Strange all these billionairse s in trouble vansishing at sea...
NC
1953 publicly visible posts • joined 28 Jun 2011
"The routine cat-calling with terms like SJW, woke, racist, fascist etc from both sides exacerbate differences and inflame opinions"
This the point of language like that. It is the old Marxist Mindfuck trick of getting you to agree to something small and harmless and then using it to prove the world needs a Revolution and you are taught to hate.
Real life is just Us, Marxism always declares its THEM and us, and THEY are beyond the pale. And usually the targets of the projection that WE place upon them
So BLACK lives matter - an organisation that is by definition institutionally racist - declares that 'only whites (how racist is that?) are racist!.
And so on.
Better start building those small nuclear plants now.
The data centres are all moving in that direction, because renewables are simply pants for reliable power sources.
The grid is only setting up the data centres to blame for when (lack of) renewable energy crashes the grid completely...
Sadly your game theory relies on sane and Christian morality following national leaders.
A world in which you are the last man standing and all that complicated tech you were afraid of and couldn't duplicate has ceased to exist, along with anything that stands in your way, and billions of people occupying land that you quite fancy owning, as well as a few billion you couldn't offer a future to , is an ideal outcome from the likes of the Ayatollah, and Putin.
And is not such a bad outcome if all those dead people were people you technically owed billions of dollars to, as well.
The nuclear Ctrl-Alt-Delete reboot of civilisations is favoured by many people .
And the winners write the history books.
Ah! Another Art Student who Cant Do Sums.
Try computing the energy content of all the road fuel sold annually, taking an reasonable fraction - say 30% - and converting to KWh, and dividing by the hours in a year, to get the *average* amount of extra electricity required - even assuming the grid is up to it.
It comfortable exceeds existing generating capacity. Do the sums. Preferably without taking your socks off when numbers greater than ten are involved
But who will bell the renewable cat and build these batteries made of unobtanium and fairy fart electrolyte?
In the end hte cost of a totally (or even partially) renewable grid far far exceeds a nuclear one, which doesn't need all the fairy farts. And handwavey technology that not only does not exist, but cannot.
Nature does not change the laws of electrochemistry just because someone wants to sell you a windmill.
Because they are small enough to not need active cooling under SCRAM conditions - they can use simple convection, and that removes a huge chunk of regulatory nonsense. You don't need to regulate a triply redundant backup system that you didn't install.
Because they are small enough to be build in a factory and *type approved*, thus not needing specific regulatory approval at each site, and small enough to be shipped more or less complete to the installation site.
And in the context of data centres, cheap enough so that you can have two for redundancy, and generate revenue from the second one when the first is operational.
SMRs are also cheap enough to be fundable by large industrial and IT corporations in a way a 3GW monster is not.
|The rate of evaporation of sweat is massively greater in dry air. I can tolerate 50°C in a dry desert but am suffering in tropical damp heat of 35°C.
In winter it is the wind and the low *absolute* humidity that punishes.
I think the issue with people from cold countries was highlighted by my niece, who moved to te UK from Sweden at one point. There was snow on the ground and it was -5 °C but I dressed in simply a T shirt and IIRC a fleece. And drove to see her...
'Where is your winter coat?'
'Don't need one - 50 yards from the car to your door isn't going to kill me'
And that is it really, in cold climates people expect clothes with several inches of insulation and a windproof outer layer *as a matter of course*. We are more used to milder temperatures so we simply don't bother with all that arctic level crap.
And then feel cold as a result
Unlike the posters here.
Everything in airliner design is geared towards reducing total lifetime cost of the passenger mile. As engine designs develop, and the market changes, aircraft design also must change.
There is a complex optimisation between aircraft cruising speed (= more passenger miles per yer) , aircraft drag (=more fuel per passenger mile), wingspan (=less terminals can accomodate giant planes) and wing aspect ratio, (long thin wings have less drag - sailplanes) (=greater structural issues, needing more weight to bring strength).
Adding a strut creates lift, and reduces the need for wing root strength, but adds drag.
One assumes the overall equation is marginally positive, or they wouldn't be doing it.
Not one penny of renewable subsidies will be affected.
And the UK gummint is not funding Sizewell. EDF is. At a strike price well below the holistic cost of any renewable+grid extension+ gas backup + rotten capacity factor + short lifetime + STOR plant + battery short term grid stabilisation + cost of inevitable grid outages..
France decided to use rivers to cool some of its reactors, but then the envirionmental lobby decreed that warm fish was a nono, so they werent allowed to fully utilise them
Japan has a lot of coastline.
Windmills kill birds and bats and parachutists and cause sleep disturbances in humans.
Windmills are not safe.
"The development of nuclear power does not imply that renewable energy sources are not also being developed."
That depends on whether engineer politicians or profiteers are setting the policy:
"There is nothing a fleet of dispatchable nuclear power plants cannot do that cannot be done worse and more expensively and with higher carbon emissions and more adverse environmental impact by adding intermittent renewable energy."
Yeah, the science is settled. a gamma ray from material that came out of a nuclear plant is COMPLETELY DIFFERENT from a gamma ray that occurs naturally when 'natural' uranium decays...
That's why you don't have to clear Dartmoor at 20mSv/yr, but you do have to clear Fukushima at 2mSv/yr
There really are fairies at the bottom of my garden, and secret microchips in the vaccines they gave me.
The precautionary principle: A justification for spending enormous sums of other people's money on something that doesn't exist, and never will.
Cui Bono? Is that man warning you about this, a purveyor of a solution perhaps?
That started the telephone revolution before anywhere else. It has a huge installed base of copper, and some very tight ducting.
It also has high wage levels for skilled people.
Its simply more expensive to throw fiber in, but it is coming.
Just be happy you don't live in e,g., rural USA. Or Germany.
assuming you buy the 'co2 causes massive warming' scenario which has failed to predict anything accurately in the last 30 years.
In the end Global warming doom is irrelevant. Northing the uk does will make the slightest difference.
'Saving the planet' is down to India and China.
Our problem is more local. with ecohippies shrieking against fracking we have no economically viable local energy source left.
Do we really want to rely on Arab nations and Russia?
In the limit uranium is abundant everywhere. And you don't need very much. A mass produced production engineered bog standard reactor is exactly what we need to meet any future challenges