyes. If you use some of that Really Black paint, so that my headlights aren't reflected, then on a dark night I might be fooled.
To my knowledge, nobody has tried these kinds of adversarial attacks on human drivers. Perhaps we should, before setting an unrealistic bar for self-driving vehicles.
Agents gone wild! Companies give untrustworthy bots keys to the kingdom
Birmingham City Council's Oracle ERP fiasco now £144M and still not working
How one developer used Claude to build a memory-safe extension of C
Re-inventing programming
"Now we not only have to be ourselves clear, but we have to communicate it clearly to an LLM."
Hmm. If only you had some king of special-purpose language designed for passing precisely specified requirements to a machine...
Of course, I suppose you'd need specially-trained people who knew how to use that language.
Concorde at 50: Twice the speed of sound, twice the economic trouble
Surrender as a service: Microsoft unlocks BitLocker for feds
Oracle, Michael Dell, named as investors in JV that will run TikTok's US operations
Ancient telnet bug happily hands out root to attackers
Re: Who still uses environment variables?
I think that's a little unfair. If the configuration is the sort of thing that could be constrained and verified, it is no worse than any other form of IPC. The problem here is "not validating user input" and not the route by which that input has arrived.
Anthropic CEO: Selling H200s to China is like giving nukes to North Korea
"The US currently leads in advanced semiconductor technology and export controls capitalize on the trend of computing power doubling every two years, so while US chip technology continues advancing, China's progress is slowed,"
Umm, the hardware is made in Taiwan using Dutch kit. It looks like whoever said this knows Jack Shit about the industry.
UK prime minister stares down barrel of ban on social media for kids
Re: Another brick in the wall
"I support banning politicians from social media."
I support banning government from social media.
Yes, people should be kept informed of what is happening, but using a medium that started with "dumb everything down and squeeze it into a hundred or so characters" (and hasn't evolved much since) is a really terrible idea.
UK backtracks on digital ID requirement for right to work
Ofcom keeps X under the microscope despite Grok 'nudify' fix
"Turns out it was a switch"
Maybe.
So someone outside the UK asks Grok to create an image. Grok determines that the image would conflict with UK law. Grok generates the image anyway and (as is its wont) slaps it on X for public view. Is that image visible in the UK?
If so, the switch fails to address most of the complaints from campaigners.
If not, what if someone reposts it, which is obviously pretty straightforward for the person who generated it if they want to be a dick about it. Is it visible now?
If so, this also fails to address most of the complaints.
If not, it is rather more than a switch, since they've apparently wired X to support a "do not show to users in XYZ" feature and it is transitive.
Don’t bother with the retailer’s website, says Google: Gemini can shop for you
Boffins probe commercial AI models, find an entire Harry Potter book
OpenAI putting bandaids on bandaids as prompt injection problems keep festering
Re: Idiots
Nobody is suggesting that they could do better. The nay-sayers are merely pointing out that the better the AI becomes at following instructions, the easier it becomes to trick it into doing something it shouldn't.
This is similar to a child who has never been exposed to bad people. It will learn. It will get better. But until it learns about Good and Evil, it would be stupid to put it in charge of anything important or to expose it to random members of the human race.
The current approach to AI involves adding guardrails. That is, adding traditional algorithmic code to make it sensible. We have 60-plus years of experience that tells us you can't create "sense" with a lot of if-statements. The failure of that approach is why modern AIs don't try to work that way. So we are trying to create guardrails with an approach that has 60 years of failure behind it.
How fucking stupid is that?
UK regulators swarm X after Grok generated nudes from photos
Re: Storm in a teacup
"No, we charge the perpetrator."
I think the point is that many people consider Grok's makers to be an accessory to that perpetrator.
How hard is it for Grok to identify nude pictures? How hard for it to refuse to process, let alone generate, them? How much of a loss of useful function would that be? Why do other providers seem not to have the same problem?
Re: Let's just become less prudish
It's an interesting suggestion but for anyone over the age of 20 it is probably too late to change how their subconscious feels about nudity.
Also, there are plenty of really quite good looking under-20s who still fret about their appearance, fully clothed. This isn't a rational thing. Everyone around them says "Relax. You look great.". It doesn't help. Do you really think you can persuade such people that they don't need to worry about others circulating nude pics?
Page:
- 1
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 11
- 12
- 13
- 14
- 15
- 16
- 17
- 18
- 19
- 20
- 21
- 22
- 23
- 24
- 25
- 26
- 27
- 28
- 29
- 30
- 31
- 32
- 33
- 34
- 35
- 36
- 37
- 38
- 39
- 40
- 41
- 42
- 43
- 44
- 45
- 46
- 47
- 48
- 49
- 50
- 51
- 52
- 53
- 54
- 55
- 56
- 57
- 58
- 59
- 60
- 61
- 62
- 63
- 64
- 65
- 66
- 67
- 68
- 69
- 70
- 71
- 72
- 73
- 74
- 75
- 76
- 77
- 78
- 79
- 80
- 81
- 82
- 83
- 84
- 85
- 86
- 87
- 88
- 89
- 90
- 91
- 92
- 93
- 94
- 95
- 96
- 97
- 98
- 99
- 100
- 101
- 102
- 103
- 104
- 105
- 106
- 107
- 108
- 109
- 110
- 111
- 112
- 113
- 114
- 115
- 116
- 117
- 118
- 119
- 120
- 121
- 122
- 123
- 124
- 125
- 126
- 127
- 128
- 129
- 130
- 131
- 132
- 133
- 134
- 135
- 136
- 137
- 138
- 139
- 140
- 141
- 142
- 143
- 144
- 145
- 146
- 147
- 148
- 149
- 150
- 151
- 152
- 153
- 154
- 155
- 156
- 157
- 158
- 159
- 160
- 161
- 162
- 163
- 164
- 165
- 166
- 167
- 168
- 169
- 170
- 171
- 172
- 173
- 174
- 175
- 176
- 177
- Next →