Re: It's still not hard to do.
Depends on the site - in the DC where I work they differentiate staff at a glance by their lanyard colour (amongst other means) and are strict on you wearing one of their lanyards.
1744 publicly visible posts • joined 29 Jun 2011
I agree with everything you've said and I hope they can keep going however the cynical side of me is now fully expecting this org to be lawsuited into bankruptcy by the US government for some sort of "stealing government data" or "promoting anti-US ideology" made-up nonsense to prove the point that they are in control.
A similar thing happened with the SS Atlantic Conveyer during the Falklands war - it was hit by an Exocet missile and sunk (along with all but one of the Chinook helicopters sent for the mission which caused massive problems later) however the stores reports for it suggested it would have sunk before leaving the UK under the weight of kit which was supposed to be on board!
I remember Penny Mordaunt on some TV programme or other stating that for her maiden speech (IIRC), which is supposed to be humorous in some regard, she talked about her Royal Navy reserve officer's training, including a section on caring for your penis and testicles in the field and how the women on the course had been "issued the incorrect equipment". She had to get the parliamentary staff to check if a) she was allowed to say "penis and testicles" on the floor of the house (the decision was that "as they were things, they could be mentioned") and 2. whether or not they had been said before (they had not).
In the DC where I work they use the fence turnstiles to check people in/out (since you can't tailgate) and the fire alarm triggers a printer which spews out a building occupancy report that they can do a check from (based on who was in the fence line at the time the alarm was triggered I presume)
Rest assured even 13 years ago when I worked in ATC engineering for a bit they had the capacity to train controllers (both new ones being taught how to do the work and existing controllers doing refresher training) using simulators which could generate massive traffic loads if needed for the scenario.
So it's easily possible these days to get controllers to practice emergency scenarios without getting anywhere near a live flight, and they do it all the time.
If you think them pronouncing "yes" as "yis" is odd, look up how they pronounce "deck". There's even a whole video on how they build their decks as they take them so seriously.
And secondly, if such an attack was detected, the kernel could immediately be forked to an EU-specific variant which did NOT contain the back door, and from then on we could develop our own parallel kernel, taking upstream content from the original one as long as it met the required security standards etc.
Teachers were 'locked out' for a whole two hours preventing them from teaching?!? Whiskey, tango, foxtrot! All those years of education to earn a teaching certificate and they cannot produce an ad-hoc lesson plan without a computer? Totally lame and speaks volumes about our modern education system. Any teacher worth their degree should have a half-dozen lessons ready to go for those odd days where something goes wrong.
Half the time these days teachers aren't allowed to teach without working computer systems, both from a perspective of tracking the student's progress, plus from basic attendance and health and safety requirements - if you can't prove where the kids are, then they can't operate. Yes they should have a backup system on pen and paper for this but with all the security stuff these days (esp. in the US around unauthorised entry given the staggering numbers of attacks on schools) the kids may not be even able to get into certain areas of the school safely without working systems.
Is it not possible to activate the button with some kind of pointèd stick? Or failing that, a loganberry?
Which is true from a technical standpoint, but from a usability standpoint if parents can't easily understand how to enforce the restrictions, then they might as well not exist as they will be badly used or misused.
I've never looked at how to do parental controls on an Apple device before but UI improvements or better workflows and easier to understand instructions may be required if so many parents (and I don't know what the % is here either, some people are always going to be bad with technology) can't get the thing working right.
Datacentres unfortunately produce a lot of heat and a constant "hum", so unless you were in a cooler climate and re-used that heat for residential heating, and had good soundproofing, you wouldn't want to use the floors above for anything much. It may be OK for an office but not for housing.
Exactly - they can put in all the crap they like including "we get to enslave you up to your 10x great grandchildren" as long as they have one line which says "Nothing in this agreement supersedes any local law or statute in your jurisdiction".
But you'd expect there to be more than one supplier bidding for a CCS framework contract wouldn't you? Unless the Met doctored the requirements in such a way that only Palantir could meet them, in which case you'd use some kind of expedited single-supplier process rather than using CCS.
It all seems very odd to me too
There's clearly some gamesmanship going on here between the Met and MOPAC. So MOPAC pull the rug out from under a £50M Palantir contract, and the response - in a ridiculously short time frame, no less - is to retort with, "Well, if you won't let us spend £50 Million with Palantir, we want *six times as much* to buy from all these other companies.
Or might it be that these are the other tenders which come up around this time for renewal in one big lump at the "start" of the financial year?
Things like horse's fodder and radio services aren't likely to have been in the Palantir contract.
These are likely the contracts which were approved by MOPAC, but they blocked one more which would otherwise have come out in the rush.
If those orgs followed their purchasing frameworks correctly and Palantir won then they would get the contract (whatever we think of them as a horrible nasty organisation).
In this case it appears MOPAC is alleging that the Met didn't follow the rules, so the request for tender got pulled.
If done correctly, the purchasing framework works. You're supposed to be able to choose the best value for money contract which meets the requirements laid out in the application pack, whether that be mandatory ones like number of units, requirements around how they work, certain features they must have etc, or optional ones like quality of life improvements or inclusions above the must-have requirements. Cost should only form a part of the score, you could also score elements around how good the support has been from that company previously, what kind of environmental plan they have, how well they align with the goals of the organisation etc.
Whilst I think we can all agree that politicians will overdramatise things when it's in their interests, we also shouldn't ignore the fact that countries like Russia are actively conducting sub-threshold and grey warfare campaigns against the rest of Europe and the US and misinformation and disinformation is a large part of this, even if it's just amplifying what's already there.
Problem is if they chuck that out as a press release to their customers they'll look totally clueless since it's been there all along and some of their customers use that to pay already, and something like that is ripe for being released as marketing twaddle.
But the corollary there is that "accountable" bodies run by politicians will bend and sway to the political whim of the moment, good or ill.
Sometimes we need things to be independent of politics - like the police, the courts, the watchdogs etc, otherwise you end up with a situation like they have in the USA currently where a suitably empowered politician can break entire agencies by ordering them to go after their political enemies, or even by just scrapping everything, firing most people, and telling the remainder to do no work.
People are free to choose whether or not to be employed by the state healthcare system. Somewhere like France or Germany it's all insurance-run anyway but the government puts a cap on what the insurers can charge, and subsidises the cost of treatment, so that everyone wins - capitalists make their (reasonable) profits, citizens get good, prompt healthcare, and those who can't afford it don't have to pay.
Even in the UK we still have private medical companies like BUPA you can go and work for if you don't like the idea of working for the NHS - in fact a lot of our senior doctors work for both, doing private practice and NHS shifts.
Only America has this insane system of the healthcare companies competing with each other to charge as much as possible whilst the insurers compete with each other to cover as little as possible of the bill - the only person who loses out in such a system is the citizen, but as they only exist in the USA to be a money source then no one with the ability to do anything about it will do that because they want the system the way it is so they can make their profits.
If the ships were going anywhere dangerous they would turn the terminals off. It's not like they don't have control over them physically, and they often do in the RN confiscate people's phones and ensure they're turned off if they're doing some specialist or sensitive work or the ship is going into a sensitive area. Same with Starlink, it would just be physically powered down and unplugged, at which point it's an antenna-shaped brick.
You are free to express your opinions. You are also free to accept the consequences of those opinions, which may extend to people or organisations with different opinions choosing not to do business with you.
The UK Government would be well within their rights to refuse to do business with SpaceX if they chose to over these views. They're not attempting to suppress them, they're exercising their right to choose who they pay taxpayer money to.
After all, if we extend your argument, shouldn't the UK government use Chinese child labour for all of it's projects as it's a lot more cost-efficient than employing people in the UK? But we don't, because we take the (right) moral position that exploiting children is wrong and our government shouldn't be doing that.
If you want to boil liquids in a microwave it's best to give them some sort of nucleation source to form around - drop a toothpick or plastic spatula with a rough(ish) surface so that the gases in the water can form bubbles (nucleate) and they can then exit the liquid.
If you're boiling soup or something it's fine as the ingredients in the soup will form that surface, but plain water can just superheat and won't show any signs until you disturb it, at which point all of the energy is released at once, throwing superheated water everywhere and burning anything it comes into contact with which is fleshy and/or alive.