This would eliminate its usefulness in education settings too. Can't be having teacher laptops deciding to reboot in the middle of a lesson.
Being able to set a maintenance window at a minimum is a necessity.
1653 publicly visible posts • joined 25 Jul 2011
Considering the speed we can transmit data through copper has increased year on year for decades, I think this point is key here. Copper itself hasn't massively changed, but the tech to utilise it properly has. Eg. compare USB 1 to USB 3.1. Massive increase in capability, but it is still just a copper wire.
Not sure the Chinese government have a good grasp on what socialism is? Socialism is itself not authoritarian and dictatorial. Having criticism of the government isn't not in itself anti-socialist.
But then, China isn't particularly bothered with actually following socialist values are they? They appear to be far closer to the Animal Farm version of communism - everyone is equal but some are more equal than others.
The USA imported 26.3m metric tonnes of steel in 2019, and exported 7.1m metric tonnes.
So, yes, steel can very easily be shipped.
Not to mention, China is the world's largest steel maker, followed by India, Japan, USA, Russia, S Korea, Turkey, Germany etc...
Raw materials are not going to be the reason SpaceX stays in the USA. They are a relatively minor part of the cost of flying their rockets.
The FAA is also aware that it is an issue of competing on a world stage too. If the USA behaves in a way that discourages private space port operations, then companies are more likely to move to other countries. Plenty of countries would love that investment.
So, realistically, these mitigations are part of the process of ensuring things stay in the USA as well. They're certainly not to make it too onerous to implement.
Sure, spending keeps going up.
You know what also keeps going up? Population and inflation. If you measure federal govt spending against GDP, it has been fairly level since 1952 in the USA... State and local spending though? They've been increasing.
The UK, as a comparison, has been rather more all over the place, but if you draw a line through it (excluding covid years, but including financial crash, and the 70s version of the financial crash), it is fairly flat too. Averaging around 40%.
Less government has been tried. It doesn't work. Less government means more scams, criminals and frauds. It means more poor quality goods coming to market due to less regulation. It means more people getting sick or hurt etc...
We have the amount of government we have today in reaction to problems. Politicians didn't just wake up one day and decide "lets regulate XYZ market for no reason".
The creation of China was in fact done via attacking and conquering neighbours. Qin Shi Huang conquered neighbours, gave himself the title "Huangdi" of the Qin - the start of the imperial state of China.
More recently, they have annexed Tibet, Aksai Chin, the Paracel Islands, etc... Not to mention their current claims to Taiwan.
Your analogy doesn't hold up.
China is a single country - the only way for it to expand its borders is taking over other countries.
NATO, on the other hand, is a defensive alliance. It isn't a country. It doesn't have borders of its own - its members have borders. NATO simply says "if one of us is attacked and they ask for our help, we will help".
The only way to join NATO is for a country to want to join, and for all existing members to agree.
About as different to China as you can possibly get.
Problem with that is there's no product being exported. The customer is actively crossing the state boundary, rather than the company doing it. i.e. the service would have no presence in Texas if the customer didn't load up the site to bring it in. The servers and company all remain outside the state.
Putting aside the 1st Amendment part of it all, would this not also violate the whole part of the constitution which gives the power over interstate trade to the federal government, not states?
If these social media companies are based in, say, California and people access the sites in Texas, isn't that interstate trade?
I suppose it'd be different if they had a physical presence in Texas itself but if they didn't, it doesn't seem like Texas would have jurisdiction?
>The Texas state law also attempts to prohibit social media companies from not allowing Texas-based users to access their sites.
That sounds remarkably like trying to interfere in inter-state trade by forcing them to trade inter-state? Not sure that'd stand up in court either.
The LJ 4 and LJ5 will basically work forever. The parts are super simple to swap out, so you can keep it going and going.
Got myself a second hand LJ4 when I was at uni in 2006. Think I printed 50,000 pages on it over a couple of years. Cartridges were £20 a pop. Worked out 1/10th the price I could print at the uni.
Precisely this. When sharing said data, especially if it is special category data, they would need to be explicit as to who they were sharing it with, and for what purpose it would be processed. A catch all "we share with others" is not enough under GDPR.
Consent. If I put a photo on Google's site, I give consent under Google's terms for its use there. I do not give carte blanche to every random company to take it and use it how they see fit.
And, if Google were to sell that data, they'd still need explicit, informed consent for that particular use too.
This is yet another attempt to get people to use Bing. I'm honestly surprised they've not been sued for the same old nonsense it keeps doing, with the existing start menu search box - leveraging its dominance in desktop computing to force people onto its other services.
This box? If you can't swap out the search source? Would pretty much guarantee that competitors lodge complaints.
We have periodically tried out AMD powered laptops and the result has nearly always been the same - the battery life on them is considerably lower than their Intel equivalents.
Now, this is likely not all AMD's fault to be honest - but manufacturers seem to build their AMD laptops that bit cheaper than their Intel ones. Overall quality usually seems lower.
So we end up sticking with Intel in laptops. Desktops though? More than happy to have an AMD chip in a desktop.
Most of the other companies have their MIS solutions listed on the GCloud 12 procurement framework site. Which awards 2 year contracts, with options for 2 1 year extensions at the wish of the customer.
At least 1 of their competitors is explicitly advertising 1 year contracts as well.
So, where they got the idea that 3 year contracts are standard from is a mystery.
Rather a large assumption there - that the "purity" crowd aren't publishing to the same frequency.
They may well be doing so, but a) their views are less popular so they get read less and/or b) there's just not that many of them and therefore the numbers of such articles is low due to that.
Assuming there's some widespread bias about an issue that the majority of people neither know nor care about is rather odd.
The idea will be a 3D internet. But as its being pushed purely by companies, it'll be a bunch of walled gardens, and no doubt things like moving assets between services will involve a cost. Getting any assets in the first place will involve a cost too - either buying them from said companies, or paying to be allowed to import your own.
Its all about milking money, not about creating a true collaboration environment.
Current inflation is supply lead - there are constraints on a great many things, meaning higher prices as people fight for those supplies.
What you're talking about is demand lead inflation - where people are paid more and more, forcing prices up. That isn't currently happening anywhere near as much.
Its why the Bank of England putting interest rates up was a bad move, as it won't do what they want.
The fix to the issue is increased supply - more gas, more electricity, more grain imports etc...
Huh? What products need different controllers? Do you mean different entirely different segments?
Ubiquiti's Unifi networking range all uses one controller.
Their CCTV platform all uses one controller.
Their phone system uses one, etc...
Or do you expect one controller to handle all that? If so, that'd be a bit odd as no other company does either from what I can tell.
To a Brit, the US tax system is bizarre. The last time I filed a tax return? Never. Its automatic for "normal" employees (as most people don't claim anything back). For everyone else, you can file on the government site, and don't need to pay for some special software to do it. Of course, you can pay accountants or buy software if you want, but the free, normal, way of doing it is available to all.
How on Earth is there not just a simple government portal for that?
Well, yes. OVH are clear about what their services offer. I've used them for years for development and gaming server hosting. Would I put stuff from work there? No, that's on Azure, suitably redundant.
Gotta pick the service that fulfils your needs. Anyone who uses OVH for critical services, and doesn't put in place their own redundancy is asking for trouble. And that's from a happy OVH customer.
The downvoting is odd at times.
But realistically, at the moment, "globalisation" has gone a bit too far. Its a great idea, for non-strategic stuff. But for strategic industry? That should not be overseas IMO.
But we're starting to see some sense from governments. New chip fabs being mooted in the EU, for example. They just need to go further and ensure critical tools are not being manufactured entirely by countries that we can't actually call allies.