Re: Data for sale?
As with pretty much every other NHS project given 12 months it will fail and disappear in to a black hole.
216 publicly visible posts • joined 11 Aug 2011
You've copied my house design.... how? By putting round corners on it!
Its great when two tech giants can go head to head over the style of a device, Apple are just whining because the only thing that does actually make there phone recognizable is its shape, the actual features aren't the selling point for them and never will be!
The fact that Apple are now suffering at the hands of patent trolls just adds to the fun, they're about to get their ass dragged through court over face time, siri and various other ip infringements. They seem to be getting more like MS, get a product we can sell no matter what the cost or method and throw money at any problems later once we already sold loads of them.
Unfortunately a lot of people who are unemployed look at the jobs out there as boring and mundane rather than the means to an end. You cant progress or better yet expect to be earning 30k+ without doing some of the shit jobs along the way. I started out picking up rubbish on the local market at 16, not a great job but it still paid. How many 16 year old's would do that now?
I've on occasion sent job details to friends who are supposedly looking for jobs and quite often get a response back of 'Nah I don't want to do that' and yet a few conversations later they'll vent anger at being stuck on benefits.
Somebody mentioned earlier in the thread, that the unemployed mass are not the benefit robbers I think they are...... Unfortunately that's also down to where you live, the road I live on has two working families, a few that work cash in hand and defraud the benefit system whilst the remaining sit on their ass outside each others house getting pissed all day.
No one seems to be asking the question about the relationship between 'there aren't enough jobs' and G4S failing to fill some 30,000 jobs!!! I would be really interested to see how many people actually applied for jobs with them, if it outstripped the figure fair enough.... if it didn't then that's worrying.
When will Apple realize that there is more to selling products than how it looks.....
If your whole case is about whether you lost sales because somebody designed a product that looks the same then I would be seriously concerned about the need to have 'technical' engineers being paid thousands of pounds and yet admitting to breakdown other peoples phones to see how they antenna work.
Surely if your product is so good people would be saying well the samsung looks the same but the iPhone has this and that, or vice verse. It should be about which has the best tech not which looks good in your pocket!
I wonder if anyone has also considered the effect this would have on the gov's new snooping attempts, we'll have MI5 and MI6 viewing broadcast footage just in case the terrorists and pedo's starting embedding subliminal messages or dodgy content in tv channels....
My somewhat limited understanding of it is.....
The device requests assistance from the mobile provider to locate nearby sat positions, it then uses this data to help get a fix quicker.
So on to the hack....
In the event your connected to a malicious wireless network or someone can hack your phone over the wifi then they could override the settings provided by the mobile provider and replace them with there own. I would assume since they stated it remains in effect afterwards there must be some mechanism which then prevents the device from either asking the network for settings and again or simply prevents the settings from being update.
Were not selling enough, put up the prices to cover the gap, we sell even less, business no longer viable.
Were not making enough, put up the prices, demand drops were making too many, business no longer viable
And the gov constantly reinforce this stupid mindset.......
Business are closing, put up the taxes, more business close.
Not enough jobs, more people need benefits, put up the taxes, more businesses close, less jobs.
Cigarettes, less people are smoking, we need the money put the tax up.
Beer, people aren't spending out, we need the money, sting the supermarket shoppers.
"And then get off your fucking high-horse arses & fucking vote"
I'll vote when there is someone worth voting for but by that time I will probably be collecting my pension if there is actually one for me to collect!
"learn how politics really works"
It doesn't work for the public, it works for the people in power, and it works to keep them in power no matter how shit they are!
hate wireless
I started out with wireless all over my home a few years ago which was great but I've slowly noticed an increase in the number of networks within range of mine and ever decreasing performance of my own. I've now wired the house instead for the bulk of devices and its pretty much only visitors that use the wireless and occasionally my kids on their net books.
On another note I think most of the sales staff that try to sell you wireless equipment should be given a slap, I recently saw a young probably commissioned based sales idiot flogging an old couple wireless N because its faster, no mention of the fact that they would still be limited by internet speed, would need wireless N adapters or compatible hardware etc etc. I'll give you a hint which shop...... Begins with a P, its got a C in it and World and they screwed that couple out of nearly £150
"we are not proposing this law on the grounds that it will provide 100 per cent coverage of the communications data in this country"
Yep and you can guarantee the missing per cent will be the important terrorist communications...... or at least that will be the defending argument when there is an incident they failed to detect and they have to justify the ridiculous amounts of money that will be spent.
I think patents should be maintained in some form but it should be down to the actual development cost since that's what they were intended for.
Too many companies now seem to think they can patent even the slightest development (especially in software) as was the case with Apple and slide to unlock\gesture to unlock, its not a ground breaking innovation its been around since the first sliding bolt, its more a case of patent it anyway then we can use it as ammunition against someone else later.
Most of these recent patent battles are causing harm to the industry and giving creativity a back seat...... its no longer buy our product cause its the best, its buy our products because we've managed to ban the rest.
The US will get him anyway if they really want him, a lot of this hype is just about buying time and making himself visible so they cant just snatch him off the street.
When you break apart the situation it comes to down to a few simple points, questions and options which are:
A) Assange hasn't done anything wrong at all
B) Assange did rape\molest\abuse (delete appropriately) the two women
C) Assange was setup by the two women because each of them found out about the other
D) Assange was setup by the two women as part of a honeypot trap
As far getting him from Sweden, at the moment the Swedish public aren't in uproar about an already one sided extradition treaty with the US. If the request came into the UK gov most of the public would go ballistic that we cant extradite terrorists because of their human rights etc but the US can have anyone they like from our shores who they think is a terrorist. When you add the fact the US would want to try him for treason which is punishable by death then the Human Rights issues could get bigger.
Lol Scorchio!! has it wrong again\still, if i could be bothered I would run through all the posts from the last thread on this:
http://forums.theregister.co.uk/forum/1/2012/06/19/assange_ecuadorian_embassy/
The statement which you keep mentioning: "The Swedes want to question him prior to officially charging him which is their legal procedure. He fled their jurisdiction prior to being brought in for this questioning and eventual arrest."
Re: typical US law extends to everything
Is totally wrong.....
Not sure what you've been smoking but if you do a little bit more research, you would actually find the initial warrant\accusations (not a Euro warrant) of rape was dismissed by Eva Finne which would potentially would have carried a custodial sentence and only the minor "annoyance" accusation remains.
It was then at the beginning of September that a new warrant (again not a euro warrant) was issued for both offenses again during which time assange was also undertaking a hearing for a Swedish work permit and was still in the country.
On Sept 15th he was given permission to leave the country following a 5week stay to answer the allegations made against him (the prosecutions own timeline\evidence supports this)
November 28th Swedish court issued the ECW followed shortly after by an Interpol red flag, these were both issues after he had already left the country and initially answered questions.
The Swedes want to question him prior to officially charging him which is their legal procedure. He fled their jurisdiction prior to being brought in for this questioning and eventual arrest.
Not sure what you've been smoking but if you do a little bit more research, you would actually find the initial warrant\accusations (not a Euro warrant) of rape was dismissed by Eva Finne which would potentially would have carried a custodial sentence and only the minor "annoyance" accusation remains.
It was then at the beginning of September that a new warrant (again not a euro warrant) was issued for both offenses again during which time assange was also undertaking a hearing for a Swedish work permit and was still in the country.
On Sept 15th he was given permission to leave the country following a 5week stay to answer the allegations made against him (the prosecutions own timeline\evidence supports this)
November 28th Swedish court issued the ECW followed shortly after by an Interpol red flag, these were both issues after he had already left the country and initially answered questions.
I've already cited a number of examples, if you would like to provide your evidence to contradict and prove them incorrect then please feel free to do so.
But to add some more and show just how openly the US interprets its own laws.
Libyan Intel documents showing direct links to CIA renditions supported by Diplomatic cables released by Wiki leaks
Water boarding of suspects which is deemed as torture under Human Rights acts to which they are signatories.
US drone attacks which have injured as many civilians as suspected terrorists, of course these cant be confirmed as terrorists since none have ever been put through a legal system. Incidentally if they are suspects and the US obviously knows there location why don't they extradite them rather than summary execution on presidential order.
Mega upload - removal of evidence without permission of the NZ gov, there justification the physical media is the evidence not data.... in that case since Manning only took the information and not the physical device then he cant have taken any evidence.
Hmm, first proof.....
Raid against the Piratebay for copyright infringement, although not illegal in Sweden the US DOJ pressured Sweden into it:
A letter titled "Re: The Pirate Bay" from the Motion Picture Association of America (MPAA) to Dan Eliasson, State Secretary at the Swedish Ministry of Justice, was dated two months before the raid and hinted at trade reprisals.
As for terms of the warrant, they only apply whilst the warrant is in effect. Once the warrant has been executed and consider complete there would be nothing to stop the US submitting a request to the Swedish government to have him arrested on US based charges as long as they released him, didn't directly transfer him, didn't impede his ability to leave the country (i.e no fly list, confiscate passport etc) prior to re-arresting him then they could extradite him.
Incidentally I do think he's an idiot and i'm not particularly keen on him, but I'm less keen on America.
Everything to do with the Yanks, they are already known to be pressuring the Swedish gov to get their hands on him whether he is charged or not and most recently the Swedish have been rolling over to demands from the US in respect to websites closures, copyright cases, and web based crimes of which most of them aren't actually illegal under Swedish law.
If as is stated by the Swedish\EC warrant the purpose is too question him in relation to possible offenses which as yet he hasn't been charged with then surely that can be done from a police station in the UK under interview condition, incidentally he offered to do this at the Swedish Embassy or Scotland Yard.
Its another case where American law applies to everyone and everything.....
Recent examples:
Christopher Tappin - Conspiring to export missiles from the US... see the the problem with that, he's not a US citizen, not a US business man and technically he was importing them and it was a bunch of US agents that were exporting them. Interesting how the manufacturer are in no way to blame for poor control.
Richard O'Dwyer - Providing links to copyrighted material, no charges bought in the UK but shipped him over to the US
It does seem a bit dodgy really pulling out when the problem has been found and effectively losing your voice on the board.
Question is which would a company prefer being remembered for pulling out and washing their hands of a scandal or staying on board and getting to grips with it.
Hardly gonna market themselves as not safe, but again as a parent my definition of safe and there's differ very widely I should imagine. It still comes down to parents, my daughters is old enough for a faceb account according to their terms and conditions, she isn't old enough for one by mine and when she does get one until she is 16 she wont be using it unsupervised.
It will only catch the stupid and the common criminals, anyone who actually thinks this will help protect national security is a complete Muppet.
One thing to point out, the gov seems to have massive failings when it comes to organising any project involving data.... chances are this will go the same way, spend 2billion and end up with a failure in about 3 years.