Binary Logic in a Ternary World
Perens' statement is proven correct if Perens (or someone like him, the EFF for example) successfully gets a GPL2 enforcement against either GR or one of their clients through all possible stages of the legal system. So far as I know there is nothing happening whatsoever, and so Perens statement is for the moment incorrect. And therefore, currently, garbage.
No. Perens' statement is neither correct nor incorrect. The correctness of the statement has not been determined -- and as the judge has ruled, Perens is not qualified in the eyes of the legal system to evaluate the correctness of it. So from a legal perspective, his statement can only be considered opinion.
It becomes a fact if and only if there is a legal judgment concerning GR's compliance or lack thereof with GPL2. This needs to be tried in a case specific to it, and not in a defamation suit, so the judge has ruled correctly here.