Re: struggled with the redesign on the home page
I've sat here wondering how to answer this, as in 18 years here I've never had to justify or explain a comment outside of an obscure pop culture reference.
All I can say is: Why not?
It's one thing to say that knowingly using the word woke out of context annoys people. But it's different to say that I knowingly used it to annoy people. It's a subtle difference. And I guess really the term came to mind because of the comment lock out for an hour and how it brought to mind Sean Dyche's comments on VAR in football. In that respect it is the antithesis of what has gone before. The moment the article goes up the comments section is open for business as per a wonderful and beautiful open internet. Now though, one can't help but feel that it's possible that the comments section is locked like that for fear of some random reason. Fear of the comments going down a certain tonal route for example. When an explanation isn't forthcoming you just create a vacuum really to be filled. It just feels a bit like it's a reaction to an increasingly intense sensibilities and tighter pearl clutching. It doesn't feel so long ago the editor put an article about the comments section and reminding everyone to tone it down. Which brought Sean Dyche to mind which, I guess, was in response to something that could be parallel to this.
So really I am probably wrong in thinking I used it out of context. I think it's used in context, and I think it's correct.
As for being an equal opportunities annoyance, it is what it is and I'm alright with that. I think plenty here (if not all) get really arsey and cuntish with each other if they read something by a total random stranger and spend hours of their time arguing the toss, forgetting the other person on the other end won't have their viewpoint or mind changed the same way as they themselves won't be told. I am pretty certain there are people who will have been pissed off with me for referencing the Fairey Swordfish plane sinking the Bismark as the Sopwith Swordfish and the fact it sunk the Bismark. I didn't make that statement to piss anyone off. I got my plane manufacturers wrong, and at a top level view yeah the Swordfish sunk the boat but really it disabled it allowing the Royal Navy to sink it.
Now the fact remains for me is that you can only please some of the people some of the time. I've been here long enough I've not gone out of my way to fuck anyone off, but I also know genuine mistakes aren't seen as such or I'm misunderstood in a view and that in turn pisses people off. The whole idea of "This is my truth tell me yours" annoys people because it's not in their own echo chamber so you're immediately wrong. There are people who are out and out wrong here who should be called out on it, and thankfully are (looking at you MAGA lickers).
But to answer your question, as succinctly as I can - When the seagulls follow the trawler, it's because they think sardines will be thrown into the sea,
Fin.